4
Kweebecker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Honesty through taking offense:

"You can't make a law to stop the harming of children, that's mean to trans people!"

"You can't invent a violent and irrational ugly monster species in your fiction, that's mean to black people!"

"You can't oppose violent lockdowns and/or the incoming police state, that's hostile to the Left wing parties of the world!"

3
Kweebecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can't say "it wasn't glowy, no conspiracy" and then immediately next line use the scare-echoes.

1
Kweebecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Well listen, it's complicated. Now speaking of credible threats, let me tell you about the south side of Chicago, where I grew up, dangerous area, lots of credible threats happened at the skate park. There were good and bad people on both sides, it's a grey area issue." -What he wished his tweet could have said.

2
Kweebecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

And now we're here, talking about it.

So it profits the left-wing terrorist who gets a reaction and ties up police resources far away from themselves while they, I assume, commit nefarious deeds. And it profits Beanieman since it generates sympathetic press coverage.

10
Kweebecker 10 points ago +10 / -0

high power rifle

As opposed to the low power rifle, which needs to be plugged in for an hour or so to recharge before use.

6
Kweebecker 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'll play a drunken round of CS:GO with an aimbot on while screaming senselessly, in their honor.

3
Kweebecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

And how are they less safe alone in a catholic church? Is there fewer tripping hazards? They're alone. (yeah, yeah, I know what they mean, but linguistics matters!)

The only reason the kid is "safer" there is cameras are rolling. And even then, that's only with your definition of immediate risk. Take away the camera element, and I'd much prefer my kid be... pretty much anywhere else that is "approved" by society to exist.

3
Kweebecker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it? As far as I've seen, some cities' populations are basically pillars of salt.

1
Kweebecker 1 point ago +3 / -2

Socialism: Together, the workers unite! Hammer AND sickle, together, unified, the same!

Fascism: Each individual is weak as a twig, but together, they make a mighty faggot, as shown in the symbol of fascism, the fasces.Together, unified, the same!

They're both freaky-deaky loony-lefty ideologies at their core. Sure, they're not the same, but they're both flavors of communism. Socialism is Communism Lite, and Fascism is Diet Communism.

The "ZOG" as it is generally seen, meanwhile, are very much right-wing. Their ideology is very much an ordered hierarchy with clearly demarcated castes. It's just not the right wing caste system that supports the complainants at any of the upper castes.

1
Kweebecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

The better question is why aren't they to yours?

1
Kweebecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a white man voiced a black man in a CurrentYear cartoon, there would be an outcry that his whiteness is infecting and taking over the black man's body, consuming it entirely and making him effectively white. That logic can therefore be applied here as well, but with black man voicing white man. Jones' work overrides and consumes the portrayal.

5
Kweebecker 5 points ago +5 / -0

The option of skipping one specific kind of sex just never occurred to her, I guess.

9
Kweebecker 9 points ago +9 / -0

Remember, inclusivity is evil. Everyone being represented is wrong.

Everyone being segregated, isolated in their own tiny units, is woke and proper progressive.

18
Kweebecker 18 points ago +18 / -0

I can talk about it, sure, but I didn't watch it. Or 2. Or 1. Because it's Disneytrash.

4
Kweebecker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ah yes, demisexuals. Also known as tautologisexuals. "I'm only attracted to people I'm attracted to". Truly the bravest of the rainbow squadron.

4
Kweebecker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Women's war isn't Korea's problem.

Isn't Korea led by a weird feminist cult? Like, legitimately an actual matriarchal cult?

Women's war seems to fit right into their mission statement.

2
Kweebecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

How many people know the names of Ghislaine Maxwell's customers?

Exactly as long as the arkancide conspiracy theory list plus one.

18
Kweebecker 18 points ago +18 / -0

3.5k tweets a month

30 days in a month.

~115 tweets in a day.

Assume 10 hours for eating/sleeping.

~8 tweets an hour, or one made every 7 minutes or so like machine clockwork, every waking moment.

11
Kweebecker 11 points ago +12 / -1

Obviously. If you preferred their opinion, you'd switch yours to theirs, so not much point in voicing something self-evident.

12
Kweebecker 12 points ago +12 / -0

Remember, their stated goal is "you will own nothing, and you will be happy about it." Not some crazy intuited goal, that was in their vision and mission statement presentation as a matter of public record.

It isn't "we will own nothing". Just you. They will control and own everything, and own and control you in turn. They're acting well within their mission statement.

5
Kweebecker 5 points ago +5 / -0

To lose your V-card?

I'm no tradcuck, but...

  1. The ones who are likely to fuck you within an hour or two of meeting you are, 80% chance, huge sluts. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I don't know if you have all your shots and free healthcare for the STDs.

1.5) Of the remaining 20%, 15% are out to ruin your life. "Nerd" cons are densely packed with the Woken Ones compared to the average population, and remember, for them, being raped is a point of pride and profit... So they'll make the situation happen even if it didn't quite happen-happen. Make sure to have a filter/screening process.

1.75) That last 5%? Desperate foreveralone women. They're going to be miserable when they realize what they've done, and while that's not really any concern to you since they won't act on it, remember that a woman merely having one partner before marriage raises the divorce chance by nearly double, so getting your dick wet is a pre-emptive homewrecking. Not your problem, but you'd not want it in turn when you seek marriage partners. Your own divorce rate will wind up going up as well, even if by not as much. Keep it in mind.

  1. You'll note that was 100%. There is no "good relationships" in that grouping. For that result, instead of trying to get laid, try to make a connection, and treat the con as a first date.

But if you want to go for it, there's enough con sluts at most of them. Find a parking lot rave at night, find a girl with a animal tail buttplug, wear protection, and don't take any candy she offers if she's wearing a soother.

8
Kweebecker 8 points ago +10 / -2

You're the one going on about saving "our people", then clearly marking yourself as not being a part of the conversational group.

We'll save our people, sure! Just like you asked!

You're not one of them. "Our people" isn't a race or sex or religion or langauge, we're faceless internet posters.

To be grammatically correct, next time, say "please save MY people, who are notably distinct from you, at cost to yourself but no benefit."

4
Kweebecker 4 points ago +4 / -0

The sheer amount of overtly poisonous and/or maliciously-usable plants that are grown all over for "aesthetics" is something I just can't quite get. Like, sure, if you want to kill all the neighborhood rats, raccoons, dogs, and children, then yeah, grow massive bushes of brightly colored berries that'll kill a full-grown adult.

Not saying there should be a law against it categorically, but I know in my area, if marijuana grows in my garden, I'm in trouble. If poison ivy is being purposefully grown in my garden, I'm in trouble. But foxglove? Perfectly fine. High or itchy bad, dead as a doornail good. Gardening laws make no sense at all.

view more: Next ›