Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

39
100 flat rate for shipping for a bunch for trinkets. Thanks China for advertising scalping and second hand resellers even more now. (media.scored.co)
posted 323 days ago by LeRiverDanube 323 days ago by LeRiverDanube +39 / -0
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 19 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 19 points 323 days ago +19 / -0

I read it three times, I can't even figure out what it's saying.

Must be because I'm not smart enough to watch Rick and Morty.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– LeRiverDanube [S] 15 points 323 days ago +15 / -0

anything below 185 gets slapped with an additional 100. not covering the shipping cost too. All because muh tarrifs.

unsurprisingly reddit blames burganistan because their cheap anime shit is affected.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– SR388-SAX 14 points 323 days ago +14 / -0

So.... if someone orders a $0.50 piece of plastic that costs $25 from an online Chinese dealer, they'll get hit with a $100 flat rate tariff fee as well?

I'm not seeing the downside here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Modern_Times 10 points 322 days ago +10 / -0

Amazon put most of their domestic sellers distributing imports out of business when they opened their market for direct shipping to their customers from China. Not only did US sellers have to pay to import the goods through customs but they were subject to inspections and testing to make sure they were safe. China got Epackets delivered by the PO for around 80 cents on light psckahes while US sellers had to pay regular postage costing from $4 to $6 to delever as close as down the block. E packets from Chins had no import duties or inspectinns in most cases on packages valued under $800.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– captain-shitpost 7 points 322 days ago +7 / -0

it's even worse than this. look up the brokerage scandal. they use a huge series of brokerages to claim multiple shipping containers of stuff was a bunch of small shipments under the limit. the bills of lading presented to customs would show the separate brokerages addresses, but the brokerages would just have forwarding in place all to amazon warehouses. so the containers/pallets would get unloaded, and shipped straight to amazon. it's why the de minimis exemption was eliminated entirely... because they were abusing the shit out of it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LeRiverDanube [S] 2 points 323 days ago +2 / -0

le happy scalper moment

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 323 days ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ParadigmShift2070 2 points 322 days ago +2 / -0

Haha letting the customers eat 100% of tariffs is entirely America's fault, God forbids if the seller takes even a small hit to their own profit on Chinese shits that cost pennies to produce

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ernsithe 6 points 323 days ago +6 / -0

There's literally a table right there.

  • Under $185? $100 flat rate payable by player
  • Equal to or more than $185? 54% of value, pay able by player

The attempt at English text under it is ignorable, unless you're interested in the part where the 54% used to be 120%. Or if you want to look at it a different way, the tariff is essentially max(100, value*0.54).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 5 points 323 days ago +5 / -0

So... 54% with a minimum of $100. People sure love to over-complicate things.

The ordering is a bit weird (I'd put the middle one on the left), and I may be a bit clueless.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ernsithe 3 points 323 days ago +3 / -0

Agreed. Good formatting would put the variable of the value on the left and maybe apply some sort of header formatting or at least bold.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Gizortnik 8 points 322 days ago +8 / -0

This is the pain that forces companies to divest out of china and into better countries that we can have leverage over. It was working in 2019, and it's going to work now. Even if they don't move back to the US, some of them are going to move to Japan, Thailand, Taiwan, Vietnam, and South Korea.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Impishdesire 5 points 322 days ago +5 / -0

oh no trump is decentivizing people from buying cheap crap mad in hellish Chinese sweat shops with suicide nets outside! What has capitalism done!?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RoulerBleu 2 points 321 days ago +2 / -0

''Stop Plastic! Save the Earth!''

''NO DON'T PUT A TARIF ON MY PLASTIC WASTE!''

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– RoulerBleu 3 points 321 days ago +3 / -0

Leftists constantly agitate for taxing wasteful luxuries to ''save the planet'' and fund public services

Well tarifs on stuff like plastic figurines and games consoles is peak taxing the soon-to-be e-waste luxuries.

I'd rather we stop wasting on money on greewashing, middle-eastern wars for the schlomos, and invaders.

Use some of that to build back factories ( and electronics production ) in North America.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GravenImage 3 points 322 days ago +3 / -0

Yeah I saw that post too. The fact they were crying about muh tariffs and shit without understanding that foreign crap getting more expensive is literally the entire point of the tariffs and that it was totally unintentional and something unintended by Trump was pretty funny.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– scruffyshoulders 2 points 322 days ago +2 / -0

Lol, so the trinkets themed around gacha slop now have duties automatically applied. I mean, the whales should be loving this, right, only they will be able to afford the trinkets, allowing them to show off their money wasting to their buddies. Sounds like a win win to me.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– You_Are_Based 2 points 322 days ago +2 / -0

Hate for resellers peeves me off. People think stuff just magically floats out of people's basements and into their amazon packages for free and that any living any of their countrymen makes doing that work is illegitimate because, and I am only briefly summarizing the argument here: "wah, wah, goo goo ga ga" Sorry that human time is worth money lmao

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BandageBandolier 1 point 321 days ago +1 / -0

Of course they're helping the scalpers and fraudulent "domestic" reshippers. They run half of them.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy