So we recently heard that the Dems are throwing down $20M to figure out why they cant connect with male (especially young male) voters, and this is apparently one of the early talks. Within this whole discussion we have (but not limited to):
Hiring a woman to tell them what men want (lol).
Dem's policies are fine, it is just bad messaging that makes people not realize they would like it.
A soyboy cuck declaring men want to be bad and do bad things like dominate and rape women, and Republicans do well because they indulge in that impulse.
She-Troll thinks that being an oil field roughneck and an Amazon warehouse worker are the same tier of job. Also thinks that said roughnecks are struggling to make ends meet despite being one of the highest paid jobs in the country.
Both are extremely dismissive of immigration and think that people only think it is a problem because they were told it is one.
Both think the problem Dems have connecting with voters is because they come off as "dorks" who are overly concerned with policies, instead of connecting emotionally with voters "like Trump does."
Ultimately, they conclude that the solution is to start pandering to male voters like they do other racial and gender groups, but make it so that it doesnt sound like pandering as that does turn off male voters.
Also thinks that said roughnecks are struggling to make ends meet despite being one of the highest paid jobs in the country.
I mean, if you see most of them you would think they were making peanuts. Its an extreme problem in the industry of the guys taking their absurdly high pay, and then spending it like new lotto winners until they can barely make their bill payments.
Most of my male family members were oilfield for life, and half of them could barely escape the trailer park despite coming home with easy multiple 5 figure monthly incomes. And the toll it takes on your body catches up fast, meaning they go from loaded to broke quickly because aforementioned poor spending habits mean zero savings.
So them saying this shows how little thought they actually put into anything, because while it looks like it at the end result, the life leading up to that is entirely different and filled with far more unique challenges.
They just thought "conservative, low IQ workers must be failing at life because that's how it works!"
I know, my point being is that its an observation that you can make offhandedly, and that the assumption you make for why it is so can say a lot about your implicit biases.
Such as the fact that their struggles are nearly identical to the common black guys (poverty backgrounds, sudden rushes of money, materialistic spending), yet they think extremely lowly of these men while fluffing the nigger.
A lot of people, maybe most people, will just make any amount of money they make vanish into thin air for absolutely no visible benefit to themselves except maybe a newer car once in a while. If we didn't have Social Security to set some of their money aside and give it back in carefully controlled amounts they'd be totally done for by retirement age.
Ultimately, they conclude that the solution is to start pandering to male voters like they do other racial and gender groups, but make it so that it doesnt sound like pandering as that does turn off male voters.
But they can't. Their pandering to other groups isn't just saying "We think you're better than white men", it's also backed up by policy discriminating in favor of those groups. You can't discriminate in favor of everyone, and at this point, even simply not discriminating against men is an extreme right-wing position and would never even be considered by any politically viable democrat.
You can't pander to a group in your messaging while actively discriminating against them at every level of society and expect them not to notice the discrepancy eventually. Especially if all your messaging up to that point was the opposite.
I will add this: the disconnect with Democrats is not recent. It goes back a long way, much longer than most of you are even aware. To illustrate, I remind everyone of one of Ronald Regan's famous one line zingers: "The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
He said that in 1964, while stumping for Barry Goldwater.
The same Barry Goldwater that the infamous "daisy" TV advertisement was created to attack.
Do you recognize the moral slander inherent in that ad?
Much as we like to think things have only recently gotten this divided, it is not a recent thing. New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael famously remarked in 1972 that she didn't know a Nixon voter:
I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them.
I've been conservative for over 40 years, and lived through Reagan and all that followed. In all that time, national level Democrats were always disconnected from regular normal people, but now this extends to nearly all of them.
Ultimately, they conclude that the solution is to start pandering to male voters like they do other racial and gender groups, but make it so that it doesnt sound like pandering as that does turn off male voters.
It would also turn off the groups they actually cater to since their whole brand is scapegoating the hated straight white male and giving everyone else free shit on his dime.
Do the Dems actually believe that their issue with young men is anything other than a policy issue? If a fat, short, uncharismatic, balding in his mid thirties dude ran on an America First platform (immigration, economy, cultural) and actually was able to implement it, he’d be the most popular politician in a long time among his supporters. The messenger does not matter as much as the message and the action that comes from it.
Until the DNC radically changes its positions on several things, they will continue to lose young male voters to the right.
Do the Dems actually believe that their issue with young men is anything other than a policy issue?
Yes, its why they constantly rally against guys like Joe Rogan. They truly think that if he didn't say wrongthink, then people wouldn't think it either. A huge undercurrent of Leftist thought is that humans are mostly blank slates and are products of their environment (until its a positive thing, then its all natural to blacks/women/gays), so if they can control the world they can make everyone agree with them.
I think they really do, because I have heard from so many sources in Democrat circles of all of their people who decide the direction of the party continuing to say their policies are fine, it is just a messaging problem. Not realizing that it very much is a policy problem, not a messaging problem. They even say it in that very video. "Most men are pro-choice, pro-immigration, and pro-BLM, they just dont vote for us because we have turned them off by making people think we hate them." Meanwhile, poll after poll shows that men are none of those things, and are absolutely against everything the Dems actually stand for, and no amount of sugar coating it will make them accept it.
Yeah they can pretend to like me all they want, but their policies almost always involve me paying more (taxes, opportunities, etc) for someone else to succeed over me. Be it women, non-whites, illegals, "refugees", etc
Basically every single possible intersection or category of person besides myself gets a boost and all I get is more taxes and inflation, less protections from savages, less opportunities at school or work, you name it.
Yeah they really believe it. To understand, you've got to realize what a low opinion they have of the American voter. The disdain Hollywood has for its audience is a perfect analog for it. They make the movies/policy they want to. If no one votes for them or goes to see it, it's the masses fault. It's not a bad product you see. The rabble just aren't educated enough! If only they have a bigger marketing budget next time, astroturfed harder, and used more hip jargon then those idiots would realize that the product wasn't a steaming pile of shit.
That policy can make or break a candidate isn't something that even crosses their mind. They won't change the product, only the advertising. They won't even be able to win back labor unless they do a 180 on immigration.
Dems and leftists in general ALL believe their policy positions are PERFECT.
The ONLY reason others might disagree with them is because they "just don't understand them well enough". See, they are so smart & we are so dumb! Inclusivity at its finest, eh?
Education is all that is needed for utopia. Let the boxcars roll.
It's the perepetual liberal problem. Their understanding is narrow focussed because education has told them to look at everything in isolation. They've got to get their heads out of their asses and realise the broader picture and where those things fit, and what they affect, matters just as much.
Which will never happen because they view themselves with that same narrow focussed isolation.
She is apparently supposed to be their "man whisperer." No, I'm serious. She is totally great at chatting it up and flirting with the frat boys, trust me bro.
They're so up their own asses with presentation that they cripple themselves right out of the gate. I'll explain.
The thumbnail for this video is a hambeast and some sort of ladyboy. With this I already see a handful of bad life choices and I am immediately dissuaded from watching them. Their immediate purpose is to persuade people who don't agree with them currently. In order to subject myself to watching this, I would have to have the mindset that these people are my peers, somewhere approximate in respectability to myself, that their opinions are valid, and I respect their right to be put front and center and should hear them out.
And right there this goes off the rails.
The left has no idea how regular people operate and perceive them and they're constantly parading their biggest, weirdest mouths out to the public as if they don't come off like basement dwellers. They have an extreme relatability deficit.
I hope they never realize this. Let them keep throwing money at these abhumans as prime specimens of their culture. They can crash and burn until they come correct.
It's weird that I'm thinking of Asmon like a guy who's wearing a hazmat suit who comes up every few days to show us some new, abnormal toxic relic he found in the depths.
Yeah Asmongold does some good videos about current happenings, but way too many are "oh wow I was mentioned by someone else let me make a 30 minute reaction about it" which are skippable
You know every DEI, non-average-man hire you made in the past 15 years? JUST FIRE ALL OF THEM. You know every pro-woman, pro-gay, pro-race, and anti-average-man rule you instated in the past 15 years? JUST GET RID OF THEM.
When I saw the thumbnail I thought that dude was a lesbian. Both of these people should probably see an endocrinologist.
People often make jabs like as if it's a personal failing to have zero test or be 150lbs overweight but we are poisoning people left and right, these people need medical help. Damn near everyone does.
So we recently heard that the Dems are throwing down $20M to figure out why they cant connect with male (especially young male) voters, and this is apparently one of the early talks. Within this whole discussion we have (but not limited to):
Hiring a woman to tell them what men want (lol).
Dem's policies are fine, it is just bad messaging that makes people not realize they would like it.
A soyboy cuck declaring men want to be bad and do bad things like dominate and rape women, and Republicans do well because they indulge in that impulse.
She-Troll thinks that being an oil field roughneck and an Amazon warehouse worker are the same tier of job. Also thinks that said roughnecks are struggling to make ends meet despite being one of the highest paid jobs in the country.
Both are extremely dismissive of immigration and think that people only think it is a problem because they were told it is one.
Both think the problem Dems have connecting with voters is because they come off as "dorks" who are overly concerned with policies, instead of connecting emotionally with voters "like Trump does."
Ultimately, they conclude that the solution is to start pandering to male voters like they do other racial and gender groups, but make it so that it doesnt sound like pandering as that does turn off male voters.
I mean, if you see most of them you would think they were making peanuts. Its an extreme problem in the industry of the guys taking their absurdly high pay, and then spending it like new lotto winners until they can barely make their bill payments.
Most of my male family members were oilfield for life, and half of them could barely escape the trailer park despite coming home with easy multiple 5 figure monthly incomes. And the toll it takes on your body catches up fast, meaning they go from loaded to broke quickly because aforementioned poor spending habits mean zero savings.
So them saying this shows how little thought they actually put into anything, because while it looks like it at the end result, the life leading up to that is entirely different and filled with far more unique challenges.
They just thought "conservative, low IQ workers must be failing at life because that's how it works!"
Fair point, but that is a consequence of poor spending habits and not necessarily poor policy like it would be with what the Left wants to do.
I know, my point being is that its an observation that you can make offhandedly, and that the assumption you make for why it is so can say a lot about your implicit biases.
Such as the fact that their struggles are nearly identical to the common black guys (poverty backgrounds, sudden rushes of money, materialistic spending), yet they think extremely lowly of these men while fluffing the nigger.
A lot of people, maybe most people, will just make any amount of money they make vanish into thin air for absolutely no visible benefit to themselves except maybe a newer car once in a while. If we didn't have Social Security to set some of their money aside and give it back in carefully controlled amounts they'd be totally done for by retirement age.
Ironically, the government already spent the Social Security fund. The only "assets" in it are Treasuries, i.e. glorified IOUs.
That's because they're retarded. Oil fielders could retire in half a decade to a part time gig if they didnt have negative IQ
But they can't. Their pandering to other groups isn't just saying "We think you're better than white men", it's also backed up by policy discriminating in favor of those groups. You can't discriminate in favor of everyone, and at this point, even simply not discriminating against men is an extreme right-wing position and would never even be considered by any politically viable democrat.
You can't pander to a group in your messaging while actively discriminating against them at every level of society and expect them not to notice the discrepancy eventually. Especially if all your messaging up to that point was the opposite.
*Some disgusting blob
Do 👏 better 👏 sweaty
You pretty much nail it.
I will add this: the disconnect with Democrats is not recent. It goes back a long way, much longer than most of you are even aware. To illustrate, I remind everyone of one of Ronald Regan's famous one line zingers: "The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
He said that in 1964, while stumping for Barry Goldwater.
The same Barry Goldwater that the infamous "daisy" TV advertisement was created to attack.
Do you recognize the moral slander inherent in that ad?
Much as we like to think things have only recently gotten this divided, it is not a recent thing. New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael famously remarked in 1972 that she didn't know a Nixon voter:
https://www.commentary.org/john-podhoretz/the-actual-pauline-kael-quote%E2%80%94not-as-bad-and-worse/
I've been conservative for over 40 years, and lived through Reagan and all that followed. In all that time, national level Democrats were always disconnected from regular normal people, but now this extends to nearly all of them.
Are you that goofball that killed an albatross?
It would also turn off the groups they actually cater to since their whole brand is scapegoating the hated straight white male and giving everyone else free shit on his dime.
Go on Faggot and the Fat Chick tell us about masculinity
Faggot & the Fat Chick
Coming this Fall, only on Disney Plus!
I'm sure they already planned the spinoff, Nigger and the Tranny
That's the Netflix adaptation.
Do the Dems actually believe that their issue with young men is anything other than a policy issue? If a fat, short, uncharismatic, balding in his mid thirties dude ran on an America First platform (immigration, economy, cultural) and actually was able to implement it, he’d be the most popular politician in a long time among his supporters. The messenger does not matter as much as the message and the action that comes from it.
Until the DNC radically changes its positions on several things, they will continue to lose young male voters to the right.
Yes, its why they constantly rally against guys like Joe Rogan. They truly think that if he didn't say wrongthink, then people wouldn't think it either. A huge undercurrent of Leftist thought is that humans are mostly blank slates and are products of their environment (until its a positive thing, then its all natural to blacks/women/gays), so if they can control the world they can make everyone agree with them.
I think they really do, because I have heard from so many sources in Democrat circles of all of their people who decide the direction of the party continuing to say their policies are fine, it is just a messaging problem. Not realizing that it very much is a policy problem, not a messaging problem. They even say it in that very video. "Most men are pro-choice, pro-immigration, and pro-BLM, they just dont vote for us because we have turned them off by making people think we hate them." Meanwhile, poll after poll shows that men are none of those things, and are absolutely against everything the Dems actually stand for, and no amount of sugar coating it will make them accept it.
Yeah they can pretend to like me all they want, but their policies almost always involve me paying more (taxes, opportunities, etc) for someone else to succeed over me. Be it women, non-whites, illegals, "refugees", etc
Basically every single possible intersection or category of person besides myself gets a boost and all I get is more taxes and inflation, less protections from savages, less opportunities at school or work, you name it.
Yeah they really believe it. To understand, you've got to realize what a low opinion they have of the American voter. The disdain Hollywood has for its audience is a perfect analog for it. They make the movies/policy they want to. If no one votes for them or goes to see it, it's the masses fault. It's not a bad product you see. The rabble just aren't educated enough! If only they have a bigger marketing budget next time, astroturfed harder, and used more hip jargon then those idiots would realize that the product wasn't a steaming pile of shit.
That policy can make or break a candidate isn't something that even crosses their mind. They won't change the product, only the advertising. They won't even be able to win back labor unless they do a 180 on immigration.
Dems and leftists in general ALL believe their policy positions are PERFECT.
The ONLY reason others might disagree with them is because they "just don't understand them well enough". See, they are so smart & we are so dumb! Inclusivity at its finest, eh?
Education is all that is needed for utopia. Let the boxcars roll.
It's the perepetual liberal problem. Their understanding is narrow focussed because education has told them to look at everything in isolation. They've got to get their heads out of their asses and realise the broader picture and where those things fit, and what they affect, matters just as much.
Which will never happen because they view themselves with that same narrow focussed isolation.
Is the plan to have her threaten to eat people who won't vote D?
Or maybe she will threaten to get naked
She is apparently supposed to be their "man whisperer." No, I'm serious. She is totally great at chatting it up and flirting with the frat boys, trust me bro.
Maybe the actual plan is to rely on gravity and the real power was the mass she picked up along the way... from the food court.
They're so up their own asses with presentation that they cripple themselves right out of the gate. I'll explain.
The thumbnail for this video is a hambeast and some sort of ladyboy. With this I already see a handful of bad life choices and I am immediately dissuaded from watching them. Their immediate purpose is to persuade people who don't agree with them currently. In order to subject myself to watching this, I would have to have the mindset that these people are my peers, somewhere approximate in respectability to myself, that their opinions are valid, and I respect their right to be put front and center and should hear them out.
And right there this goes off the rails.
The left has no idea how regular people operate and perceive them and they're constantly parading their biggest, weirdest mouths out to the public as if they don't come off like basement dwellers. They have an extreme relatability deficit.
I hope they never realize this. Let them keep throwing money at these abhumans as prime specimens of their culture. They can crash and burn until they come correct.
It's weird that I'm thinking of Asmon like a guy who's wearing a hazmat suit who comes up every few days to show us some new, abnormal toxic relic he found in the depths.
Yeah Asmongold does some good videos about current happenings, but way too many are "oh wow I was mentioned by someone else let me make a 30 minute reaction about it" which are skippable
You know every DEI, non-average-man hire you made in the past 15 years? JUST FIRE ALL OF THEM. You know every pro-woman, pro-gay, pro-race, and anti-average-man rule you instated in the past 15 years? JUST GET RID OF THEM.
When I saw the thumbnail I thought that dude was a lesbian. Both of these people should probably see an endocrinologist.
People often make jabs like as if it's a personal failing to have zero test or be 150lbs overweight but we are poisoning people left and right, these people need medical help. Damn near everyone does.
She has more chins than a chinese phonebook!
What a walrus.
America should invade that. All that oil will be great to fuck OPEC over with!