Turns out ww3 isn't happening
(www.nytimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
That was obvious. The strike against Fordow was carried out uncontested, and inflicted superficial damage. Like as not it was back channeled to whomever the Iranians have making those decisions, and their own retaliation was performative.
The pearl clutching was for naught. Again. Can we get back to mass deportations now?
It's very possible this isnt over, but yeah, in case this is the end of it, this is why you don't sperg out and go off the deep end. Because you look retarded if the things you're assuming will happen do not indeed actually happen.
Back to? Do you mean start?
Was it though? Not to a lot of people here.
Most people don't read history books.
Those who study history are doomed to watch those who don't repeat it.