That's unironically what leftists, libertarians, and zionist right wingers argue. They say it's fine if your liberties are infringed, so long as it's not government doing so (unless they're in power). They're perfectly fine with any other entity (like private corporations) turning you into a slave with no rights. They think concentration of power is only dangerous when government does it.
There's another roundabout reason for this.
Men are supposed to be strong, to fulfill our roles as protectors and providers. This role isn't just meant for our wives, children, and family, but for our neighbors, community, and nation. With the artificial push of feminism and the attack on men, masculinity, men's roles, the natural patriarchal form of society, and the rise of centralized government, globalism, and capitalism to usurp men's roles, the weakest people of society increasingly replace men with government and capitalism to protect and provide. This used to just be women, but increasingly includes more men, who become weak, from being emasculated by modern society, through fattening and poisonous food and drink, bad habits, free porn, bread and circuses, office jobs, less exercise, ease of living, and comfort.
Hard lives and adversity build strong men. Heights of civilization build comfort, ease, and safety, which weaken men. The feminization of society exacerbates this effect.
Thus, the weakest and most gullible of society, women and feminized/weak men, follow their replacement male leader (globalized government and capitalism), and espouse all of the globalized philosophies, arguments, and talking points, to remain part of the fake manufacturer tribe, so they're not ostracized, a death sentence for the weak.
A friendly reminder that Libre Office is free, open source, and works just like Microsoft Office.
That's a different user who mocks Dresden.
It's the classic normies right wing type of "conservatism". Regardless of medium or context (Hollywood, schools, music, societal practices, etc.), the subversives push subversion and degeneracy to 10, and then normalize it for a while. People increasingly cry fowl that everything's turned to crap, so then the subversives dial it back to 7. The normies cheer it as a victory. 7 becomes the new normal and is accepted by the normies. The subversives then pushel it to 17 and normalize it...
Repeat this process ad nauseum, and you get modern "conservatives", who defend the subversion and degeneracy in ever increasing incremental steps. Slowly, over time, however, there's an increasing population of people realizing what's going on and reject the entirety, or most, of the subversives push back to the beginning. These people are usually called far right, fascists, Nazis, and/or conspiracy theorists. They're (we're) called these names even by the normies conservatives who now actively defend the "dialed back" subversion and degeneracy.
Also, everyone alive today has been indoctrinated into this system of propaganda, which began before we were born. What people in their 30s and beyond, the normie conservatives, fail to realize is that their wish to go back to the "sane" times of their childhood is a mid point in this incremental increase of the subversion and degeneracy. To completely undo the subversion would require almost a complete dismantling and destruction of all current structures, behaviors, ideologies, and thought processes, to to back to a time before any of us were born.
From everything I can tell, no.
They probably just had enrichment plants to reuse their spent nuclear fuel rods. Iran does get some of its electricity from nuclear power, and spent fuel rods can be enriched over and over to use up roughly 98% of the mass. However, the enrichment percentage they supposedly had for their fuel rods isn't good enough for a nuclear bomb. The amount they'd have to use would make the bomb so large as to be unwieldable.
Trump admitted on camera last week that the Iran war is continuing purely for PR, because he wants to get the fissile material from the bombed nuclear plants.
?
Oh, Genesis 14:20. Yes. Abram tithed to Melchizedek. Apologies for not remembering all of it. The OT is really dense, and God repeats Himself a lot.
I've been modding ConPro for years. We were the first forum that the pedo tried to corrupt. We're extremely familiar with how he talks, how he acts, what arguments he uses, and how they've changed over time. We were so effective at banning him that he stopped trying it with ConPro for a while, and began doing it to other forums, like KiA2, gaming, MGTOW, and the like. Don't believe me? Ask around. Most people who've been here for years are very familiar with this guy. He's infamous, just like TheImp.
If this was purely about "free speech" and difference of opinion, I'm fine with it. What I'm not fine with is an obvious shill and pedophilia advocate subverting free speech forums to push their degeneracy, through the use of dozens of alts and ban evasion.
It comes from earlier than that. God wanted "first fruits" of things in Deuteronomy and Leviticus (earlier if you include some events in Exodus), where God was telling the Israelites how to obey God and be a righteous people, after He led them out of Egypt. But, God doesn't need any of our sacrifices, money, or things. The sacrifices were forward pointing to Jesus, and to feed the Levite priests who weren't portioned any land (to grow crops or cattle, leaving them at the mercy of the other tribes for food) in the newly conquered land of Israel, and the first fruits were meant to help other people (i.e. the church), as most Christians understand it today, which is what tithing is. Through the parable of the talents that Jesus taught, it's understood that God blesses us (with wealth, things, or even personal talent) so we can also help others, and not just use it to enrich ourselves.
I'm not sure about that stuff, but he's an experienced exorcist and has dealt with demons a lot. He and his colleagues have some interesting stories. I've come across several of his discussions about the topic.
Here's what I found digging through his profile for a bit.
Here he tries to defend a clear case of pedophilia interrupted, because the abductor never got the chance, and clearly we're all wrong and bad for assuming pedophilia of the sweet innocent child abductor:
Here he enthuisiastically talks about a 16 year old groupie with Steven Tyler, and defends it. If you're familiar with the pedojeet, at all, you know he makes these kinds of comments all the time, where he skirts the line and tries to make legitimate arguments on the surface, while subversively pushing for going over the line, which becomes more obvious over time. The year range of 14, 15, and 16 is very commonly used by him and all his alts.
https://communities.win/c/Music/p/1ASZfBWyKU/steven-tyler-is-headed-to-trial-/c/4ebm7w0RYCT?d=50
Here he defends drawings of pedophilia as "free speech", which the pedojeet does quite often.
Here he makes a low effort post to trash White people, White nationalists, and our intelligence, and the only person to respond to it is his buddy (or alt) DresdenFirebomber.
https://communities.win/c/TellScored/p/1ASZf4knri/why-is-everyone-who-considers-th/c
There was another comment he made that pushed it over the edge, where he was defending sex with minors, but I can't find it now, and I don't really care to spend the time looking for it because he has the comment history of a bot farm.
Other similarities to TheImp, is that he defends jews all the time, trashes White people, defends egalitarianism, hates "Nazis", and advocates for killing us (White nationalists).
Tagging u/CarmenOfSandiego as well if y'all are curious. If you don't ban him immediately, I'd bet you $5 you'll find grounds to ban him within the next week or two, because he can't control his own subversive tendencies, and he hates everyone here.
I banned him from ConPro for being an obvious pedojeet alt. He advocates for pedophilia.
He was also trolling ConPro the exact same time earlier this week that TheImp tried to troll ConPro with his newest alt DresdenFireBomber. So, they're most likely friends at the same shill farm, or the same person.
When I worked construction, most of our job was trying to figure out what the hell the engineers were thinking when they gave us their blueprints, because not one time were any of their measurements accurate to reality. They were just going off of what was in their records, and never came out into the field and measured a damned thing, leaving us, the lowly peons who work with our hands, to interpret their retardation.
It's been the same with every other field I've experienced or worked in. The academics and "experts" were the most highly educated retards on the planet, that I wouldn't trust to dig a hole in the ground.
Yep. Academics live in their own head, and as you said their error in beliefs aren't immediately punished like those who work physical jobs. When an academic believes themselves to be an expert, that ego trip floods into other areas. I, and anyone else that's been in a hopeless but lengthy debate, have come across it quite often. It always, always boils down to one single sentiment.
It occurs when people put themselves in place of God. They elevate themselves to godhood, and tacitly, or sometimes even explicitly, declare "I can't be wrong". It's a complete denial of their own humanity, of the intrinsic nature of what it means to be human, to be finite, imperfect (a sinner), and mortal. We can't know everything, ergo there will always be some information that will upend or change our conclusions. Gödel's incompleteness theorems prove this unequivocally, that no matter how much information we accrue, we can't fully encapsulate and define truth and reality. Therefore, truth (and God) are infinite. We, as humans, can't know everything or be absolutely certain of our conclusions. This doesn't mean we can't find snippets of truth, through sound logic, but it does mean our conclusions will change because we don't know all of the logically sound rules dictating what we're forming a conclusion on.
Good debate requires all parties to prioritize truth above all else, even above ourselves, and to be honest, logical, and civil, to enable that exploration of truth. If we do this, even if we're proven wrong, one party or both, in part or in full, then it's the best outcome for all, as we shed falsehoods and lies, and embrace, abide in, and understand truth more fully. Fools, liars, and egotists never do this, but instead double down on absurdity, to the point of insanity, and tacitly repeat over and over that they can't be wrong. It's the equivalent of a child sticking their fingers in their ears and screaming "nuh uh" in perpetuity, regardless of how profound their refutation.
When someone becomes egotistical, arrogant, and hubristic, no matter how much contrary evidence and logic is presented against their belief, they openly declare "I'm God". They prize themselves over truth, and the only thing that will ever convince them otherwise is reality punching them squarely in the face. Reality is harsh to falsehoods and lies, and the fewer barriers between us and nature, the more quickly that rightful punishment will occur. This is also why academics can propose ideas so contrary to nature that, if they ever attain power, it usually results in the deaths of millions.
This is another way you can tell TheDonald is just another form of manipulation by the exact same people running everything else. A quickly rotating news cycle prevents people from dwelling on any one thing for very long, to affect any lasting change, so the news cycle goes from one "BREAKING NEWS!!!" to the next, over and over and over. They learned that this also placates and controls people via the MK Ultra experiments.
They don't have Camp of the Saints (yet), but a good free speech publisher is Antelope Hill. You can find them here:
You're way behind. That was the "truth" yesterday. The new "truth" is different today.
I've seen a similar beginning shift with regard to narratives being pushed against Turkey. If true, then Turkey deserves it, as they were a quiet ally and big aid to ISIS when they were enacting a globohomo backed civil war in Syria, resulting in the deaths of millions.
If you read between the lines, and some explicitly given in FBI's post, this is exactly what it's about. He said criticism of Trump is fine, but criticism of jews is a "derangement" and won't be tolerated. Weird. He says it's a pro Trump and America First forum, and allows a certain level of criticism against Trump, but not if it involves jews.
For reference, I was banned from that forum a few years ago for talking about what instigated WW2, and not the kosher version taught in schools and Hollywood, and my comments had nothing to do with jews. I pressed the mods for why my comments were getting censored, and the only responses I got were inconsistencies, lies, and gaslighting, and then FBI banned me.
That guy is a liar and a hypocrite, and it's incredibly easy to discern his true allegiances.
Then there's the well poisoning in Europe, or opening the gates of Toledo to allow Muslims to conquer most of Spain, or the "Polish" who were murdering ethnic Germans in the newly created Poland after WW1, precipitating German invasion and WW2, or...
LOL?
You're right though. I've actually been an Iranian agent this whole time. You fooled my plans to uncover Trump's plans from this obscure internet forum from an anonymous Trump supporter. I woulda succeeded if it wasn't for you meddling kids.
Oh thank God. For the last 2 weeks I was thinking we would be told that we'd get an update in 2 weeks, that we'd get another BREAKING NEWS update in 2 weeks, that we won 2 weeks ago, but need to stay an additional 2 weeks. My next 2 weeks are saved. Thanks Donald Trump.
So...what "strategy" is Trump pursuing with Iran?
This is the exact argument I got into with my managers during Covid. They were "conservatives", so I asked them: "effectively, what's the difference if the government enforces all of this on us, as opposed to all of the corporations?" They didn't know how to respond and just skirted around the question to try to force the bullshit masks, social distancing, and such.