Turns out ww3 isn't happening
(www.nytimes.com)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Neocons: "They're suicidal TERRORIST GOATFUCKERS whose first action would be to nuke Detroit."
Also neocons: "Lelz look at how they carefully try to choreograph a response prevent escalation, let's go mess with them some more."
Where did I say I wanted us to be more involved? Christ, sucking commie ballsacks the last few days has made you even more retarded.
I said neocons. I guess that part of the shoe fits. If you don't want to mess with them more, then good for you on that part at least.
You have class.
Nuking Detroit would be a net positive for all White Americans
I wish people would quit responding to this troll.
That was obvious. The strike against Fordow was carried out uncontested, and inflicted superficial damage. Like as not it was back channeled to whomever the Iranians have making those decisions, and their own retaliation was performative.
The pearl clutching was for naught. Again. Can we get back to mass deportations now?
It's very possible this isnt over, but yeah, in case this is the end of it, this is why you don't sperg out and go off the deep end. Because you look retarded if the things you're assuming will happen do not indeed actually happen.
Back to? Do you mean start?
Was it though? Not to a lot of people here.
Most people don't read history books.
Those who study history are doomed to watch those who don't repeat it.
Who said WW3 was happening? Is that a deflection to avoid talking about oil prices?
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19BZbWwEfy/x/c/4eU2YYqAfMG
Here's one example, complaining about how we're going to put boots on the ground/etc. How many do you want?
Pretty much everyone on here who suddenly shit on trump the last 72 hours could be included
The forever war isn't the same as WW3. China and Russia made clear that they don't want to get in this mess for Iran.
It now depends on America how much we "need" to intervene.
But you called him cringe too?
I'll take that as a yes
Yes, but I've always thought Trump was largely cringe, and I didn't vote for him because he was a failure the first time, and is only okay this time.
Sorry, I though we were talking about legitimate issues, not something you made up to deflect from coping that everyone seething here jumped the gun and blew their load early.
Oil prices might go up, or they might not. Opec controls a lot, and if Iran doesn't fuck around with the strait little will actually change.
Good, because if there's another intervention I want you first in the meatgrinder
I'm not for putting boots on the ground, and never have been.
People here just love to seethe about this shit.
Good, I'm looking forward to your posts against interventionism
You did the meme. And then, for no reason at all, peoples shat on Trump.
Like in 2017, all it took for CNN to love Trump was to go out and bomb a country with 0 justification.
The meme of noticing that everyone licked trumps sack, and then when he did something he said he'd do, you all lost your mind and decided to throw your lot in with a bunch of communist traitors?
Yeah, weird.
I guess nobody was supposed to notice that, because it causes you problems.
You ignored when I refuted this lie of yours, and now you're repeating it.
I mean, all you have is pure tribalism. "People I don't like also oppose this war of aggression." I've already pointed out that your position on Syria throws in your lot with the deep state and with Al Qaeda, so I guess you here admit that you're with Al Qaeda despite your denials.
I think this argument would have worked better on Stormgents than on me.
I cited trump from over a decade ago saying Iran can't be allowed to have nukes. I'm not sure how you can refute trumps own words, but by all means, keep making shit up. It's what you do best.
They didn't. They were negotiatng on their sovereign right on enrichment until Israel murdered their negotiator. It's like bombing Luxemburg and using as a justification that "they can't be allowed to have nukes". Do you have any independent thought or is it just regurgitating what the deep state war party tells you to believe?
I'd bother explaining it to you again if you were capable of understanding it, but you aren't.
You're a waste of oxygen.
When do we get to notice you are posting NYT?
Because it was the first source of the quote I had, showing the retards panicked over absolutely nothing.
Important text:
"Iran coordinated the attacks on the American air base in Qatar with Qatari officials and gave advanced notice that attacks were coming to minimize casualties, according to three Iranian officials familiar with the plans. The officials said Iran symbolically needed to strike back at the U.S. but at the same time carry it out in a way that allowed all sides an exit ramp; they described it as a similar strategy to 2020 when Iran gave Iraq heads up before firing ballistic missiles an American base in Iraq following the assassination of its top general"
Iran is in a lose-lose.
React firmly and you give an excuse to attack you more.
React like a pussy, and you encourage attacks because there's no deterrence.
I think they made the more dangerous choice here.