in the grand scheme i care pretty little about how retarded you are, but if there will be several of you running around later voting for the 1% libertarian party and claiming we should be defending our gay weed farms with guns, i will care then, as that'll be more work for people like me.
"strawman strawman i am not a libertarian!! or if i am im one of the good ones i swear!"
it doesn't matter what you think you are. you, currently, act perfectly to propagate that sort of idiocy upon the world. in every essence of the word, you are a tool.
i hope you can have a flash of introspection here and realize we ought to be on the same side, but they do say hope dies last.
see how easily they get you to detach from people who would otherwise be your allies? tell me, do you think the word "fed" and its usage came naturally into your vocabulary, or was it implanted there?
what we need most in the world right now is introspection. practice it.
The land is planted thick with man's laws, not god's, and if the devil himself were to appear in that courtroom, I would give him the benefit of the law.
this is a rather bleak outlook. where does Man get any of his ideas from if not from God?
if you reject God's laws, what prevents the devil from making the very ones you will apply to him later? he is not an idle fellow. if you leave the chess set alone, he will move the pieces in his favor when you're not looking.
the system in question just declared this guy innocent. it also generally hails him as a modern artist and a successful businessman. you will find that by defending him at all, you do the bidding of this system much more than i do. the correct outlook is to consider removing the source of these offers first, then worry about why people are taking them. defending the pimp against the hoes, or the drug dealer against the addicts, or any other analogy, does little to make either go away.
while you're correct that the people taking the offer still have agency, considering that it should be obvious that the source of the problem is the guy offering and pushing mental, spiritual and physical destruction on people, i find it extremely suspect how the grandest message both you and others put out is not "let's rid ourselves of these heinous people", but "i'm glad my population got turned into whores and paid the price, it makes me happy when these bitches get their comeuppance."
if you want to stand a chance in hell of not seeing any more weinsteins scurrying about like diseased fat rats laying their hands on our people, these thoughts should not even be possible within your neurological connections. the only one that ought show up is "this man has ruined what used to be my people, i must stop him.". weinstein and his ilk are like this, which is why they rape, rob, and kill gentiles any chance they get. weinstein would rub his hands with glee if you were falsely accused of rape. we will simply not get anywhere if ever we defend them against our own, no matter how stupid our own may sometimes be.
yet we teach our kids to tale lessons from them
so these women were taught to take lessons from the men who later taught them they had to suck dick to get ahead, and this is purely their fault (read: our fault)?
if someone attacks me or my people i don't really care who believed in what and when, i just want to kill the attacker before he can do harm. why is it so hard for people on this forum to think like this without kvetching about how actually the attackers were right to take advantage of some dumb whores (read: our kindred women)?
honest question: would it not be culturally, practically, theoretically, in all ways beneficial for us to just say it was rape, considering the very real mindrape hollywood has to force on anyone to get them to have sex with creatures like these?
"this demon roaming the earth is disgusting and deserves death, but his horned friends are right, he is innocent" just muddies the waters, IMO.
you're a neurotic one, aren't you?
it seems in truth we agree on things. people here are however gravitating to a woman-hating extreme (even if you aren't, mr. Not All), so i'll keep providing the counterbalance while you call it strawmanning.
ultimately unworthy
you use the word ultimately with too much confidence for how wrong its usage here is.
superficially, defending this chick may have been unworthy. i agree with you on this. the circumstances are as such that the guy risks life and limb first, then prison time later, for little to no acknowledgement. it's a raw deal. maybe you and i would do the same no matter our machoisms.
ultimately, the surety with which you and others here denounce all women is what will bring us all ultimate ruin. i think it unfortunate the state they're in, and the state we're in as a result, but to simply abandon biology and civilization both is nothing short of cultural suicide. you do little more than play into the hands of those who want you to die as soon as possible, be it by getting shot by the North American Street Ape portrayed above, or by just dying alone at 70 and leaving nothing upon the earth.
if these are not your women, where are your women?
women and men are both culturally destroyed nowadays. if you think the solution even approaches anything like outright abandoning the half of the population that can bear children, you've got another thing coming. equally i would ask how you can expect any woman to have your back if you're openly and brazenly declaring you'd leave her to swarthy invaders without so much as blinking an eye.
In either case, it's undeniable that society has created a perverse incentive structure that encourages this behavior while discouraging sacrifice, and is ultimately suicidal
i would hope then that more people can recognize the suicidality of this worldview. it makes little sense to me that so many people can realize the disjointedness of the world currently, but still engage in it fully and rationalize that they're "just doing the smart thing" or "getting back at those whores". sitting around as your women are robbed by creatures from the south is never smart, it's precisely what the enemy you hate intends for you to do. i suppose nobody is immune to propaganda though, not even here.
and in a week: "wow, these streets are unsafe with all these tyrone chads robbing bitch Stacey chicks all over the place. speaking of chicks, where have all the good women gone? and why are these two black mgtow lords following me into this alley?"
well.. yes. you can dress it up in excuses like "the girl would not immediately suck my dick afterwards so it is materially worthless", but, yes.
the guy sitting down is announcing to the world in one fell swoop: "i am weak, and will defend neither my race, nor culture, nor civilization. if you are a violent person, you're free to kill everyone around me unimpeded by me, and when you're done, you can jump at my defenseless throat as well." chances are he would have been just as useless if the victim was male, too.
by all definitions, that's a "beta male". tens of thousands of years ago he would have been clubbed in his hidey hole in the forest to get robbed of his meager holdings, and that would have been the end of him and his mentality. nowadays they'll use a gun.
helldivers and palworld have 0 loyalties to you, us, or anything we stand for aside from a vague idea of "wanting good media". they are what these shows were 10 years ago.
conquest's second law; any organization not explicitly right-wing will eventually turn left-wing.
do you think the oft-pornographic engagement with modern-day sexy media is exactly equal to looking at a piece of art in the Louvre? is Rule 34 just one big art project?
it is neither the intent nor effect of those sculptures/paintings to cause extreme arousal in their viewers to the point where it can affect the way they act and think, and especially not on a cultural level - i do not see kids learning to sculpt so they can have naked Venus in their bedrooms.
you could argue it is not the intent of sexy video games to do that either (if you ignore things like Yoko Taro asking people to send pornography of the main character of Nier: Automata to him), but it certainly is the effect, and the ultimate purpose of a system is what it does, not what it intends. when even frankly tame examples of this stuff can balloon out of control and become a huge chunk of pornography culture, like Overwatch, i think we should be wary as hell of the more daring instances, like Stellar Blade sticking asses in your face the entire time or Dead or Alive just dressing their characters up like they're in an actual real-world pornography magazine.
either we agree on the excess of porn in modern society, or we don't. there cannot be a "but my enemies don't like this porn", that's how you end up with transgender pornstars claiming to be conservative right-wingers because they aren't liked by the left.
vs
vs
practically the same, i know. one is some guy painting a turkish concubine, another is an industrialized pornography magazine reference, and another is prompting the user to "rub vigorously" to get to view more pornography.
woe be upon us, now we must visit a jewish website to find our pornography... i was hoping my epic based chudlord gigachad game developers would give me my pornography instead...