Nobody else has said it so I feel I have to. He made several criticisms of israel, like concessions to the internet, and forumed speakers who were critical of israel, inviting them to events, literally RIGHT before his death. Basically, he broke profile in the last 6 months to defy before your hitherto-accurate description of his gatekeeping up to that point.
But, to be fair, that's regarding israel in particular, and not descriptive of an outright turnaround against con inc.
The real losers in this are guys with small penises lol. Body positivity for me, not for thee. This is coming from the guys who started the soulless gingers thing out of nowhere for seemingly no reason, so I am not exactly used to holding the show to any moral account, though. I will say, I think it was better back then when the question of morality comes from a place of silly asspull rather than a toddler's idea of political satire.
Most informative follow-up would be a volume per buyer/seller chart covering the same span
Cant have supply and demand drive prices for anything down. No, only up. Prices going down? Tut tut, White people, you should have paid x company/institution more money, now we will need to import a nonwhite population in order to keep you priced out and driven into debt. Darn!
As if men don't already pay more in taxes lmao
Daily reminder that the person who runs this account is female and jewish, but more to the point:
libs are the real racists!!
That's great, that's literally fantastic news, maybe we can all be racist together, then. Go fuck yourself, chaya raichik. Your name sounds like I swore badly in turkish.
That's not the win she thinks it is. Reminds me of "the anti-war position is antisemitic". Like, alright. Lol.
Here Lies Anon, Husband, Father, Grandfather, Who hated the jews, the arabs, the nigs, the jeets, the spics, and women, except for his beloved wife Marilyn and two of his three beautiful grand-daughters.
Okay, the degree by which I am failing think of a suitable, serious answer, is bothersome. What the fuck did they even mean? Did they do it on purpose? I mean, we're talking about it.
I tip 20% unless their shit is all retarded, because I view it as the price of playing nice. It's compulsive. I like the average server and appreciate their attention more than I hate my job. I don't eat out much, to be fair, but it's often a situation where I'm paying for the dinner only, with someone else happily fielding a decent tip, or the reverse, when I am putting up the tip after someone else has paid for a meal. That sort of back and forth is good for brotherly social muju. You can be disproportionately rewarded forever by some blokes in a dive bar for what amounts to chump money. What do you do with small money anyway? Need to fix you car? Sort it out and then literally just spend that level of cash on your interactions with people. Inject it. 90% of it is food. Humans are obsessed with food. Hack the brains of everyone you know with this one simple trick. Tipping is basically a systemic abuse of the wisdom of generosity, so pick a rate you can feel good about in front of people and don't let it get out of hand, but I say: don't let such an amount of money affect your life undesirably when you choose to participate in social events.
Stones in glass houses. Its not just a lefty thing. Many men on the internet who judge the appearance of actresses and models would stop using their accounts if someone shot back with an actual photograph of them. Our situation is a little different, because the dissent and quasi anonymity amount it to doxxing, whereas this dumb woman is public, but still; stones in glass houses.
Hate for resellers peeves me off. People think stuff just magically floats out of people's basements and into their amazon packages for free and that any living any of their countrymen makes doing that work is illegitimate because, and I am only briefly summarizing the argument here: "wah, wah, goo goo ga ga" Sorry that human time is worth money lmao
Why even hold predators in captivity? Purely profit motive. Zoos should be more limited in my opinion. For instance, is it not cold where you live? No fucking penguins at your zoo, then, you psychopaths.
Man I'm feeling sorry for being such a dick to you in the past. As far as the argument, I read that argumentation as "i refuse to use google, because I know I would find the source, and that it would support my opponent's argument, and I lack the motive to do that". Refusal of footrubs isnt lack of source. Usually you can answer source by naming it. When it is named, it is provided as a source. No one is obligated to purchase/print/mail a book in order to discuss a book with other online.
Take for instance academia, where a source notation is simply a line of text which DIRECTS the reader to a source. Never was there any expectation that a paper would be delivered to the reader with the actual physical sources. This is the standard for professionals, but it is the same even in casual debate. For instance, there has never been an expectation that in order to claim something about LOTR that I must supply you with LOTR. Your awareness and accessibility to the material are sufficient.
For the record, I think I know that you know I'm right. That I don't really believe your heartfelt investment in your argument is a compliment, though. Only weak people fold entirely, it is in the nature of a good or decent or unbroken man to resist.
Well, it's nice to see which part of your tude are mechanical and which are contextual. I was wondering if the narrative implications you have accepted lately came with any sort of revelations about past behavior, as I remember feeling quite humiliated when I realized my place in some arguments I had taken part in in the past. I once tried to argue that magazine restrictions would reduce shootings because there were "less bullets available on the field" during an incident and when the guy followed up with me years later I was at a total loss and had to apologize for my ignorance and the hilarity of my mental gymnastics, and beg him to chalk it up to age.
I very much dont care about being downvoted. You of all people must understand. Maybe one of us has profile stalkers. It shouldn't be me, though. I post like 2x, 4x a week. It was a dick reply that deserved to be downvoted anyway.
In the context of our old argument, I satisfied the burden of proof by informing you of the source- period. I am not logically responsible for downloading/purchasing & delivering you with materials to work around your own choices, even if it is a deliberately obstinent choice, like refusing to view or confirm a proof that was already provided
"I never received the book in the mail, so I won't acknowledge it as a source".
"I simply ignored it and therefore you cannot reference it"
This stuff works on some people because it takes 500 words to disassemble a good fallacy or con. This is part of why legal systems become so bloated- it takes a lot of care to handle bullshit in a proper way. The system is obligated to untangle the tangle and so it becomes an easy way to x10 the money and time spend on an argument. Lots of cases are settled in favor of the bullshit due to the expense and the tangle-time expansion effect is often applied deliberately to that end. What you did is what I would call "source-fagging" online because I am an internet creature, but in the context of work it is more often about the legal responsibility of response to an official notice which the person claims to have been blissfully ignorant of, or refuses the legitimacy of.
Just looking through old comments and reminiscing about this time you were so intent on defending a outspokenly subversive jewish pornographer that you pretended to be incapable of googling a book, with the idea that doing so would allow you to frame a small wikipedia article as the source of a book's content (which is the source for the article's content), all so that you could attack wikipedia in defense of the pornographer instead of having to tango with the pornographer's own words about his motives for selling porn.
Are you at the point of admitting that this was comical of you? I have seen you coming around on things and I am curious.
I dont suggest an 8 track collection. If you do, be extremely cautious and personally examine each cassette for degradation, especially the foam pieces under the tape itself, and never order vintage 8 track lots online unless you are okay with a ridiculous trash-to-signal rate.
Also, 8 tracks themselves suck in terms of quality. I know a guy who said about them: "I only listen to the vocals, anyway". Sounds get smooshed. If you enjoy the little flourishes and subtle graces of attention that the musicians provide in your music, I say avoid 8 tracks!
This country's institutions and authorities are a total joke. How long can it last?
Doesnt account for the natural expansion of the population that was not deported
So what I saw was:
-one user suggests that the golden age of Spanish culture happened during a period of persecution of jews
-second user confirms that the Spanish golden age is associated with the political success of Catholic Monarchs
In order to effectively refute user one's argument, user two would have to successfully suggest: -jews werent kicked out of Spain during the period, or: -Spain did not experience a golden age, or: -Spain experienced a golden age due to another reason
Dont accuse other people of being jews. This is a you-specific suggestion. It ironically is very jewish of you because are only offering that criticism in the context of your own defense of israel.
Could you rephrase that as an argument?
KIA2ers, What happened is that Trump attacked the israeli cohort's war narrative (nuclear weapon production). You will see people expressing conspiracy theories discrediting the attack, while the cohort switches gears to a different narrative for justifying American boots on ground.
–ketobikerdude 1 hour ago +6 / -1 So the only the way to be sure is boots 🥾 on the ground
This man fucks
It happens literally every day. You have to think in rates. Conversion rates, birth rates, rates of acceleration or decay. So x normies are born annually and y normies wakeup. If x/y is a giant giant number then you are befucked, but wait; there's more, as x has w (normie spawnrate rate of increase) and y has z (normie awakenrate rate of increase) both in period u, which I would express austically as