True, I may just have to try out some more headsets, or other distros. I hope it's not my soundcard, because I can't swap that out as easily.
The biggest obstacle for me with Linux is actually the audio issues. For some reason it doesn't always pick up input from my mics, and I could never figure out why.
I mean I don't know who Lethn was referring to specifically, but honestly this reply seems kind of like it confirms what he said.
Also, fed
Yep, he's also admitted to creating this account for ban evasion. I'm assuming his previous account was "IHateSluts", which was banned a month ago. This account was created almost immediately after that one was banned.
That's interesting, I actually had to look that one up. I don't remember ever seeing the word Holocaust in the Bible, but I only ever read the King James version. But you're right, they do use it in the Catholic translations, specifically when instructing Abraham to offer his son Isaac as a sacrifice. The King James version replaces that term with "burnt offering".
That actually reminds me of why I think I liked Robin Williams's character in that movie. Seeing the android awkwardly try to act like a human reminds me a lot of a human who hasn't quite adapted themselves to their surrounding culture. His social ineptitude turns people off, but the fact that he's so sincere and innocent helps make up for it.
On a related note, I've never really liked the tendency for people to immediately associate the label of autism with being nerdy and socially awkward. To my knowledge, autism is not something that can be objectively measured or tested for – a doctor can't run a blood test and say, "yep, you've got the autism".
I didn't even realize that the movie was poorly received. I remember watching it because someone at my church recommended it, and I really enjoyed it. It's been a while since I've seen it, but I thought it was better than most other sci-fi movies I've seen.
What parts did you think were uncomfortable?
Anything above zero is statistically impossible because lesbians aren't real.
I already explained how he's not a victim here:
It looks like some of his victims were both white and male. The shooter also made a recording where he said, "I'm going to open fire on everyone in that hallway...I will try to hit as many people as I can.". So, that means he wasn't even targeting anyone specific. He just wanted to kill random people indiscriminately, without any thought of whether they deserved it or not.
Why did you refuse to answer my last question?
Victim card won't work here. That's sjw logic. Would you refuse to denounce a White male who molests children?
Your original comment that started this conversation off was:
Bullshit, what about everyone who drove the kid to that point?
I asked why we should feel sorry for him. Then you said:
Because he's white and was driving to such actions. If you've stepped outside in the past couple decades it's easy to see the reasons why he was suffering in such a way.
But then I asked for evidence, and you failed to provide any evidence that he was a victim or that he was enacting any sort of "justified" revenge. You confirmed you were being disingenuous here:
There will always be casualties and his actual intent doesn't even matter, narrative is all that matters and his actions are something we can use to spin such a narrative.
I pointed out that even from a "narrative" perspective, this doesn't help our cause. Then you endorsed his actions by saying:
if enough white men embraced him there would be fear about stepping on our toes once more
Now you're backtracking and claiming that, in spite of endorsing the shooter's actions and saying that we should be following his lead, that you're actually not promoting his actions (totally!) and you just wanted us to feel sorry for him (but we still don't have any reason to feel sorry for him).
If you really believed what you're saying, you'd already be out there shooting things up yourself. Instead, you choose to hang out here and try to convince other people to commit terrorism and blackpill them into thinking there are no other viable options. You couldn't glow any brighter.
Just to make sure that I'm understanding everyone's position here, apparently we support murdering random people because "no bad tactics, only bad targets"?
Even if we set aside any sense of morality and adopt a purely pragmatic approach, I don't see how this aids our cause at all. This story is only going to be used to restrict 2A rights and demonize White males further.
If you're some extremely angsty, misanthropic person, then I can understand the appeal of fantasizing about committing shootings. But if you choose to act on that impulse, then you're not doing anything to help other White Nats out there. If you really wanted to make a difference, there are much more efficient (and more moral) ways of doing that.
What evidence do you have that that was his motive? It looks like some of his victims were both white and male. The shooter also made a recording where he said, "I'm going to open fire on everyone in that hallway...I will try to hit as many people as I can.". So, that means he wasn't even targeting anyone specific. He just wanted to kill random people indiscriminately, without any thought of whether they deserved it or not.
And you're saying we should support this guy?....Jesus. You either have to be a fedposter or a schizo.
I don't know anything about this kid. Why should we feel sympathy for him?
I hate that the world works likes this.
Let the TERFs and trannies fight each other. If we're lucky maybe some leftists will get confused about who to support and end up hating both.
Does this guy actually make a living doing this? Just traveling around and harassing locals for internet points?
I just watched the video, so I guess I'll give my summary:
Video narrator says that the war against DEI isn't over, and SBI was just the beginning. He talks about the VTuber Kirsche who's been spreading awareness about BRIDGE. BRIDGE was mentioned in a post on this site earlier today, and it's pretty much an acronym that represents an ideology of expanding DEI into everything. The information about BRIDGE comes from the website socialimpact DOT com, which claims to be a global consulting firm. social impact is relatively unknown, but their website lists clients like the U.S. Department of State and Mastercard. The BRIDGE Executive Committee also includes influential members from major companies, like Campbell's. The final message of the video is that we need to spread awareness of BRIDGE and social impact so we can stop these people from taking over everything.
I think the implication he's making is that a benevolent dictatorship would be more effective than a corrupt democracy – which is probably true, but only if you're making the assumption that the dictatorship will continue to support your interests in the future.
What do they even gain from doing that? Wouldn't that just give Texas more house seats? Of course I'm sure there are other motives, but you would think they'd want to cram them into blue states instead.
Remember Jussie Smollett? I'm still amazed by how fast everyone forgot about that.
Of all the things for a jew to try to make fun of others for: inbreeding? Medical Genetics of Jews
When Helldivers 2 was released it wasn't required that you connect a PSN account to it. So a lot of people bought it through Steam, and then Sony decided later on to make PSN a requirement. PSN isn't available in a lot of countries, so people who had already put time into the game in those countries are now unable to play. Steam is offering refunds for the game because of this, but people are still pretty upset and have bombed the game with bad reviews.