🚩 Marked safe from "Dying For Israel As KIA2 Hysterically Promised"

🚩 Marked safe from "Dying For Israel As KIA2 Hysterically Promised"

🚩 Marked safe from "Dying For Israel As KIA2 Hysterically Promised"

🚩 Marked safe from "Dying For Israel As KIA2 Hysterically Promised"

🚩 Marked safe from "Dying For Israel As KIA2 Hysterically Promised"

Which would immediately result in a massive American involvement, so "I don't want to die for Israel" is not actually your reason.

Also, the "Samson Option", if it's true, essentially means Israel fires their missiles across the entire world, including the US, so you're going to die for Israel anyway with this option.

There's better paths forward than you just getting a chance to blow your load for a few seconds before something worse unfolds.

After Iran is blown up where do you think all the refugees will be headed?

How does us getting involved or not change anything about that? Israel began striking them a week ago without American involvement, do you think that would change this hypothetical of yours at all? The US blew up a mountain. How many refugees are inside the mountain?

A single sortie is hardly "involved".

Should we arm up to genocide all the Arabs now?

The ones who continue to chimp out like stone-age cavemen? Probably.

Half the support I see from people is coupled with the argument of "Iran always screams death to america so they shouldn't get a nuke". So imagine how the support for this strike would be if they could have just controlled their flapping screaming mouths. They may even have been able to get a nuke by staying under the radar.

You have anything to say about this, or did you avoid it for a reason? (you avoided it for a reason)

Allow me to educate you since you're some GED-holding dipshit: Pakistan got a nuke by doing exactly that.

So you agree Islam is the religion of peace?

You won't answer directly, so I'll just pick one of three answers for you:

• "Yes." Okay so you're a leftist Marxist propagandist.

• "No." Okay so Iran doesn't get a nuke because they're the most dangerous of the lot.

• "Maybe." Okay so you're exactly the same kind of shill you just called me.

You won't commit to an answer because you're a cunt.

The Khobar Towers were attacked because our military was staying there. The deaths were USAF personnel.

Yes. Americans. Who were not engaged in any way with hostilities against Iran at the time.

It's a blood debt that should be paid.

You're just fishing for excuses

What the fuck did you just do?

1. We are the 'zionist west', like it or not. I know you struggle with this, but womanlike emotional screaming fits on a forum not only isn't changing that, but it's almost entirely counter-productive because it clearly indicates you aren't a serious person with any plans whatsoever, and everyone can just dig up posts and highlight them and say "look at these lunatics on the far right".

2. You think there's any reality where we stop being the 'zionist west' and all these countries decide to just let bygones be bygones? Or are they going to hold thousand-year-old grudges like all Muslims and jews do?

3. If the possibility exists that they will hate us no matter what, with no foreseeable timeline where that isn't the situation, then it's better to just kill them all before they get to a position to enact their revenge fantasies.

4. Only Muslims and Muslim sympathizers would have a problem with the solution to this particular equation.

"Talk shit, get hit". If Iran didn't want to be assraped they always had the option of just being quiet, but for my entire life they've been incapable of doing that. Everything they do is some performative theatrical tantrum.

Half the support I see from people is coupled with the argument of "Iran always screams death to america so they shouldn't get a nuke". So imagine how the support for this strike would be if they could have just controlled their flapping screaming mouths. They may even have been able to get a nuke by staying under the radar.

But for some reason these swine have a compulsion to chimp out constantly.

That was all the way in the 80s.

Khobar Towers was in the 90s.

And a debt is a debt. Iran never properly paid the price for their bullshit, and I would argue, still hasn't. Hezbollah never shut down, they've just been contained.

Besides, you think Muslims don't believe in decades-long blood debts? Both jews and Muslims worship that shit. jews are still angry at Whites because of fucking Hadrian.

Killing a fuckton of Iranians might be in Israel's favor, but it's also in my favor, both as someone who can't stand Muslims, can't stand pissants on the global stage who run threats they can't back up, and who can't stand the shit Iran has gotten away with in the past.

Israel and Jordan literally were at war at some point. Jordan decided to become a normal country and is a perfectly safe, happy place to visit, and isn't being bombed by Israel right now.

There's something to be said for not being a jabbering whackjob screaming death threats at people infinitely stronger than you.

You realize Malaysia is a Muslim nation too and they cause basically no problems, right? Turkmenistan is also a Muslim nation. Any problems coming form Turkmenistan? How about Kyrgyzstan?

"Islam is the religion of peace" is a meme because of all the fucking terror attacks and bullshit.

Those terror attacks and bullshit overwhelmingly originate from a small handful of Muslim Middle Eastern nations, and the #1 on that list is Iran.

Khobar Towers? Beirut?

If you're "America First", why do you think we don't owe a blood debt to Iran for those?

I'm glad you find the Saudis so trustworthy and peaceful. What religion are they again?

So you're fine with taking out Iran's nuclear program? Your gay little 'gotcha' goes both ways, you realize that, right?

No. I don't care. I wouldn't care if Iran had a nuke either, if Iran at least was capable of pretending to be a normal country. But it's not. It's a retard-tier country, populated by retards, who put retards in charge, who basically signed their own death warrants because of their retarded egos on Twitter.

Like I said: "talk shit, get hit". If Saudi Arabia was as insufferably annoying as Iran I'd feel the same way. But Saudis are capable of acting civilized in ways Iran has never figured out.

"Death to America" might make you feel like a big man but when you're so fucking powerless, gay, and retarded that you can't even survive an Israeli air war for more than 12 hours, you don't get to talk like that.

Ever hear "talk shit get hit"?

If Iran didn't want to die, why did they run their mouths at every opportunity? Saudi Arabia decided to play it cool, and it worked out for them. Iran put retarded loud lunatics in charge.

Fuck the jews and fuck Israel: I want them all dead just to get some payback for having to listen to their infinite streams of dumbass bullshit for decades.

Their "tonight will be rememberd for centuries" empty threat alone should be worth a few thousand Iranian lives.

The Ayatollah and the Mullahs is exactly the government Iranians wanted, so they can die with them. Maybe they should've made better decisions.

You seriously don't realize how different the entire situation would be if Iran didn't feel the need to scream threats every other week for half a century? Believe it or not "I don't like israel" doesn't come with some kind of requirement to Virtue Signal your intent to kill them and destroy America ad nauseum. Even just pretending to be 'normal' would've changed things dramatically for them.

Only weak people make threats like that, Iran is weak, and the weak exist to be consumed by the strong. Welcome to the real world.

Iran chose a stupid path and now gets to die a stupid death. Not sure why you guys have a problem with this. I prefer consequences like this.

Now you destroy the Middle East because jews told you to.

If someone broke in to my house and a jew told me to shoot them, I'm not going to not shoot them because a jew told me to do so.

Muslims are savages, Muslim nations are worthless places. "We should be nice to Muslims because jews want us to hate them" is a retarded take. Iran literally has promised to kill Americans for 46 years straight. This isn't some nation that was just minding its own business.

Anybody who shouts threats for 46 years deserves to be punched in the face. If they can't back up their threats, it's just even more proof they shouldn't have been talking shit and you should hit them even harder to punish them.

The fact that none of you can wrap your tiny minds around the possibility of hating both groups is why you all look like Leftist propagandists. The fact that you're saying "you" reinforces that.

Arent you tired of fighting wars for the jews. ?

What fucking war have you personally ever fought?

Yes it'd be funny. Would you like to come up for air back in the real world now?

Are you even dimly aware of Israel's "Samson Option"? The one where they've not-so-vaguely suggested that they'll fire nukes in literally every single direction at everywhere, even their own allies, if they ever thought they were going to go down?

Prove Iran was actually two weeks from the bomb

I don't have to. The fact that Iran built a "peaceful" nuclear program under five different mountains and said they would rather die than give it up is evidence enough. That isn't the reaction a sane country has to some small-scale nuclear power projects being shut down.

And when a superpower tells you to jump, and you're a pissant nation like Iran, you ask 'how high'. They were given 60 days to figure this out before all their senior leadership was killed. They thought they were strong, they learned the hard way they're a sad, weak, worthless nation.

Either they're making a nuke, or they're insane, so either way it's justified killing them. As I said: The weak exist to serve the strong. Iran is weak. They should have either done things differently in their past to allow them to develop as a nation with allies and strength, or they should have licked boot like they were ordered to.

But Iran fucked that up. For nearly 50 years they alienated everybody on the global stage. They are now paying the price for being shit.

If Iran didn't want this, why did they scream 'Death to America' for 50 years? Don't you think, in hindsight, maybe not screaming like a lunatic for decades would've been a more sensible option? Don't you think maybe their situation would be more sympathetic if they weren't loudly making such asinine proclamations for most people's entire lives?

They chose this. "Talk shit, get hit". If millions of them have to die, that's what they chose when they decided to put a regime as consistently retarded as the Ayatollah in charge.

our own intelligence

Name one thing our intelligence has ever been correct about.

Why should America care if Tel Aviv was nuked, anyway?

Literally doesn't matter because that's the reality of the situation. The imaginary fantasyland you wish you lived in isn't real. Deal with reality.

Yeah, the IDF would finally get to show their stuff in a real war...oh...wait...you main America? Again, fucking why?

I know you struggle with geopolitics, but Iran doesn't share a land border with Israel, Israel has no ability to militarily project power, and therefore it would 'have' to be the US.

Yeah, so you're concerned about it being "expensive", but you endorse Iran nuking Tel Aviv, which would 100% put American boots on the ground in Iran for a decade.

The real question is are you childish, petty, and emotional enough to hate Tel Aviv enough to subject Americans to that, or maybe if you actually were "America First", the better course of option would be to not deal with that?

There's your answer. I have absolutely no love of Israel or jews but you're utterly out of your fucking mind if you think any other option has a more positive outcome.

My answer to your question about Tel Aviv literally requires you to answer my question first. Answer it and you'll get your answer.

any opposition you have has literally nothing to do with 'foreign wars' or a trillion dollars spent fighting in Iran, or another generation of strife?

What do you think puts American lives more in jeopardy, six bombs dropped on Iran, or the US's inevitable reaction to Iran nuking Tel Aviv?

That's how I know you're lying about "America First".

And that's exactly what I mean when I say that people like you have such tiny fucking minds you literally cannot think beyond the immediacy of your womanlike emotions. I understand you're having an emotional moment as you watch your shitty nation of disgusting fuckups die, but please try to control your hysteria in the future.

If Iran nuked Israel it is 100% certain there'd be a ground operation in Iran. You either haven't considered that, or you literally don't give a shit. So you're either a snake lying about 'America First', or you're actually just that stupid.

we're a bit fed up with all the Israeli cock we've been forced to gobble for the last three plus decades.

And you decided to throw your hat in with the Marxists and Muslims on the left? That's your plan?

Holy fuck it's no wonder people like you can never get anything done, you genuinely have absolutely zero capacity to think about anything more than the immediate emotional moment you find yourself in.

It's the same shit you hear from the whining fags over in ConPro: all they want to do is loudly whine and cry, but their plan to get anything done is retarded and imaginary and utterly self-defeating.

So just to be clear, any opposition you have has literally nothing to do with 'foreign wars' or a trillion dollars spent fighting in Iran, or another generation of strife?