I know it’s beating a dead horse but why are women never chastised for the 10/10 men with muscles that grace the cover of romance novels and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a male lead in a movie aimed at women who was ugly/overweight. I’ve heard men get attacked for not wanting to date a woman who was fat. Never seen it the other way around
The overriding strategy is to position female preferences as the new default while male preferences are demonized as aberrant and problematic. There’s no allowance for different tastes or markets. There’s only “good” media that strictly adheres to feminist leftist Marxist ideologies and “bad” media that appeals to wrongthinkers. We can’t have variety or choice because people will reliably choose “wrong”. Marxists can never abide competition because their products are garbage.
There's no such thing as "preferences", dating choices have a whole biological background. Women won't be forced to date fat ugly guys because they know even the most out of shape man is stronger than them.
Feminism at large is a contradiction, it's trying to solve a biological reality through the social contract.
Idk man, I've never seen a man wanting to marry and entitled hambeast and it not being a fetish.
I'm saying in a general sense, healthy individuals are more desirable. Agreeable women and assertive men too. All preferences are secondary to this.
What current_horror is refering to, is not only about women preferences but their whole outlook, since is based on evolutionary mechanisms. Women need to see themselves as the center of morality. Agressive men are demonized because agressive men make them uncomfortable, even thought manipulative dark triad men are more harmful to them
Not just their products, but everything about them. Their entire ideology is rooted in lies, jealousy and using force.
That’s why they don’t win anything organically, that’s why they always have to have armies of mods censoring people and police forces monitoring social media. That’s why they have to rig elections and mass import 3rd worlders to destabilize countries. That’s why they all have such a throbbing hard-on for CDBC, digital ID, and the thousand year commie empire it promises them.
They’re incapable of winning anything that isn’t rigged or stacked in their favor.
“The male gaze is back 😱”
Bitch, the male gaze never went anywhere, nor will it any time soon. It’s just that your bullshit propaganda is waning
Women have a vast, monstrous amount of social privilege that's either invisible to most men, or they're desperate to ignore it.
Alot of men - even the successful, married, established ones - really don't want to consider the implications of hypergamy, or that their precious wittle angels really aren't. It's why you see so many goddamn double-standards, from just casual social aspects all the way up to academic and business favoritism. That we've basically gotten to the point where women get to goon in public to what amounts to just-shy-of-beastility porn is... look, I don't want to say 'we can't go any lower than this', cause someone will prove me wrong, but I really hope we can't go any lower than this without something finally snapping and cource-correcting this mess.
same reason why.. if a leftist say a sexy girl in a video game makes them uncomfortable, the industry prioritize and pretty much give their uncomfortable-ness top priority. but if we say we are uncomfortable with trannies in a video game, they call us chuds and nazi
True. I remember back in like 2017 when I was still on reddit I was in a group for fantasy book readers and this lady was whining about female representation and how men wrote women. I told her to just read books written by women so she doesn’t have to whine so much. That was the first time I got hit with a ton of angry comments from guys coming to her rescue. I thought I was giving her a logical solution
"I said I was thirsty because I wanted you to empathize with my feelings of thirsteness, Billy. I didn't want you to solve the issue of me being thirsty. Do you understand Billy?"
Two seconds later
"Don't say screw, screwing is for carpenters. Say (demure voice) make love or (deep ghetto puerto rican) FUCK!!
Why? It’s all jewish propaganda. There’s no reason for you to need to read it. Don’t give them clicks. Don’t give them ad impressions. Don’t give them visit numbers to tell their shareholders.
I suppose it's up to each of us to decide if it's worth the time to read or at least glance at. My only point was that a screenshot is low effort and won't generate any real discussion since we only have a title to go off.
Most people who copy reddit are just taking it wholesale and struggle to do basic troubleshooting to keep it running. Making actual changes (likely buried under a decade of things that'll break if you touch one random aspect) would likely be more work than just starting from scratch.
Especially since most reddit-clones exist for political splinters, not people who are extremely technical minded.
Well part of that is because more than half the time its just a link with nothing else but a long, rambling summary (or their opinion on the piece) for the title. And on top of that the majority of those links go to random twitter accounts that might have the actual piece linked there, but not always.
Hi, coward. Too afraid of me to reply directly, huh?
Disprove a word I have said on a single topic.
You won’t do it, coward. You’re shitting your pants in fear of objective reality. All you care about is your “safe hatred” that’s “edgy.txt but still socially acceptable so I’ll never get into trouble ha ha.” You’re completely worthless to this community.
Its one of those phrases the modern world had to adopt to stop SJW explosions back when those were at their peak. If you just say attractive or hot, you'll get 900000 comments about "she isn't that hot" from simps and catty women and it'll just drown out everything else.
Its an annoying reminder of how prevalent they are and how much we had to sacrifice to appease their autistic shitfits.
It's specifically intellectually designed to take the concept of attractiveness and pin it to a singular time period, suggesting that it's not something inherently biological. Thanks, College-Educated Women.
The male gaze has always been around — art in the eye of the male beholder — but the term came into modern existence as a feminist theory coined by film critic Laura Mulvey in 1975.
But film and television has historically been dominated by male writers and directors
It was historically profitable and the envy of the rest of the world too. Now it is a rapidly sinking ship, but at least they pretend women are "complex multidimensional human beings" I suppose.
The article is about fats no longer being used to advertise women's clothing. The author is particularly mad about Sydney Sweeney. She also insinuates that girlbosses are no longer in movies and TV shows, even though there are still fresh flops around.
I know it’s beating a dead horse but why are women never chastised for the 10/10 men with muscles that grace the cover of romance novels and I don’t think I’ve ever seen a male lead in a movie aimed at women who was ugly/overweight. I’ve heard men get attacked for not wanting to date a woman who was fat. Never seen it the other way around
The overriding strategy is to position female preferences as the new default while male preferences are demonized as aberrant and problematic. There’s no allowance for different tastes or markets. There’s only “good” media that strictly adheres to feminist leftist Marxist ideologies and “bad” media that appeals to wrongthinkers. We can’t have variety or choice because people will reliably choose “wrong”. Marxists can never abide competition because their products are garbage.
There's no such thing as "preferences", dating choices have a whole biological background. Women won't be forced to date fat ugly guys because they know even the most out of shape man is stronger than them.
Feminism at large is a contradiction, it's trying to solve a biological reality through the social contract.
You're fucking retarded. just because something is biological doesn't mean it's also not a preference.
Generations of healthy society would prove you wrong. Women finding 99.3% of the men they see as below them is a modern trend.
Idk man, I've never seen a man wanting to marry and entitled hambeast and it not being a fetish.
I'm saying in a general sense, healthy individuals are more desirable. Agreeable women and assertive men too. All preferences are secondary to this.
What current_horror is refering to, is not only about women preferences but their whole outlook, since is based on evolutionary mechanisms. Women need to see themselves as the center of morality. Agressive men are demonized because agressive men make them uncomfortable, even thought manipulative dark triad men are more harmful to them
Plenty who are desperate enough to settle though. Women currently lack that desperation.
Caveman style - whack 'em with a stick, drag then back to your cave, with fire, and whack them with your dick
Not just their products, but everything about them. Their entire ideology is rooted in lies, jealousy and using force.
That’s why they don’t win anything organically, that’s why they always have to have armies of mods censoring people and police forces monitoring social media. That’s why they have to rig elections and mass import 3rd worlders to destabilize countries. That’s why they all have such a throbbing hard-on for CDBC, digital ID, and the thousand year commie empire it promises them.
They’re incapable of winning anything that isn’t rigged or stacked in their favor.
“The male gaze is back 😱”
Bitch, the male gaze never went anywhere, nor will it any time soon. It’s just that your bullshit propaganda is waning
Women have a vast, monstrous amount of social privilege that's either invisible to most men, or they're desperate to ignore it.
Alot of men - even the successful, married, established ones - really don't want to consider the implications of hypergamy, or that their precious wittle angels really aren't. It's why you see so many goddamn double-standards, from just casual social aspects all the way up to academic and business favoritism. That we've basically gotten to the point where women get to goon in public to what amounts to just-shy-of-beastility porn is... look, I don't want to say 'we can't go any lower than this', cause someone will prove me wrong, but I really hope we can't go any lower than this without something finally snapping and cource-correcting this mess.
I'm regularly attacked even here for pointing out the reality of the modern dating market.
Another sex bot just got ordered
same reason why.. if a leftist say a sexy girl in a video game makes them uncomfortable, the industry prioritize and pretty much give their uncomfortable-ness top priority. but if we say we are uncomfortable with trannies in a video game, they call us chuds and nazi
You could file Adam Driver under ugly but overweight will never happen.
Adam Driver was a marine, he's 6'2, and he makes six figures.
You do the math on that one.
He also had a 6 pack at a time and the photos are online.
Good point.
True. I remember back in like 2017 when I was still on reddit I was in a group for fantasy book readers and this lady was whining about female representation and how men wrote women. I told her to just read books written by women so she doesn’t have to whine so much. That was the first time I got hit with a ton of angry comments from guys coming to her rescue. I thought I was giving her a logical solution
You were giving her a logical solution. She didn't want a logical solution, she wanted reality to warp to her preferences.
"I said I was thirsty because I wanted you to empathize with my feelings of thirsteness, Billy. I didn't want you to solve the issue of me being thirsty. Do you understand Billy?"
Two seconds later
"Don't say screw, screwing is for carpenters. Say (demure voice) make love or (deep ghetto puerto rican) FUCK!!
"Why do you even care? Only an incel would care about feminist hypocrisy."
We could have benefited from an archive of the actual article rather than a screenshot of the title.
Why? It’s all jewish propaganda. There’s no reason for you to need to read it. Don’t give them clicks. Don’t give them ad impressions. Don’t give them visit numbers to tell their shareholders.
Don’t let evil enter your brain, either.
I suppose it's up to each of us to decide if it's worth the time to read or at least glance at. My only point was that a screenshot is low effort and won't generate any real discussion since we only have a title to go off.
Honestly, it has been nearly 20 years. Why do ZERO Reddit-like sites allow for a submissions with links, text, AND images yet?
Most people who copy reddit are just taking it wholesale and struggle to do basic troubleshooting to keep it running. Making actual changes (likely buried under a decade of things that'll break if you touch one random aspect) would likely be more work than just starting from scratch.
Especially since most reddit-clones exist for political splinters, not people who are extremely technical minded.
You're not wrong, but I'd like for us to do better than that collectively.
Well part of that is because more than half the time its just a link with nothing else but a long, rambling summary (or their opinion on the piece) for the title. And on top of that the majority of those links go to random twitter accounts that might have the actual piece linked there, but not always.
Feminist retards have been spreading the same garbage for decades. I rather doubt there's anything new in the article to discuss.
Hi, coward. Too afraid of me to reply directly, huh?
Disprove a word I have said on a single topic.
You won’t do it, coward. You’re shitting your pants in fear of objective reality. All you care about is your “safe hatred” that’s “edgy.txt but still socially acceptable so I’ll never get into trouble ha ha.” You’re completely worthless to this community.
This is Biblical truth right here.
Try again with something believable or fuck off to another website where your brainwashing will be believed.
See what, you humiliating yourself? Disprove a single thing I’ve said on a single topic. It shouldn’t be that hard if I’m actually wrong, right?
I’m not seeing any refutation. Do you know what “disprove” means? Are you physically capable of reading the English language? Clearly not.
My position is “No one will ever do anything about this.”
You claim your position is “Someone will eventually do something about this some day eventually somehow eventually someday.”
I have a century of evidence to defend my claim. You don’t even have the pretense of an argument.
You're right: https://archive.is/nRudj
Anyone else hate the term "conventionally attractive?"
Just say HOT.
Its one of those phrases the modern world had to adopt to stop SJW explosions back when those were at their peak. If you just say attractive or hot, you'll get 900000 comments about "she isn't that hot" from simps and catty women and it'll just drown out everything else.
Its an annoying reminder of how prevalent they are and how much we had to sacrifice to appease their autistic shitfits.
It's specifically intellectually designed to take the concept of attractiveness and pin it to a singular time period, suggesting that it's not something inherently biological. Thanks, College-Educated Women.
Wrong, it was coined back in 1972, by you wouldn't believe it, an art critic named John Berger
The coy mousy librarian, the fierce femme fatale and the relatable girl-next-door have always been around.
They just didn't need to hog the limelight like it was a pit worth looking into.
These pigs in shit have wallowed for well over a decade now and still can't catch the eye of a potential suitor.
You'd think they'd reflect on why that is, but that would require thinking.
Pigs will never get what that means.
I think they get it more than most.
has never went away, they just censored it, thinking it would be its nail in the coffin.
It was historically profitable and the envy of the rest of the world too. Now it is a rapidly sinking ship, but at least they pretend women are "complex multidimensional human beings" I suppose.
I doubt this headline after looking at the average woman being obese and skanky
The article is about fats no longer being used to advertise women's clothing. The author is particularly mad about Sydney Sweeney. She also insinuates that girlbosses are no longer in movies and TV shows, even though there are still fresh flops around.
Female narcissism gets the clicks.
MUH MAIL GAYS
Similar to depriving women of basic domestic skills, any girl who cooks is immediately like 2 points higher. They only made beauty more valuable.
We never left bitch nice tits