What an amazing idea. Find a woman and make children with her. Why didn't we think of that?
I would have the baby at my place on the weekend, we would share finances and we would create a Family Day ― one day dedicated to our all being together ― that we would share each week.
It's annoying for single fathers. It's assumed by so many people that men just don't make good parents or don't do parenting at all, while single mothers are "super women" and can do it all. As a single father myself, I honestly get angry when women give me the stink eye and ask if my daughter is mine whenever I take her to the park. Of course she's mine, Karen, stop assuming all men are rapists. I get the same shit when I use the changing stations literally anywhere, "Is it Mommy's day off?" No bitch, this is my child and there is no "mommy."
Yes all of that is an annoyance. On the level of being asked about your diet for losing weight but think of the cancer patients, debilitating diseases and drug addiction!
But in the story linked, it was, indeed, mommy's day off ( he cared for the child on the week-ends ).
I’m not a single dad, but I feel you. The “is it mom’s day off” bullshit is annoying. No bitch, it isn’t mom’s day off, it’s just me being a responsible parent and a decent husband and actually giving a shit and wanting to be involved in my daughter’s life.
At least in those cases we still get the odd friendly smile here and there. When I’m out with my 3 year old SON however, it’s nothing but open disdain and filthy looks. Like “keep that future rapist away from me”. People are retarded assholes, the cultural Marxism has completely acid washed their common sense.
As a father it’s your duty to “unteach” your kids everything they’re gonna be brainwashed with in school. Have to teach your daughters that everything they do isn’t automatically perfect and wonderful, and you have to teach your sons that everything they do isn’t automatically evil.
Hopefully in one or two generations people won’t be so fuckin stupid anymore
In 2012, I was in a Starbucks when a well-intentioned grandmotherly type approached me and asked what so many others have asked me over the previous two years when they saw me alone with Nate: “Is it Mommy’s day off today? Are you babysitting?” Unfortunately for her, she chose the wrong guy and the wrong day to inquire and I told her what I’d been itching to tell the dozens of people who had asked me similar questions before. “I’m gay,”
Nobody fucking asked!
Okay, so this guy is an utter faggot in addition to being an actual faggot, and he's someone who shouldn't be in charge of raising a kid. But in theory, I don't think it's so bad for a gay person to embrace a normal, heterosexual arrangement for the sake of parenthood. This is of course assuming he's just a faggot, and not an utter faggot. It's just that a faggot qualified to raise a kid is so astronomically rare.
I guess my position isn't so much that gay people should be having children (you're right that there is a risk there, and I think a child is going to be negatively impacted by being raised by a gay parent no matter what) as I like to see gay people embracing family values and pulling back from degeneracy.
If gay people embrace family values, that’s called being straight.
Gay men cannot be a family. A family requires sexual differences. The point of the family is the production, education, and moral formation of the next generation of humans. Two men cannot do that, and if they do purchase a child a la Dave Ruben, they are depriving that child of their mother. A sick, disgusting act that should be punished.
I’m sick of pretending their fetish is a valid lifestyle. Bring back shame, sodomy laws, and we will return to a strong nation.
So he legally chained himself to a modern woman when he's not even interested in the one benefit they offer? If he wanted a kid he had options that aren't so legally perilous.
I was thinking surrogacy, although that's less airtight than previously thought in light of a recent family court decision. But he's also a faggot, so adoption is probably a lot more negotiable for him than it would be for a straight man.
Surrogacy might work if it's something like India, first world countries won't let single men use surrogacy. Even he's able to get surrogacy in 3rd word countries, getting papers to take the baby into the US might be just as difficult
I've known plenty of self proclaimed 'gay men' in my life who have bragged about the number of straight woman they have slept with. In his case, what is the point? Two decades of denial, to what be a contrarian? So, that he can tell people his dick is only for poop, and not vag?
Reminds me of a story about a local gay/lesbian activist couple.
They hit it off and became friends, so they moved in together to save rent. One night they got drunk, she climbed into bed with him, and they had sex, which became a regular occurrence. Then she needed health insurance, so he married her. Finally she wanted a baby so he became her "sperm donor."
Throughout it all they both insisted they were 100% homosexual. Everything they did was just friendly and consequences of ebil capitalism and heteronormativity.
Something that is openly discussed in the gay community but never discussed publicly is the huge amount of turnover. Its difficult enough to make people gay, even harder to keep them gay. 90% of gay men and 99% of lesbians quit within 10 years. Heterosexuality is easy, being gay requires you to live in a constant state of rejecting nature. You can only do that for so long before you go insane.
I once had a lesbian coworker who had been previously married, she hoped her daughter never went lesbian. I asked why and she said "it's impossible to find anyone." And I lived in one of the gayest cities in America, during the extremely pro-LGBT 2000s.
In 2012, I was in a Starbucks when a well-intentioned grandmotherly type approached me and asked what so many others have asked me over the previous two years when they saw me alone with Nate: “Is it Mommy’s day off today? Are you babysitting?”
All women should be backhanded for saying such a thing to a father. This little paragraphs reeks of "that happened," but this has always rankled me. It's just more poison from feminism that men are less capable with children than women.
raising Nate and being a positive example of what a loving, modern family looks like.
Unfortunately, this child will be ruined by the exposure to a broken and unnatural home his whole life. Their union is a frankenstein of science and ignorance, which will perpetuate as the modern lie of what family is supposed to mean continues to be broadcast from every media outlet still in control of Commies and their ilk.
Modern degeneracy
Also featuring vintage degeneracy.
What an amazing idea. Find a woman and make children with her. Why didn't we think of that?
So they got pre-divorced?
They look ewish
Imagine getting triggered all the way up to 11 because someone asked if it was ''mommy's day off'' and not simply answer the truth : yes it is.
But instead make a scene with your child in public to reeee about ''non heteronormative parenting''.
Also, odd choice of friend down the article ( a sex pest bragging about ''3 players adult activities'' as what's to be enjoyed in life. ).
I assume he met that friend because he hangs with that sort of men.
It's annoying for single fathers. It's assumed by so many people that men just don't make good parents or don't do parenting at all, while single mothers are "super women" and can do it all. As a single father myself, I honestly get angry when women give me the stink eye and ask if my daughter is mine whenever I take her to the park. Of course she's mine, Karen, stop assuming all men are rapists. I get the same shit when I use the changing stations literally anywhere, "Is it Mommy's day off?" No bitch, this is my child and there is no "mommy."
Yes all of that is an annoyance. On the level of being asked about your diet for losing weight but think of the cancer patients, debilitating diseases and drug addiction!
But in the story linked, it was, indeed, mommy's day off ( he cared for the child on the week-ends ).
I’m not a single dad, but I feel you. The “is it mom’s day off” bullshit is annoying. No bitch, it isn’t mom’s day off, it’s just me being a responsible parent and a decent husband and actually giving a shit and wanting to be involved in my daughter’s life.
At least in those cases we still get the odd friendly smile here and there. When I’m out with my 3 year old SON however, it’s nothing but open disdain and filthy looks. Like “keep that future rapist away from me”. People are retarded assholes, the cultural Marxism has completely acid washed their common sense.
As a father it’s your duty to “unteach” your kids everything they’re gonna be brainwashed with in school. Have to teach your daughters that everything they do isn’t automatically perfect and wonderful, and you have to teach your sons that everything they do isn’t automatically evil.
Hopefully in one or two generations people won’t be so fuckin stupid anymore
If it's a stranger, tell her "no, mommy died 3 months ago" with the best solemn face you can manage.
Shocked that yahoo would print this story. Shocked I tells ya
It's shocking
It is and convenient how the son is gay
Child molestation is how they reproduce.
In literal terms, a sexually transmitted disease.
Nobody fucking asked!
Okay, so this guy is an utter faggot in addition to being an actual faggot, and he's someone who shouldn't be in charge of raising a kid. But in theory, I don't think it's so bad for a gay person to embrace a normal, heterosexual arrangement for the sake of parenthood. This is of course assuming he's just a faggot, and not an utter faggot. It's just that a faggot qualified to raise a kid is so astronomically rare.
Personally, I don’t think gay people should be around children at all, but that’s just me.
I guess my position isn't so much that gay people should be having children (you're right that there is a risk there, and I think a child is going to be negatively impacted by being raised by a gay parent no matter what) as I like to see gay people embracing family values and pulling back from degeneracy.
If gay people embrace family values, that’s called being straight.
Gay men cannot be a family. A family requires sexual differences. The point of the family is the production, education, and moral formation of the next generation of humans. Two men cannot do that, and if they do purchase a child a la Dave Ruben, they are depriving that child of their mother. A sick, disgusting act that should be punished.
I’m sick of pretending their fetish is a valid lifestyle. Bring back shame, sodomy laws, and we will return to a strong nation.
I hope everyone clapped
So he legally chained himself to a modern woman when he's not even interested in the one benefit they offer? If he wanted a kid he had options that aren't so legally perilous.
They're not going to let single men adopt
I was thinking surrogacy, although that's less airtight than previously thought in light of a recent family court decision. But he's also a faggot, so adoption is probably a lot more negotiable for him than it would be for a straight man.
Surrogacy might work if it's something like India, first world countries won't let single men use surrogacy. Even he's able to get surrogacy in 3rd word countries, getting papers to take the baby into the US might be just as difficult
Jews sharing their alternate lifestyle like it's valid. Many such cases.
From the mother’s insta: https://www.instagram.com/rnheidi13/p/DA0mfsWthLn/
Those two are going to be in the news again in a couple years for having done horrible things with that child, garunteed.
I've known plenty of self proclaimed 'gay men' in my life who have bragged about the number of straight woman they have slept with. In his case, what is the point? Two decades of denial, to what be a contrarian? So, that he can tell people his dick is only for poop, and not vag?
Should be illegal, perverts having children for their selfish desires and not to raise a healthy productive citizen.
Straight up evil.
Reminds me of a story about a local gay/lesbian activist couple.
They hit it off and became friends, so they moved in together to save rent. One night they got drunk, she climbed into bed with him, and they had sex, which became a regular occurrence. Then she needed health insurance, so he married her. Finally she wanted a baby so he became her "sperm donor."
Throughout it all they both insisted they were 100% homosexual. Everything they did was just friendly and consequences of ebil capitalism and heteronormativity.
Something that is openly discussed in the gay community but never discussed publicly is the huge amount of turnover. Its difficult enough to make people gay, even harder to keep them gay. 90% of gay men and 99% of lesbians quit within 10 years. Heterosexuality is easy, being gay requires you to live in a constant state of rejecting nature. You can only do that for so long before you go insane.
I once had a lesbian coworker who had been previously married, she hoped her daughter never went lesbian. I asked why and she said "it's impossible to find anyone." And I lived in one of the gayest cities in America, during the extremely pro-LGBT 2000s.
Normally you'd think it'd be the other way round. There's a reason "Lesbian Until Graduation" is a thing.
He’s not really gay. I get that he didn’t have sex with her but he still got her pregnant, and he is raising a child with her.
No one's really gay. What would that even mean?
A tale of generational mental illness and abuse.
All women should be backhanded for saying such a thing to a father. This little paragraphs reeks of "that happened," but this has always rankled me. It's just more poison from feminism that men are less capable with children than women.
Unfortunately, this child will be ruined by the exposure to a broken and unnatural home his whole life. Their union is a frankenstein of science and ignorance, which will perpetuate as the modern lie of what family is supposed to mean continues to be broadcast from every media outlet still in control of Commies and their ilk.
There are only 3 possible meanings for this: