Harvey Weinsteins rape conviction just got overturned.
(twitter.com)
Comments (59)
sorted by:
They tailor-make laws to get Trump for sexual assault that never happened but they let this guy go.
Oy vey!
It wasn't rape. He is one of the most disgusting human beings and absolutely part of what is wrong with society right now, and I would love to see him burn, but it wasn't rape.
All Actors Are Whores #Aaaw
#sexworkisrealwork
Agreed. He is a slimy piece of shit and it would improve my life immensely if he (and trash like him) would just fuck off permanently but nothing he did was rape. It wasn't even sexual assault. At worst some of it was harassment.
Most of it was either soliciting or regret-after-the-deed (and money/fame was gained).
At the very least, the same people who defended Zoe Quinn have zero room to talk on the issue.
Either trading sexual favors for promotion is okay or it isn't, and if it isn't, then a woman who takes the initiative to use sex to gain an unfair advantage is the spitting definition of a "pickme." Blows my mind how the biggest "pickmes" of them all (whores) have the nerve to call other women pickmes, then again leftist men are the biggest incels and they call other men incels so go figure.
honest question: would it not be culturally, practically, theoretically, in all ways beneficial for us to just say it was rape, considering the very real mindrape hollywood has to force on anyone to get them to have sex with creatures like these?
"this demon roaming the earth is disgusting and deserves death, but his horned friends are right, he is innocent" just muddies the waters, IMO.
No. Look at the list of actresses that came out against him vs the ones who didn't.
Almost every one that did was older, past her prime, and had nothing to lose by pulling this bridge up after her, like Susan Sarandon for example.
Meanwhile you have Jennifer Lawrence who not only said nothing but also just dropped off the fucking map for a few years after this happened because she was no longer being fed roles.
The whole thing was a group of post wall, middle-aged and older women making sure their younger competition wouldn't have the same opportunities as they did, no matter what it might have taken to get the roles. When various male actors came out with their own tales of sexual assault being made against them, like Terry Crews, they were told to shut up and let the women talk, it had nothing to actually do with whatever abuse was going on in Hollywood, certain groups just wanted to retain leverage over others.
I think what this misses is the responsibility of the fame-chasing whores (of both sexes, although my understanding is that this particular pimp was only into women) for accepting the deal.
Exactly. This displaces scrutiny from the actual problem (Hollywood is, and always was, run by degenerates yet we teach our kids to tale lessons from them) to a convinient scapegoat.
so these women were taught to take lessons from the men who later taught them they had to suck dick to get ahead, and this is purely their fault (read: our fault)?
if someone attacks me or my people i don't really care who believed in what and when, i just want to kill the attacker before he can do harm. why is it so hard for people on this forum to think like this without kvetching about how actually the attackers were right to take advantage of some dumb whores (read: our kindred women)?
It's his fault for offering the deal, and also [his/her] fault for taking it. The whole transaction is repugnant, and everyone involved should be viewed with disgust for participating.
You aren't wrong to say that Harvey Weinstein should probably get some punishment for offering. You are wrong to say that the women have no agency in accepting. You draw the analogy of an "attacker," but he did not "attack" anyone. These people walked into the office, they were offered "fame and fortune for your body," and they said "yes."
Realistically, the whole thing is closest to prostitution, except that in this case the john and the pimp are essentially one guy. Ergo, the prostitute and the john/pimp should both be punished. Unfortunately, we are not operating under that system, and the substitute system we have, of lying about what actually occurred to displace all the blame onto one party, is not good. When you call Weinstein an "attacker," who "forces mindrape" on people, you are siding with that system, because you are also displacing agency and thus culpability from the women who willingly took the deal.
Women who make false rape accusations (like these actresses) need to be severely punished. They weren't raped. It's a complete lie to pretend like they were raped.
Similarly, foreign men who prostitute women need to be severely punished.
Both Weinstein and his accusers should be rotting away.
the system in question just declared this guy innocent. it also generally hails him as a modern artist and a successful businessman. you will find that by defending him at all, you do the bidding of this system much more than i do. the correct outlook is to consider removing the source of these offers first, then worry about why people are taking them. defending the pimp against the hoes, or the drug dealer against the addicts, or any other analogy, does little to make either go away.
while you're correct that the people taking the offer still have agency, considering that it should be obvious that the source of the problem is the guy offering and pushing mental, spiritual and physical destruction on people, i find it extremely suspect how the grandest message both you and others put out is not "let's rid ourselves of these heinous people", but "i'm glad my population got turned into whores and paid the price, it makes me happy when these bitches get their comeuppance."
if you want to stand a chance in hell of not seeing any more weinsteins scurrying about like diseased fat rats laying their hands on our people, these thoughts should not even be possible within your neurological connections. the only one that ought show up is "this man has ruined what used to be my people, i must stop him.". weinstein and his ilk are like this, which is why they rape, rob, and kill gentiles any chance they get. weinstein would rub his hands with glee if you were falsely accused of rape. we will simply not get anywhere if ever we defend them against our own, no matter how stupid our own may sometimes be.
no, they correctly changed what he was guilty of to "not rape". he's still guilty of anything else he's beeen charged with.
The real issue is that guys like Weinstein ensure that rather than getting the best actresses, we instead get the actresses who were willing to be used as holes for roles, while the actresses with self-respect and integrity forgo fame and the big bucks in favor of starring in obscure indie films.
Since Weinstein was the gatekeeper, he should be considered primarily responsible, but I don't think of talentless actresses getting multimillion dollar roles that they clearly don't deserve as victims. Had Hollywood been run by men with integrity, no one would know these womens' names.
And if any women could be considered "victims" of this process, it would be the talented women who deserve the big roles but had too much integrity to prostitute themselves for it.
Stop defending the absurdly irresponsible. They aren't victims.
The land is planted thick with man's laws, not god's, and if the devil himself were to appear in that courtroom, I would give him the benefit of the law.
If he is guilty of something, then he is guilty of it. Charge him for propagandizing and psyops against his own peoples. Oh wait, Obama legalized that back in the early 2010s. He broke no laws, he gets no charges. If he broke civil prostitution laws, then fine him for being involved in purchasing a ton of sex, and charge all the hollywood whores who slept with him on the prostitution charges that they are.
If there should be laws against what he has done, then those laws should be made, voted on, approved, and enforced. But what he did was be a John for a bunch of Hollywood prostitutes, not rape.
this is a rather bleak outlook. where does Man get any of his ideas from if not from God?
if you reject God's laws, what prevents the devil from making the very ones you will apply to him later? he is not an idle fellow. if you leave the chess set alone, he will move the pieces in his favor when you're not looking.
there is rape and then there is quid pro quo.
I'm not going to be bias and lie when it is convenient for my side. If I do, I am no better than the people on the left.
lol
Maybe come out and say something directly after it happens rather than waiting until after you are no longer getting roles for it, ladies. Regret isn't rape. Pay for play isn't rape either. It's just prostitution.
Oh crap, ENGAGE WHITE NOISE DEFENSES! The women are about to reeee so hard our heads might blow up like from scanners!
Yeah it wasn't rape, it was a combination of prostitution and manipulation by the entire industry. He's a scumbag that I would open fire on if he came near any of my friends and family but Hollywood has been openly sex trafficking younger manipulated actors for DECADES on the promise they'll 'get bigger roles', He's only a small part of it.
Say what you want about the man but when he was in charge we didn't have movies led by walleyed, fisheyed, indeterminate race hambeasts
He's the only producer that actually bothered to read the script to Good Will Hunting, asking Affleck and Damon why there was a random gay sex scene in the middle of the movie. Turns out the two had put that page in there to see which of the studios would put in the minimum of effort and read the thing and Weinstein was the only one to do so meaning Miramax got to make the film.
wait, you're telling me a jew took a random gay sex scene out of a movie?
The girl power push seemed to really start after he was in legal trouble
I guess the thing keeping ugly women out of Hollywood was the "would Harvey fuck them" filter?
Yeah, the casting couch system was no secret, though they tried to pass it off as a joke sometimes.
It's what savvy parents might warn their kids about when it came to wanting to go to Hollywood.
Problem is, some of the kids wanted into the action. The mother of one of my exes spent years in Whollyweird in her teens and twenties, and then tried pimping her daughter out when she was that age.
What I thought. Seems like a scumbag and sleazy but a lot of what I heard were women who were willing to sleep with a sleazy guy to be able to attain millions. Unless I misheard
Somehow, the women who cooperated and facilitated this culture never get any shade...odd.
And remember, they weren't starving or anything, they were competing against other women for desireable and lucrative movie roles and they whores themselves out for their own benefit.
Sometimes it was, sure, and in the case of Weinstein it was adult women looking for a break that he would facilitate after they climbed on "his ladder", but Hollywood is also known for rampant abuse and rape of child actors and actresses going back decades, to the point many parents who knew about those goings on would never, ever leave their kids alone when on set or working.
Expect lots of reeeeing
Twitter replies are calling him a pedo.
Which is funny because as far as I know he was never convicted of molesting a child. People just throw that word around at things they don't like.
surely you're fucking with us if you think this man doesn't drain adrenochrome out with his teeth down below on the weekly.
He's a fucking disgusting Jew boy but he didn't rape any of those dumb bitches.
Sorry, bitches, but getting your buns blown out by a fast disgusting Jewboy and then happening to get a movie role isn't sexual assault.
Courtesy of the City of Angels, Commiefornia
It wasn't rape, it was transactional. Also, the judge was a fucking moron who had to know this shit would get overturned because he was allowing people to come in and testify on completely separate allegations for which he was found not guilty already at that point that had nothing to do with the alleged conduct he was being charged for to destroy his character/trustworthiness for the jury. Rape was the wrong charge to go for in the first place. Pandering, possibly pimping, would have been slam fucking dunks. But nah, gotta go for a flamboyant trial that they damn well knew would get overturned.
hoes mad
I think this is to hurt trump. By releasing weinstein, people will be angry that a sexual predator is being let go. They will want to persecute trump even more because they see trump as a sexual predator too. They want to find trump guilty of something to make up for weinstein.
Also... weinstein and metoo is why we have ugly goblinas in shows and games. Some twisted reasoning that if they only have uglies in entertainment, there wouldnt be rape or sexual assault lol.
Still in Jail because of a different Commiefornia conviction
His legal team was a clown car of yentas.
https://media.scored.co/post/axJkmeGXBox4.jpeg
Where's that guy that hates feminists when you need him?
Hollywood whores who suck dick for jobs is not rape. Just because they are older and have become ashamed doesn't mean you were raped.
You blew a corpulent pineapple and got millions for it. Get over it
Say what you want about the guy, the movies he produced were better than the ones his girls did.
free my nigga Harvey he dindu nuffin