Historically, commies had hated the rainbows as much if not more. Read about Stalin, Mao or El Che, gays are seen as bourgeois decadence.
Where did the myth that only fascists hate lgtb come from? Why are so many rainbows commies?
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Because "fascism" means "not communism.". Has for eighty years.
As for why so many perverts are commies, it's for the same reason why so many criminals are commies. Because leftism is a satanic ideology tailor made for people who don't and shouldn't belong in society.
because the driving force of marxism is to arbitrarily divide the people in whichever way is most conductive to bringing them to their own destruction. i'm not familiar with that exact thing you reference but you mention bourgeois so i can only imagine it was simply branding them as that "class" by association
either way, whatever was the divisive weapon of choice in one century might be the complete opposite in the next, but the objective remains the same, and the "useful idiots" that adhere to the given ideology don't really care about the past at all, other than what hollywood teaches them
and they are quick to decry fascism through pure programming, nothing more
This:
Che Guevara imprisioned gays in foeced labor camps, Mao criminalized homosexuality, etc
Communists also killed Jews. You'll notice there were Jews and All sorts promoting communism in Germany and Russia until they disappeared.
They also (along with Jews) pushed homosexuality to help destabilize other countries and prep them for a revolution. Then, after gaining control, more opportunistic members kill the revolutionaries and old leadership to consolidate power.
It's a pretty well known pattern
What’s even more mind boggling is the fact that j’ws are always the main force behind promoting communist ideology and commie uprisings, while they control the entire economy at the same time and are obviously the true bourgeoisie, and yet, the average retard who buys into the commie lies somehow CANNOT see the very J’ish pattern behind the rich who are impoverishing the masses and destroying their nation. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE? To this day the average leftist has no fuckinh clue who they spent years bitching about and protesting against, all they know them by is monickers like “the rich”, “the billionaires”, “the 1%”….they never bother looking into who comprises the 1%, it’s so fucking stupid.
Alex Jones brainwashes right wing NPC’s in the same way, always telling you it’s “the globalists”, “Democrat operatives”, “the deep state”, “Chicoms”, etc, so none of his die hard followers ever bother looking into who the actual internationalists are who influence domestic and foreign policy in such an anti American anti-White way……that way you either think the problem is the Chinese government who is a million miles away in a place you have no ability to remove their influence from, or he redirects your frustration/hatred at the left, so you never realize it’s groups like AIPAC, HIAS, the ADL, the AJC, etc fucking with our system directly, from within our own borders, right where we could have an impact just by going to their facilities and protesting, or by filming them every time they go meet with our politicians in Washington.
People hate it when I say it, but historical commies managed to run functioning societies.
You don't launch a Sputnik with these blue-haired fat losers with 19 facial piercings.
People don't "hate" it, you're simply wrong as hell.
It's not a "functioning" society that almost poisons half the northern hemisphere because they didn't want to admit that they'd run a reactor test wrong.
It's not a "functioning" society when a typo results in lime green lipstick being the only legal color in the USSR, because nobody is allowed to admit that the government can make a mistake.
It's not a "functioning" society that court maritals a guy who saved the world by not launching nuclear weapons at a satellite blip.
The USSR was a fucked up joke of a society ran on nonstop torrents of lies, up was down and in was out, or else you got retired with a bullet.
All the nations of the mid 20th century were less degenerate than we are now, so comparing the USSR of the time to the United States of today is just stupid.
Stalin inherited a Russia with oxen and wooden plows. He left it with a nuclear arsenal and a space program. Say what you will about him but he understood human nature and what was necessary to run a functioning national power.
Pointing out that the Soviets eventually went through the industrial revolution half a century after everyone else did, is not a flex. At least not one in favor of communism.
It's like Bill Clinton taking credit for the economic boom of the nineties.
If is a testament to that generation of Soviet engineers though. Imagine what they would have been able to do if not hamstrung by retarded communists.
It's a testament that being shot if you fail is good short term motivation but inevitably creates a culture of constant lying and incessant ass covering.
The former is a necessity on account of the latter in any "diverse" society
I'd say making up a 100-year progress gap in thirty is in fact quite a flex if he could get such a backward shithole up to par with other countries but maybe we have different definitions. Also, look at some photos of Moscow in the 50s and 60s. Clean, safe, low crime, high trust, pure White. Barely any traffic and the cars are studiously minding the law. It's like the social order of pre-globalism Tokyo with the aesthetics of pre-war France.
Couple things.
A hundred years gap is only how long it takes to steal and imitate to reach near parity.
And they were absolutely not a high trust society that's my entire point. They were a place of constant backstabbing, ass covering and incessant lies.
In that sense yes, but OTOH the crime rate was low, there were none of these "western perversions" of post-91 Russia (crime, burglary, fencing stolen goods and forgeries, prostitution, rampant drug abuse) and both older and younger Russians know it.
You are either profoundly ignorant of communism or are just a Russian shill. People who actually lived through the USSR in the 50s and 60s will tell you how incredibly low trust the society was. People followed the law because one wrong move and you and your family would be sent to a prison camp in Siberia to be tortured for years. There's nothing redeemable about communism.
Is this really what we've become
Well when you shamelessly gargle communist balls, you're either a vatnik or a tankie.
Their society "functioned" in the same way functioning alcoholics do.
Which is to say, barely, and then you die.
And yet the US was terrified of them. Also didn't see any forced miscegenation of pure ethnic Russian neighborhoods at gunpoint but hey.
When has what the US government is afraid of had even a passing corelation with what would actually be a danger to the citizens?
you demonstrated that the space program was functional, not the society.
also, you are conflating things. 21st century wokeism is nothing more than the byproduct of the divisive identity politics that forms a key part of the first stage of communist take over. it's fairly irrelevant and detached from the end goal and does not really represent it. it's just useful idiots. once actual communism is in place they are the first to be told to dig the hole and get shot in the head.
You do when you have 200 German scientists leading the way and you're cool with a mass amount of your citizenry dying. We know communism is destructive because we won the Cold War
The founder of the modern rainbow insanity, Harry Hay, was a communist and a pedophile