33
You_Are_Based 33 points ago +33 / -0

They struggle to wrap their heads around what is happening. Hardcore conservatives lol.

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +7 / -3

He replied to my comment about the psychology of apathy/inaction, not a comment that said "if you dont burn yourself you are bad".

Idk if you guys are even being genuine here, the comment I wrote is right there above our replies.

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +6 / -4

It's telling that you set up a false dichotomy between inaction and actual, literal self immolation.

5
You_Are_Based 5 points ago +10 / -5

Imagine jews are vulnerable and you just pozz up and ignore it like a good little goy.

Jews killing goyim openly wholesale and everyone including censors and libs are open to unabashed antisemitism for the first time in ages? Ill just nap. Yawwwn, ah yeah, everyone but me sure is stupid.

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

It makes a literal, actual difference. Don't fret about it being small or anything else that lets them take that difference away from you via morale, after you have done what's right by abstaining

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +4 / -0

We are in sync here. Yknow, rumor has it that a certain person once devised a plan to send these types of people off to the island nation of Madagascar instead of a place they could easily migrate back from. I like that style and I think it would be worth it to maintain clear airspace and prevent inland traffic by sea using military resources that are typically allocated to the interests of a certain parasite nation.

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +4 / -0

I see every current civil servant and politician living in exile

I was the single most comfiest man in the world for a moment as I read this sentence fragment. This is why you can't let your imagination fizzle out as you get older.

6
You_Are_Based 6 points ago +6 / -0

Reposting an old but relevant post I wrote;

Le Morte D'Arthur (compiled from common stories by professional insurrectionist and criminal superstar Thomas Malory from a dusty prison cell) is one of my favorite books. I do not recall it once even acknowledging the existence of non-White persons.

It treated men from anywhere outside of the Arthursphere as simultaneously alien and European. The narrative treated knights as being in strange and exotic situations any time they spoke to another White man from even a very slightly non-English or French setting. Rather than tell English lore about Africans who are not English, the narrative prefers to create a new, totally fictional kingdom of White europeans whose foremost traits are how strange and exotic they as White men are to the other Also White men.

The word "black" in the book is synonymous with "bad", "dark", or "evil" and is only used in this way except perhaps to describe the physical color of an object. The word fair is used often, and for its every meaning; "light" and "dainty" as well as "equal" and "just", and also is used directly to describe the skin of many women, in order to suggest to the reader that the woman is desirable.

After reading 300 pages of Mallory, if you came across the phrase "black man" (which you won't) you would assume it was a person with white skin who was involved in very bad things and possibly evil magic, i.e. a moral foil to actual Merlin who exists in the Euro cultural miasma.

9
You_Are_Based 9 points ago +9 / -0

The govt and public schools purposefully did a "banned" book thing to muddy the waters so that when you look online for banned books you mainly find lists of "banned" books, meaning books that the eeeeeeevil White man removed from local grade school readjng lists sometimes in single-county instances. All the books globohomo itself phases out are not "banned", they are actually banned.

4
You_Are_Based 4 points ago +4 / -0

Btw these peopl's data showed a general +20% willingness to ban/censor when any of the negative speech was directed toward gays as opposed to other groups. It was even the majority in 1 case, topping 50% favoring moderation.

6
You_Are_Based 6 points ago +6 / -0

across all studies large majorities do not support any kind of moderation—not even for the threatening condition—with banning a person’s account being the least preferred option across the board (again, excluding the LGBTQ case). This finding has important implications because Democrats, who are almost twice as likely to demand moderation than Republicans (Morning Consult 2023; see also our findings below), are overrepresented and thus a more balanced sample by partisanship would probably show narrower support for content moderation. Importantly, we analyzed the effect of age on moderation preferences to examine if the variation in our outcome variable is due to our relatively younger participant pool. We do not observe large differences between younger and older age groups (see Figure S1 in the SM) when demanding moderation, while older subjects seem to be fairly frequent users of social media (around 85% said they used social media recently) (see Figure S2 in the SM). We think these results give additional credence to this study’s conclusions about how users’ attitudes toward content moderation matter for anticipating if a critical mass to make platforms more responsive to the content they host could ever materialize.

6
You_Are_Based 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you're a troll then there is nothing to say to you. If you are actually this stupid, then there is still nothing to say to you. Like congrats for pretending to be a retard online, hope it provides all the amusement you were looking for.

8
You_Are_Based 8 points ago +8 / -0

Couldnt you just identify as the correct gender (the one you always been) and solve it without tearing down various aspects of society and legalizing child predation and such?

-1
You_Are_Based -1 points ago +1 / -2

Eyyy. Just think about what you do. Like stalking users and documenting their post histories and such. Reddit thing, check. Every little part of what you do, but worse, because they are gay communist psychopaths and not regular psychopaths.

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

just tell them they're retarded, and then not engage again.

You're retarded, and then not engage again.

5
You_Are_Based 5 points ago +6 / -1

If I were born yesterday, I would already be interested in holocaust denial as a result of reading the first few posts of the top comment chain. They scramble over one another for clout and to remove clout from others in a way that is simultaneously cult-like and piranna-like.

I mainly browse conpro and I say things that are violations of hard right narrative and personality all the time. It results in fuckall consequence because it is not a cult and those people are not pirannas. Only ever knew one user who was frankly mentally ill and did the reddit thing (josephgoebbels5). Reddit reads like an entire collective of such psychopaths except they are all pussies and communist sycophants to boot, which does quite effectively make them worse.

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ignore the order, call an emergency, guard the border, arrest anyone who interferes, arrest anyone who tries to arrest you for arresting someone, cope with the escalation and incidentally save the future of all European races.

2
You_Are_Based 2 points ago +2 / -0

needed a female judge

Unless the court is trying to have a baby this is a literal nonsense sentence fragment

11
You_Are_Based 11 points ago +11 / -0

Is he talking to French people, or....?

Because then you could simply free up houses and strengthen wages by, idk, increasing competition involved in finding new workers and homeowners... ie.... protect your border and ship out invaders

But he's not talking to French people, really.

1
You_Are_Based 1 point ago +1 / -0

Idk whether I am remembering certain singleplayer bits or if there are bots but I am in the same spot there-hazy memory

view more: Next ›