She was appointed for the sole reason being a woman who would overturn Roe v. Wade, and that she did. (because she was replacing a woman and it was taboo in the senate to replace a female seat with a male, and especially if they were possibly the deciding vote on RvW).
Whether that was worth or not is left to the reader. Overturning that nonsense went beyond its direct effects because it cemented that made up nonsense precedents were not forever sacrosanct no matter how often it is repeated that they are.
But if there was a better woman(again, the senate would not have confirmed a man to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg) available in the appeals courts, I'm all ears.
Having two justices that had children trafficked in to adopt certainly didn't go well.
Man fuck the taboo for replacing a woman with a man. That’s what needs to happen. It’s taboo for a man to pretend to be a woman, but normies gobble that up so what do they know.
A based judge going for the no-effort tranny route just for a confirmation hearing, then going back to self-identifying as a man after the hearing would be a hilarious few days of CSPAN.
Overturning that nonsense went beyond its direct effects because it cemented that made up nonsense precedents were not forever sacrosanct no matter how often it is repeated that they are.
If I recall correctly, there was a Cuban woman in the running for ACB's seat who was, by all accounts, a female Alito. She might have been good. Oh well.
So according to the tweet, this is referring to threats from violent leftoids after the Dobbs leak rather than being about her protecting her imported zoo family from nationalist policies like I initially assumed. Still bad, because it shows women can be broken more easily but not proof she is ideologically captured.
She's a bad pick, but it's also a clear-cut case that alot of leftist 'wins' are explicitly because they're terrorists allowed to get away with being terrorists.
This is no surprise to anyone who posts here, but there's a slim hope that this'll help get it through normies fucking skulls that these are violent people that hate you and want you dead.
Women have absolutely no business in positions of power, Exhibit 3478.
We're starting the count at this year, correct?
Nah, just since last Thursday.
People warned Trump about her, but Trump picked her anyway.
Reap the just rewards, and maybe stop farming out judicial picks to the Federalist Society....
Trump is a retarded kikeslave faggot boomer who will do anything is masters tell him to
Wow!!! Somebody really really gets it. Nice! 👍
Everyone saw this coming. Trump does not pick them well.
She was appointed for the sole reason being a woman who would overturn Roe v. Wade, and that she did. (because she was replacing a woman and it was taboo in the senate to replace a female seat with a male, and especially if they were possibly the deciding vote on RvW).
Whether that was worth or not is left to the reader. Overturning that nonsense went beyond its direct effects because it cemented that made up nonsense precedents were not forever sacrosanct no matter how often it is repeated that they are.
But if there was a better woman(again, the senate would not have confirmed a man to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg) available in the appeals courts, I'm all ears.
Having two justices that had children trafficked in to adopt certainly didn't go well.
Man fuck the taboo for replacing a woman with a man. That’s what needs to happen. It’s taboo for a man to pretend to be a woman, but normies gobble that up so what do they know.
A based judge going for the no-effort tranny route just for a confirmation hearing, then going back to self-identifying as a man after the hearing would be a hilarious few days of CSPAN.
Why was overturning Roe even a concern? Let Dems and blacks genocide themselves. That was the dumbest battle to pick.
As I said
Roe was important because it said that prior scotus precedent could be changed? Okay...
If I recall correctly, there was a Cuban woman in the running for ACB's seat who was, by all accounts, a female Alito. She might have been good. Oh well.
Brown and a woman and still better than her? Fucking hell
So according to the tweet, this is referring to threats from violent leftoids after the Dobbs leak rather than being about her protecting her imported zoo family from nationalist policies like I initially assumed. Still bad, because it shows women can be broken more easily but not proof she is ideologically captured.
Just means that the right needs to start using tactics that work.
She's a bad pick, but it's also a clear-cut case that alot of leftist 'wins' are explicitly because they're terrorists allowed to get away with being terrorists.
This is no surprise to anyone who posts here, but there's a slim hope that this'll help get it through normies fucking skulls that these are violent people that hate you and want you dead.