It's amazing how everyone involved in this is so short-sighted. The nog could've gotten some random NGO job and sent far more money home (or used it for gold teeth, or whatever), and the subverters that put him in could've started by vetting incoming vibrants and trying to get them good PR, rather than shoveling rapists and murderers in as fast as their greedy little hands can.
'Unite' works for people acting in good faith. Normie conservatives, libertarians, and edgy kids are all fine. People like Ben Shapiro and Graham are saboteurs - their goal isn't to represent you, it's to manage your decline.
That's a pretty good litmus test. Unless someone has a skill or asset that makes them independently valuable (e.g. Trump having billions of dollars), getting the vax should completely discredit them as a political figure.
I'm not excusing it. I'm observing reality.
That's not remotely how it works. "Never fight back" is a suicidal strategy; if Trump had pushed back on the election fraud, it would have been a minor media narrative like "russiagate" instead of a successful regime change op.
. I haven't heard Shapiro be anything but critical of illegal immigration for as long as I've listened to him
That's the standard RINO line. Infinite foreign criminals and welfare recipients, as long as they come in "legally".
There's a reason he's promoted by Facebook. His entire purpose is to neutralize any actual opposition to the left.
Trump fucked up January 6th. His continuous narrative about the rigged election and the fantasy that the VP could overturn it convinced a bunch of gullible rubes that if they marched into the capitol, everybody'd go "golly, you win" and they'd get their God Emporer back.
That's fucking idiotic. The left got to riot without consequence for an entire summer, and a peaceful protest by the right was met with gunfire by the regime. Excusing this makes you either an idiot or totally craven, and probably both.
After 2016, Shapiro said that despite is flaws, Trump was far better than he ever expected, and he voted for Trump in 2020.
After 2016, rats like him did precisely that, only to turn on him again after J6. Lindsay Graham and his ilk also pretended to stop opposing Trump during the same time interval.
Oh, they just cut them up and resolder them to eliminate problematic gender implications. It even has the same result!
they had to remove all nonhuman primates from the training data to avoid being "problematic"?
Oh no, it's much worse than that. They removed primates from the options to classify something as - absolutely nothing is permitted to be classified as a gorilla - the very concept of a gorilla has been abolished from the AI's mind.
The five percent "Nikki Haley" is what really sells this poll as absurd. Pretty much everyone who knows about her dislikes her. Similarly, there might be one or two low-info people that like Pence, but 8 percent is massively over-budget.
The Mrs. Degree was a pretty interesting thing. It's like a dowry, but paid to a third party instead.
Honestly, though, it'd be worth every penny if there were non-squishy Christian schools that could reliably pair off high-status men and women in a healthy way.
These account for 74% of bachelor's degrees issued 2018-2019.
The assumption is that the remainder follow a roughly similar split - they're unlabeled, so assuming the same valid-fake distribution as the rest of the dataset is the best we can do.
found this web site. that lists majors by political leaning. No idea where the numbers come from, but presumably they have a basis other than an assumption.
Presumably. The proportions aren't listed, though, and they don't map cleanly to the other dataset.
His premise that college graduates are evenly split is wrong too. Pew Research found that college graduates skew democratic. My calculations say 59% of college graduates are Democrats.
That's not right. The 2016 election, in which graduates (docs excluded, since we're looking at bach degree stats, and they're negligible in number regardless) skewed more left-wing than usual, was still split 49-45, with 'some college' splitting 43-53 in the other direction.
A way they get students to take socjus classes is by promising that it will be easy "A"s. As long as what you write aligns with their viewpoint, of course.
Essentially. They also stretch definitions of various credits. At some colleges, there are 'intro to gay studies' classes that cover like three different Gen. Eds, while something like Music and Ancient Germany covers one.
It's not sincere belief - they'd be living among the 'diverse' if they were believers. The people in power have a very old, very simple mindset - they are currently in power, there is a more capable group of people than them who they usurped, and they want to destroy that group before it can fix that problem.