(x) Doubt?

I couldn't stand the underground railroad from fallout 3. That was all that was needed to deter me from buying fallout 4. Anything further left than 3 is a hard no.

Which is funny. It's pretty much universal that NV is the only fallout that people bother playing as opposed to 3 and 4.

Yuppp.

But the second book was shit. The first book was already their best shot and they wasted it. The day some pirated/fanedited movie version of the book just rips entire scenes from other movies and mashes them together into an underground version of the movie is the day it'll do the book justice. Until then, all the collective IPs are too expensive to portray.

Nobody believes you. The man has Hillary Clinton levels of Judicial corruption in his favor.

I'm surprised you don't know that The Sims 4 has got a million adult mods going for it. And it's free, so it's basically a giant porn fantasy generator. But for actual gameplay? Sims 3 > 4 seems to be the consensus.

Assasin's Creed Revelations. I was sold a lie from the hype, but some basic research would have saved me the $5-6 bucks or whatever it cost.

Shit keeps losing money, they're supposed to fire them. I dunno, makes perfect sense to me.

I'm glad gaming peaked between 2009-2014.

Everything is dirt cheap, got a million mods to upgrade from, and guaranteed to be good quality. With the notable exception of Assasins Creed Revelations, I got exactly what I expected from digging for old classics.

"Please use our shitty app"

Honestly the world could do with more extremity. FUCK moderation. Why do calls for centrism and "adults in the room" always swing left?

I refuse to watch dubs on principle. Whatever principle you can have watching anime. The astroturfed comments that keep popping up with "This one dub is just as good as the original" are basically always from the dubbing industry themselves. I refuse to believe that dubs garner real fans. They belong in the same pit that people pretending Succession is amazing, people pretending the Boys is biting political commentary, and people pretending (name the latest piece of shit on steam) is a good game do.

Eh. Fuck your rights. They clearly don't exist. If the only thing rights do is handicap the right, then I'm open to the idea that I was lied to about whether or not they're actually holding society together or not. The only two intangible concepts I do see upholding modern society aren't rights at all, they're:

"fuck white people"

and

"for israel"

I'm not even white or antisemetic. It's just so obviously tribes all the way down.

I see a GIANT wall of text. Must be left wing.

So Milo was right all along.

I don't see our enemies giving up power just because we want them to. They screech about activist politics because the elites want us to be on our knees, not because anything that comes out of the arguments hold any merits. The Climate Change Tax credits aren't for Climate Change, they're for the Taxation. Remember what AA says, everything is just power power power.

Optional. But both can work.

This guy gets it. You have to read good english to duplicate good english.

I don't know a single right winger who is anti-trump. Just a load of RINOs pretending to conservative. He's a pretty good litmus test.

Is that plebbit? Place is infested with Commies and Bots. Although some, I assume, are good subreddits.

Ban refrigerators because only women should be allowed to be cold and expensive.

I'm keeping this one.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

God doesn't exist. But magic government does.

What about this screams country music to you? The bouncer should have kicked him out.

I still don't understand the appeal for these guys. Are they actually gay or do they want to appear gay so they can approach liberal women without scaring them off?

It's his race as well. He might be a great guy, looks after his mom, his kids look up to him, knows his local grocer who works down the street, he still wouldn't be Scottish. His children might become Scottish, but he isn't, and he's making all the signals that he intends to wage war on the very constituency he's supposed to represent. If Peterson has an academical liberal-minded issue with drawing distinctions about ethnicities and national loyalties, he should voice them out loud. He's more than skilled enough at saying "I don't think we should talk about Whiteness because of this and this." He's skilled enough to actually make those arguments.