Turns out ww3 isn't happening
(www.nytimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
They didn't. They were negotiatng on their sovereign right on enrichment until Israel murdered their negotiator. It's like bombing Luxemburg and using as a justification that "they can't be allowed to have nukes". Do you have any independent thought or is it just regurgitating what the deep state war party tells you to believe?
I'd bother explaining it to you again if you were capable of understanding it, but you aren't.
You're a waste of oxygen.
FYI: 'again' means that you did it before, which you didn't, because you couldn't.
Yes, I'm very stupid. So why do you keep losing debates to me?
I haven't lost anything, except braincells because you're too stupid to comprehend anything except gargling commie ballsacks. But that's normal for you eurotrash faggots.
Next time you're getting raped and murdered by an invading country, im going to say you deserve it and vote for people who won't get involved in it. Then you can be happy about the US not intervening, and everyone else can jerk each other raw about not being involved in new wars too.
Maybe the next batch of people will be worth something, instead of a bunch of shortbus rejects.
Ah well, if anyone didn't believe you when you said you lost braincells, this proved it.
So... never?
Good. GTFO and take your peanut allergy with you.