3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +5 / -2

Ludditism leads to death.

You adopt your enemies weapons to your own culture, society, traditions, and you defend yourselves.

7
Gizortnik 7 points ago +8 / -1

PPC is the best party in Canada by many miles. I don't trust Poilievre or the Conservatives in the slightest.

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

In fairness, if you put in just "people", you'll probably still find some chinese people in the picture.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will find some of the only black confederate units and show them to you.

20
Gizortnik 20 points ago +20 / -0

No, there's no fixing them.

The problem is that the industry is plagued with people who got their starts working in San Francisco and educated, socialized, all within it. The media and corporations linked themselves together to be staunch Leftist evangelists.

This is actually the fundamental cultural relevance of GamerGate. The consumer uprising never ended, and was already starting prior to 2014. Not even for cultural reasons, but because the corporate industry has been a problem for decades. Gaming, as an industry, has a long habit of being a corrupt industry, but people actually did rebel against it.

GamerGate partly started as a result of the corporate media being threatened by YouTubers who were both doing reviews and walkthroughs. Truth is, they really did lose that fight. That same mechanism of decentralization has been stuck in the industry, and instead of trying to purge it, companies are trying to recruit or manipulate it. Same with the political activists.

The thing that no dissident was able to do, was to actually form game companies. Nor was there an external cultural influence (Gaming was divided between Leftists and Libertarians). As such, Leftism permeated both education and IT, and was the next generation of developers are useless, resentful, mutants who are either from other industries and hate games; or hate games as a "capitalist product".

As such, we will have to continue to build anti-parallel systems, and more explicitly, anti-parallel institutions. As we do so, we will build up people and skillsets (the logistics of a civilization) that is anti-parallel to the intuitions we are subjugated by.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's actually one of the things that is historically useful to show off in Gangs Of New York.

8
Gizortnik 8 points ago +8 / -0

"As much as possible, we want kids to access a lot of things."

I want my kids to have access to guns to defend themselves from you.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

How we know you're old: you looked up the anatomy textbooks for boobs instead of the internet.

7
Gizortnik 7 points ago +7 / -0

Government agents do not have speech rights.

The only time they do is when they are operating entirely outside of their role as a state enforcer.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guys, you can't just listen to 20 seconds of the song and say "so they are turning kids gay." They also sing "we'll convert your children; we'll make them tolerant and fair" meaning they'll turn them from intolerant of gay people to tolerant of gay people.

I never assumed you were going to 'turn the kids gay'. I assumed you were going to rape them. I don't believe in corrective rape like you do.

We both know that your concept of 'tolerance' ends with the kid dead in a ditch somewhere.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

The pedo-left are terminally online as it is, so it makes sense that they would squat there.

18
Gizortnik 18 points ago +18 / -0

So what you're saying is the government created it's own problem, and then used the problem it created to further advance it's own agenda?

Impossibru

20
Gizortnik 20 points ago +20 / -0

I denounce any form of public education. The government and it's slaves clearly can't be trusted to teach anything at this point.

13
Gizortnik 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's Katie Holcomb. She sees this as a moral imperative. What is she doing about this? She's doing it more.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

it can't succeed on it's own merit because it doesn't have merit.

-4
Gizortnik -4 points ago +1 / -5

Right, it's definitely not immigrants. It's certainly not culture.

"It's nothin' but the darkies I tell ya!"

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +3 / -2

It's actually neither, they just want to displace enough people so that every ethnic group can be set against each other in a party-boss style.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was called the "solid south" for a reason.

A lot of Republicans... were dead.

The Republican party had been purged from the South. In the North, the progressives, socialists, and communists made hard appeals to black populations in the early 20th century. This is one of the reasons why WEB DuBois was a rabid communist and civil rights advocate (and note that Civil Rights as a concept is a kind of left-wing idea)

Republicans of the same era (see Teddy Roosevelt) made no explicit appeal to blacks. They simply ran a kind of default American approach. They asserted that blacks would be successful as they developed economic infrastructure, became more educated, became more literate, and embraced Anglo values and behaviors. This is true (see Booker T Washington).

Between these two figures, Washington v. DuBois, DuBois had the full throated support of the Communists and non-White-Supremacist Socialists; whereas Washington only had grassroots support, and had no significant Republican party support. His movement was a major cultural force, but was not antagonistic to Communists. As a result, institutional capture occurred as always.

Since most black Americans lived in the South, and since most black supported Republicans were purged or dead, the only people who could appeal to them were Communists and Socialists who explicitly promised to support them specifically, as blacks. Most of the Dixiecrats were still White Supremacists, so this is where there was serious tension between Racialist Progressives & Black Supporting Communists during the 30's.

White Supremacist racialism really started to become unpopular with the intellectual elites of the political Left by the 40's. This is actually when you see some of the progressive racialists who invented the IQ measurement, reverse course on IQ entirely. The Roosevelt administration is where things really start to tip because while FDR is trying to appeal to Southern-Whites, Elenor is appealing to Southern-Blacks; and both poor blacks and poor whites would benefit from being bribed by welfare measures. (For example, the $25/hr minimum wage for cotton pickers; yes, that's 1933 USD btw. Gold was $35 /oz).

So, if American blacks can't vote Republican without being physically attacked (and because there aren't any), and the Left is beginning to move away from White Racialism, and Communists explicitly seek to support them, and HSBC's are comfortable with Leftwing Intellectualism... well, there's only one direction they can go.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

A little... yes.

I actually played Pokemon Yellow when it first came out, so I've been around for a while.

8
Gizortnik 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don't blame this on the car. Ultra-high-density cities are the enemy, and cars help prevent them. The dedication to building hive cities is the problem.

view more: Next ›