6
RondoOBlongo 6 points ago +6 / -0

SK is globohomo's endgame. A nation broken, divided and alienated from it's own traditions, yet begging for more globohomo

6
RondoOBlongo 6 points ago +6 / -0

We also got DDOSed around elections, iirc

The problem with Imp1 wasn't that he was abrasive, but that he was oddly selective about what he was abrasive about. I've seen abrasive manosphere members, that's why Imp1 seemed sus to me

5
RondoOBlongo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol. I've been around since KiA1. Different usernames tho.

I say it, because since those days there have been concern trolls about GG becoming too right wing (lol), incel, transphobic, etc.

I don't buy it tho, the pedopajeet was also a single person, still forum sliding

11
RondoOBlongo 11 points ago +12 / -1

the left as a whole

You didn't answer the question tho. By your logic, what Imp1 was doing in this community was forum sliding. Did you call him out?

15
RondoOBlongo 15 points ago +15 / -0

I mean, Kia2 became a thing because kia1 mods didn't want the comunity to stray away from "nerd culture".

Btw, do you get as mad when people here call out troons, feminists, immigrants, commies and globalists or you don't consider those forum sliding?

1
RondoOBlongo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there any way I could conterargue without you simply dismissing me as a simp? Funny how you can't even say who is my "queen", I even provided a male vtuber example, almost as if I'm arguing out of principles, but hey, at least beats being called a nahtze, am I right?

calling you a simpish weeb consuming an opiate.

Yes, I do have issue with people dismissing other people as consuming "opiate of the masses". Historically has been used by pseudo intellectual assholes who think they know better than anyone

And no, I don't think they should

There. That's all what I wanted to know. We will never reach a constructive discussion because you already made your conclusions. You consider (female) streamers cancer, I dont, simple as that. Good night, sir

2
RondoOBlongo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's be real, nobody with an economy major is sympathetic towards socialist/communist

1
RondoOBlongo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was referring to the literal thing you quoted which was completely neutral in tone.

Are you autistic or just being disingenuous? Do you know how paragraphs work? I quoted that because it builds on your first statement that has a confrontational tone

which lowers the bar of success in their minds

What are you even trying to argue here? Also, you refused to answer a simple question, so here it is again: Do you think wahmen should ever be able to earn a living by streaming?

There are more problems in life than just the Woke axis.

And there's the tradcon response, you know which site you are posting this to, right?

1
RondoOBlongo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its the new opiate for the simpish weeb masses.

How is this a neutral statement? This is the equivalent to tradcons saying videogames are for manchildren when someone complains about how shitty the game industry is, and that's your fault for not picking carpentry as a hobby

in terms of appearance

I don't see how this is a bad thing. I see it more as vtubers actually having to be entertaining as oposed to Amouranth or Pokimane flashing their tits. Also, that's why lots of pngtubers fail to gain any traction.

Big corpos

I mean, this is about Cover. Just the fact that there is a place that isn't flooded by idpolitics is a plus. Losing it in one way or another is worrysome because it's proof you either have to bend the knee to globohomo or go to Tencen level of corporate greed

2
RondoOBlongo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think the idol part is the problem. Neither Aqua nor Fauna complained about the idol aspect. Most likely it's due to some sort of reestructuration and the investors wanting to make more short term money at the talent's expense...

6
RondoOBlongo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its streaming without even having to have tits or even getting dresses

Only someone like you could spin that as a negative. Lol

Do you think wahmen should ever be able to earn a living by streaming?

Edit Also this. Don't offer your opinion if it's something you clearly don't know anything about

10
RondoOBlongo 10 points ago +10 / -0

Reminder: if this were about any other religion the movie would be considered hate speech

6
RondoOBlongo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I mean, if you want to get technical, judaism is a revamped version of the ancient Canaanite's religion. Also, it wasn't the first one, Zoroastrianism was

Well it's because they don't advertise their religion like Christians do.

They love advertising when they are atheists tho 🤔

3
RondoOBlongo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Disney princesses are cooler than the pale ones

Lol. Not even Disney believes that. They know Frozen is their big bucks franchise

2
RondoOBlongo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Walmart wagecucks are miserable as it is, don't force blm and pronoun shit onto them

27
RondoOBlongo 27 points ago +27 / -0

Even then, "more violent" is a misnomer. Men are more confrontational, women will send the state after you and will try to destroy you economically and socially

4
RondoOBlongo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ironically, Disney became a worse version of what he bemoaned the anime industry of. You can't look at the movies they make today and claim those writers know how real people act

view more: Next ›