1
Theacefospades 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you really say that exodus, Deuteronomy and Levitics came before Abraham.

You might be retarded son.

9
Theacefospades 9 points ago +9 / -0

They're subsidized by taxes, and used for luxury export. They're not for decoration, they're cash cows for rich people.

You said people would starve. I'm telling you most of the food grown DOESNT FEED US.

So fucking YES 70% of it going away wouldnt starve anybody, because it isnt feeding anybody.

15
Theacefospades 15 points ago +15 / -0

You dont work in ag. Not even adjacent to it.

Waste, and excess capacity are universal Constants, because prices are kept so arbitrarily low.

Prices are so low entire groves go unpacked because even with slave wage labor, it still costs more to ship the shit than to leave it on the tree

1
Theacefospades 1 point ago +1 / -0

This isnt really an argument of anything except pro-anarchism. Which if that's how you meant it good for you.

But if it isnt, it hold no water, it's built on the same essential foundation as "some people are intersex therefore gender is a spectrum"

Declaring that because there are Grey areas and difficulties in defining overlap between borderline definitions isnt an argument against the existence of those definition, only an observation of our failure in ability to observe them perfectly.

The 30 yo in th3 example being punished for that would be just. Declaring that injustice can be meted out by organization using justice as a smokescreen doesn't negate that.

3
Theacefospades 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Don't put people in jail for kidnapping! Thats hypocrisy!"

3
Theacefospades 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're looking at it all wrong heh. This is peak entertainment. Watching puffed up black retards getting their faces smashed in is better entertainment than I would ordinarily hope for.

4
Theacefospades 4 points ago +4 / -0

If morals are relative then doing right thing is just sorting.

So sure. Jews DO always do the right thing.

15
Theacefospades 15 points ago +15 / -0

Its so fucking dishonest.

An "ideal america" would be one where job gains we went to Americans not h1bs.

An "ideal America" would be one not involved in foreign wars between sand people.

An "ideal america" would be one that made foreign lobbying illegal.

An "ideal america" would be one that was 70%+ white.

An "ideal america" would be one with a single tiered justice system.

An "ideal america" would be one with selective suffrage.

So just one where a single income can support a single family in a neighborhood of peers without having to worry about subsidized subhuman ruining your home, career or murdering you. One with safe transportation.

An america that's government was concerned with making sure Americans were wealthy, safe, and happy.

So you know. Just criticism with no vision.

10
Theacefospades 10 points ago +10 / -0

We have a resident one. Reading his takes on the Bible is funking bonkers.

He dives headlong into the inverse version of "use the clear to illuminate the obscure"

1
Theacefospades 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you were luckier you'd be less retarded.

I was very specific with my words, you continue to bring up irrelevant anecdotes.

"There's a red one right there!" In literal form.

Here are some topics for you to research:

Black opinion surveys on morality, OJ simspon, Rodney king, brown, Floyd, and trayvon. Black jury bias Concentration of population effects Mere exposure. IQ as it relates to propensity for violence.

1
Theacefospades 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gameplay loop is an annoying one because it's a design term that plebs have tried to adopt to sound smart, while not actually understanding what it's useful for.

3
Theacefospades 3 points ago +3 / -0

With all due respect. Which is to say, none at all.

That's retarded as fuck.

1
Theacefospades 1 point ago +1 / -0

98% implies awareness of exceptions. Almost a million of them in fact.

But regardless, what you believe has very little to do with reality. They've admitted to it en mass, and behave in demonstration of it at all levels of society. Juries being the obvious example

5
Theacefospades 5 points ago +5 / -0

The only difference between a black who has killed and one who hasn't is opportunity.

98% of blacks would kill you if you're white and they thought they could get away with ut.

4
Theacefospades 4 points ago +4 / -0

Put it this way. If murder is an issue of the heart, then yes, 98% of them are. Through fact that they haven't managed to follow through yet is WHY you need to be cautious

1
Theacefospades 1 point ago +1 / -0

You read this first hand or stolen it from me.

Regardless. Good quote

1
Theacefospades 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Wall is my favorite. Animals is the most consistent

Division bell has the longest string of perfect songs.

Final cut has the most powerful tracks.

There are no bad pink Floyd songs

2
Theacefospades 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because it's not answering your question. Is deploying a million calculations to determine what a gramatically correct answer to your question would look like with relevant keywords.

Its like most of the language paradoxes in English. "Can got make a rock song big he can't lift it" isnt a testament against god, it's an observation that English can construct a gramatically correct sentence that has no meaning. In much the same what that "horse magnets are correct" isnt meaningful, despite being a valid sentence.

Computers work by using 10 trillion switches. The switches activate in the situations where their trigger is present. The switches only have "yes" and "no" the switches are descriptors "blue" "vegatable" "french" given a large enough calculation you can represent anything given enough " it isnt" phrases

The difficulty you have is that as a human you have heuristics and intuition that makes that many calculations unnecessary for you. You can see an apple is an apple because you can see it. A computer has to define all the space in the universe that ISNT "apple" to describe it.

So think of the staggering number of calculations required to do that, and apply it to language. Thats what an LLM is. It returns you the computer equivalent of infinity monies typing for nearly infinite time, and then returning what it recognizes as the most likely response to your question.

If you asked "what color is the sky?" It individually calculates the likelihood that when that text occurs in that order, the text that follows would say "green" "banana" "embezzelment" "blue" "lkjh" "asdf" or "2,437" and then picks the one with the highest score.

Every word in its database is weighted on a graph with 10,000 axis, indicating what kind of word it is, and where it should fit in text. The values in that matrix corrospond to those switches we brought up earlier. Thus what it produces, is just a arbitrarily large number of calculations, run through a random letter generator, and picking the option that most closing resembles it's training data.

3
Theacefospades 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oversaturation of copycats is the strongest evidence that quality exists in the first place. Nobody bothers to emulate garbage.

view more: Next ›