Turns out ww3 isn't happening
(www.nytimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
The meme of noticing that everyone licked trumps sack, and then when he did something he said he'd do, you all lost your mind and decided to throw your lot in with a bunch of communist traitors?
Yeah, weird.
I guess nobody was supposed to notice that, because it causes you problems.
You ignored when I refuted this lie of yours, and now you're repeating it.
I mean, all you have is pure tribalism. "People I don't like also oppose this war of aggression." I've already pointed out that your position on Syria throws in your lot with the deep state and with Al Qaeda, so I guess you here admit that you're with Al Qaeda despite your denials.
I think this argument would have worked better on Stormgents than on me.
I cited trump from over a decade ago saying Iran can't be allowed to have nukes. I'm not sure how you can refute trumps own words, but by all means, keep making shit up. It's what you do best.
They didn't. They were negotiatng on their sovereign right on enrichment until Israel murdered their negotiator. It's like bombing Luxemburg and using as a justification that "they can't be allowed to have nukes". Do you have any independent thought or is it just regurgitating what the deep state war party tells you to believe?
I'd bother explaining it to you again if you were capable of understanding it, but you aren't.
You're a waste of oxygen.
When do we get to notice you are posting NYT?
Because it was the first source of the quote I had, showing the retards panicked over absolutely nothing.