Imagine being so stupid that you think a Fascist government is a Laissez-Faire society. Imagine a Fascist government, which Fascism itself is defined by Socialism, and is literally Italian Trade Unionism, implementing Autarkey a foundational principle of Old Left economic policies; and calling him a capitalist. Imagine an economic doctrine called "National Syndicalism" and thinking that is a capitalist economic doctrine. Imagine that economic policies being imposed on said Fascist after he was unable to join with his allies and die in a bloody war, was to bring Spain into a Neo-Liberal / Fabian Socialist economy; and you actually think that was Franco personally and that it's Laissez-Faire.
Hilarious and Illiterate.
My primary goal in life is teaching normies not to trust computers to the degree they put their faith in.
The truth is, most of what AI is involves conditioning people to appeal to authority. It's not a Machine God, it's The Wizard of Oz.
ICE goes to place that's majority Mexicans and deports criminal
- Mexicans: literally crickets
ICE goes to place that's majority Somali and deports criminal Somalis
- Somalis: complaining while leaving
- Hundreds of random White People: INSURGENCY NOW!
We have to figure out how the hell to fix White people in this country. And to be clear, 2024 Trump basically maxxed them out. He's never gonna get more White voters than that, because the remaining 40% are ultra-Leftists.
Normally, I'd agree, but when it comes to Leftism and Islam, internal violence is so perpetually common that it's really a sorting algorithm. The loser of the conflict gains absolute supremacy. No one will dissent from them, no one will try to revolt against the power structure, and any of the old loyalists will turncoat, die, or flee. It sounds like then this is a good state to keep the Islamic world in. But that's not really my point. My point is that someone will win. The internal violence is just a sorting mechanism. This is, in fact, one of the longest periods of time where the Islamic world. If we were smart, we'd expel all Muslims from all of our countries and point nukes at every Muslim country because one day, they will launch a pre-emptive strike. It's one of the reasons it's good not to have Iran with nukes, they're more likely to use them than the Soviet Union or China were, and the Soviets tried to launch.
The fact that you are arguing this at all shows the level of dishonesty you are actively engaging in. Where you saying the same thing when right wingers were showing "enhanced" AI aerial pictures of the Goode shooting?
Stop making up shit to confuse the general population.
Prolly had a hot shell ejected right at him
Again, stop making shit up.
And im the one who isnt living in reality, this world sure is fucking funny.
Yes, you're living in a world of your own creation and you literally just said so by making up shit that doesn't exist in the evidence we have.
I grant that, but I want to be clear, that wasn't the National Guard. It was the DC Police. The DCPD decided they wanted to lower the crime rate. The National Guard troops just gave the cops breathing room to go on patrol while they stood around aimlessly and looked pretty near federal buildings.
Trump deploying the National Guard to communities that wanted to reduce crime helped them reduce crime themselves. But he only did that a hand full of times. The true drop in crime is coming from the collapse of the inflow across the borders and the mass arrests of criminals via ICE & CPD.
It's like saying "Wow, acid attacks and child rapes had the largest 1 year drop ever since the new Reform government started deporting Pakistani refugees. Is this because of tough on crime policies, or is it because the child rapists are gone?"
People actually don't understand how bad Canada's foreign influence in the US is. In off-cycle elections, the Canadian Left sends literally tens of thousands of activists into the US to work as staffers and campaigners.
It's not just Israel and Qatar that are engaging in massive foreign influence. It's China, Canada, Saudi Arabia, India, Britain, and more.
This was added several years ago. You can still manage these settings and turn them off. You should do it anyway without political guidance because you shouldn't let it dictate your speech as it will change you tone.
This is the legacy of Franco. Socialism in any form, even in the way you think you can control it and can defeat Communists, will still off-shore political initiative to the state from the people, and allow the other Socialists to immediately step in and rape you.
Congratulations, a Reconquista is now required.
This is like when Justin Bieber made a post after the October 7th attacks, and it was a picture of a shelled Gaza, with the words "Praying For Israel" across the front of it. For your own sake, please Mr. Celebrity, shut up immediately.
Edit - Fake post. Good news is that Bieber still gets the most violently dumb take on Twitter.
The point wasn't for him to stop being overthrown (that was a goal since at least the mid 90's). The point was that it no longer justified American or Israeli air strikes on his territory. It bought time, and allowed for fixed-wing air support to stop. Hell, he damn well almost won the war for a minute there.
You're assessment of Iran is just wrong, as they've been engaged in an international irregular warfare campaign to spread the "Islamic Revolution" across the entire region. They're not complete fanatical psychos, but they're also not naive (I wouldn't be surprised if this justifies what amounts to a military coup where the ayatollah is 'tragically killed by the American pig-dog bombing campaign').
Cue the idiot beat-cop going "yeah, it's a 100% match!" and doing no real further investigation into the dude's actual identity.
Agreed, if I showed this to somebody and said this was a video of the shooting from a different angle, 50% would probably buy it until they realized the gun never went off.
To be clear, the Iranian program was never completely made totally out of operation. That would require far more than a few strikes. All that the first raid did was, at best, set them back 5 years. What Trump is demanding now is basically the complete end to their entire nuclear development strategy, in addition to reductions on their ballistic missile capabilities. Meaning zero enrichment. That's not typically an item on the table, even for his own previous administration.
To be honest, it would be best for the Iranians to accept the demand. Assad ended his Chemical Weapons program after that... highly debatable... incident with poison gas. He basically abandoned the program, and then had the Russians guarantee the removal of his stockpiles. Frankly the program never helped him in the Syrian Civil War anyways. The Iranians are better off ending their enrichment and just buying nukes from Pakistan (assuming China and Russia will allow it, which is a hard 'maybe').
And by the way Kienan, unlike what I said last time: yes, this time the armada are in position now, including a vast array of missile interceptors. Suggesting not only an attack, but a heavy Iranian counter-attack as well.
I don't trust the BBC's facial recognition software, because I don't trust that kind of software to be as accurate as it claims (and you can watch a bodycam of an innocent dude going to jail because of those 99.7% matches). However in this case, not only doesn't look like him, he literally falls down in the same way when shoved to the ground. And just to be clear: spitting is Battery on an LEO, and breaking that tail light is criminal damage to property. So, he's actually a perpetual criminal. If the Left were honest (which they are incapable of being), they would be saying he's engaging in Civil Disobedience, and even that is a stretch. He should have been arrested.
And also please note that the gun is holstered over his right butt-cheek (it should be in the small of his back). This actually pushes me closer to the idea that he was trying to draw his gun on the cops. A moment before he was shot in the original video, you can see him having already reached behind his back with his right hand and pulled out a black object. As I suspected, it's the empty holster.
I think he may have intended one of two things: he either pulled the holster thinking the gun was still there to fire on the officers, or pulled the holster thinking the gun was still there to toss the gun away. Either case, this may be, once again, another police shooting where the suspect get shot trying to ditch a gun.
It's not a rote answer when you change the question. The question was "How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast?" Which implies "... breakfast today."
If you change the question, the answer, by definition is likely to change.
May plane always calls me a retard when I'm trying to land. It's very distracting.