How did this even happen without someone recording them doing it?

I dunno. If you compare Kamala's past with Catherine the Great's reputation there are very similar parts (though I don't think Kamala's done anything with a horse, if that story is even accurate for Catherine)

Thanks for the video link.

Firewalk Studio employees had better be firing up their resumes.

I don't know. Given how bad this thing is looking I'd say leaving it off your resume may be a good idea.

That's exactly what I was going to post. "Is there any evidence that X was not" is inherently difficult (likely impossible) to improve regardless of what X is, so the opinion and speaker should be dismissed outright.

Huh, I don't think it's the end of the world, but I fully agree with BLM on this. Of course, I agree with them because of the sheer chaos implementing this will cause but I do agree with them.

Maybe I'm just being too optimistic, but I think that would break reality for normies if they keep dragging it on without any type of messaging about it. If they say "sadly, Biden is gravely ill with Covid, we've got him on a ventilator" or something similar for a bit then being out of sight and eventually passing becomes sad, and explains not being around. But a couple weeks, to say nothing of a couple months, of "oh, the president is fine, just staying out of public view" followed suddenly by "unfortunately he died" has to start lots of people asking questions.

Wow, the guy who was married with a kid who suddenly decided he was a tranny turned out to be a pedo? I'm shocked, shocked I say!

even if she made her career off of falsely imprisoning black people

Don't forget keeping said black people in jail in defiance of the US Supreme Court so the state could have more cheap labor!

When I'd wager there is at least a contingent of them that are throwing her out to not "waste" their real candidates on an already lost battle. And they get all sorts of diversity points for doing so.

That's what I'm hoping. I would much rather Trump was still running vs Biden than Harris, though. She's an idiot, but lots of people will probably easily fall for the "vote for the first black woman president!" line. (On that note, though, I am still going to be a bit nervous up through the DNC. Because Big Mike has all the benefits Kamala has with a lot fewer drawbacks.)

It's not just an observations but along the lines of they are good and we need to continue doing business with them. It feels very odd and forced.

I mean, I'll agree on auto-updates being bad. But defending Crowdstrike isn't at all surprising for the usual suspects. After all, they were involved with helping the DNC and investigating the evils of Orange Man so they must be Good Guys.

Stop, stop, I can only get so excited!

Seriously, though, unanimous consent is BS in most cases, and forcing individual discussions and votes on nominations (or anything) is 99% of the time a good thing. And any ambassador who flies a pride flag over the embassy should have to answer for that (and preferably get fired).

The only bad thing in there is him releasing the holds.

wait, what? They're saying the crowd was in on it? The old saying is 3 people can keep a secret if 2 of them are dead. And they're saying (tens of?) thousands of people at the rally were all in on it and not one of them spilled the beans? Ridiculous.

Jayquan's eyes boggled when he was suddenly facing several hundred first-degree felonies for boosting a muscle car.

Did they get that by saying "one horsepower = the equivalent of one horse?" Either way, that sounds amazing.

Crowdstrike blames a security update of Windows.

A security update of Windows from them that their software pushed out. MS is very good at bricking their own machines with updates, but this one was Crowdstrike's doing not MS's doing.

The fact that the democrats only gave him secret service protection two days ago, after turning him down multiple times (and even then, only doing it cause Trump got shot) hopefully makes RFK just say "screw you" to them even if they try to get him back.

They are so married to DEI they wouldn’t dare remove a black/Indian woman.

Unless they can get another black woman for the ticket. Or, at least someone perceived as a black woman.

So, when the media says they don't want to run the Trump photo because it's "propaganda" for Trump

They have no problem running propaganda AGAINST Trump, like this one, especially when the story behind the picture is a total fake since the mom and kid were never separated and in fact the mom grabbed the kid and ran without telling the rest of the family what was happening and where she was going.

Why you gotta get my hopes up like that? She should get the Alex Jones treatment (and so should a bunch of other people), but we all know that's never going to happen.

I mean, it's more shares of DJT than had been shorted in history combined, and it was the first listed short position on it in 2 months, but I'm sure that's all just a coincidence.

Lets see. A journalist who

1. wrote a book about how "How an innocent young boy (Lee Harvey Oswald) evolved into a killer despite the watching eyes of his mother, his family, and his friends." and,

2. On July 12th, launched a video series "intended to point a spotlight on what this dangerously malignant man says and does" because "there’s little doubt that his defeat is fundamental if we are to avoid the demise of democracy and the ushering in of fascism in America."

is now claiming that an assassination attempt was at least partially faked. At this point, I don't know if I'm physically capable of despising these people more but they keep making me want to try

Thanks for this. I know very little about him, so hopefully will be informative.

Literally, it's what's on the inside that counts.

Why you gotta bring Junior into this? It wasn't his fault, and he never did anything wrong, in fact he helped Teal'c multiple times (and then got replaced with the meds).

Now I want a John Cena vs Hulk Hogan election.

a) Do you actually think game companies care enough to put brigade detection in their auto-flag software? Can you name one that has done it so far?

b) As with the anti-cheat software (which I agree will always be one step behind), whatever restrictions you try to put on the flagging system to prevent abuse will also always be one step behind.