I'd like to remove their "public" designation in addition to removing all funding. It's deceptive. Basically no news company should get to call themselves "public", "American", "national", etc. They represent nothing good about America.
"No. The first amendment means our institution gets to say whatever it wants, and you the citizen should go to jail if we don't like what you say."
Anyways.. this lady is crazy. On the board at Signal. Former CEO of wikipedia. Member of the CFR, the World Bank, and the Atlantic Council. Literally the type of person NPR would spend all day taking a shit on, and now she runs the place.
These corrupt fucks will stop at nothing. They're going to insert themselves into every last corner of our democracy until they destroy it under the weight of their collective stupidity.
Terminal list is fiction. But it Depends what your adversary is - if you’re worried about the NSA spying on you - yes they probably have ways to decrypt it. (and they’re 100% storing your data to decrypt it when its easier).
If you live in a second tier country like Germany/Japan etc then it’s less likely they can see what you’re saying.
Obviously it's fuckin fiction, but the people who reviewed it for publishing never would have let a service that they actually couldn't get into be mentioned by the guy who talks about being a SEAL in the authors note where he states that the military reviewed and approved his novel to make sure it doesn't reveal any classified information like tactics.
When they first described her as "in tech", I was like 5 bucks says this ho can't code. It's still a fair thing to say. I'm jsut saying you know they didn't pick a technical leader.
women hate freedom. they have no use for it. they require protection and provision. if men were free they would have to give men something in exchange for what men provide. better to enslave all men, take all of their rights away, and create a gynocentric, female-ruled order.
Once again: if it's a platform, it gets special legal protection in exchange for not arbitrarily censoring speech. If you want complete control over what is said, you can be a publisher and legally take responsibility for everything said.
I have a hard believing the CEO of NPR is that ignorant, which suggests malice instead.
Ah yes, the most important part clearly is that you, a journalist and your outlets have freedom of speech. That common citizens also have that freedom is an "unfortunate nuisance". I see how it is.
Hurr-durr, the dumb things that I am trying to railroad through will never be used against ME! My people will always be in fashion/power, there is no need to think of the future.
Yes but no. If we have a dangerous censorious communist society, the id of 4chan and anonymous posting is one of the few weapons against the regime. Harsh truths that involve banning, debanking, censorship, with the powers of the printing press in the hands of the regime, manipulating womenfolk who were ever the most censorious of the regime
If we are no longer an openly moral society, not sure how 4chan isn't helpful in creating or finding wherever we go from here.
Anonymous and pseudonymous being linked versus real names and the current corporate climate hell of much of employment opportunites.
The problem was imageboards. A blessing and a curse because memes are so powerful, but removing the ability to post pictures/imglinks would take a huge weapon (CP) away from the people who keep trying to shut it down.
Yes, the main thing you would miss out on going to one of the alternative forums that have free speech (more or less) is images. Most people don't want to fuck with hosting uploaded images.
Dunno bout you, but X/twitter is the new 4chan, and it gets the benefit of allowing us to see the enemy directly, and they keep getting L’s like Mark Cuban getting dunked on by a 4’ tall supposed chinese woman account.
Also RINO’s, haven’t seen them not take an L since Oct 7th.
Haven’t seen cp. every now and then I tell it to tone down the liveleaks or tiktok algorythms/users.
Kind of yeah. All the discordfags, jannies, and three letter agencies and friends had to do was flood it. Just like that, no conversation, no reach, no worry - "AnYtHiNg GoEs!" is terrible policy, which is why it is important to discriminate. The tactics involved are real, written, and are as old as forums themselves. Our spaces are shrinking, so fuck that.
I look around and see all my platforms disappearing around me, and suppose one absurd day I said to myself "Maybe it's the one thing they got right".
Personally I keep you unblocked to laugh at you, slap you around a bit like a little clown. A living, breathing lolcow that belches out everything I've heard over the years sometimes things that I've previously believed.
No. Your kind would rather murder everyone because they dared to prove your imbecilic rhetoric wrong. You and your kind can never coexist with others, because your greed for power over others is your undoing,
Liar. You have often threatened people for merely discussing topics your political owners want silenced. You cannot stop me, scum.
You're a slave with no say in the politics of the government. You only have marching orders - when threads posted here go against the whims of your masters, you immediately derail the discussions within with your idiotic, desperate whining.
Then you have the cowardice to report those who dare call you out on your behavior.
I'd like to remove their "public" designation in addition to removing all funding. It's deceptive. Basically no news company should get to call themselves "public", "American", "national", etc. They represent nothing good about America.
What a white pill to hear. I love hearing how the Constitution is doing it's job well.
Thank you for articulating this perspective. I needed that reframing whilst I stare out at the current dystopia.
"No. The first amendment means our institution gets to say whatever it wants, and you the citizen should go to jail if we don't like what you say."
Anyways.. this lady is crazy. On the board at Signal. Former CEO of wikipedia. Member of the CFR, the World Bank, and the Atlantic Council. Literally the type of person NPR would spend all day taking a shit on, and now she runs the place.
These corrupt fucks will stop at nothing. They're going to insert themselves into every last corner of our democracy until they destroy it under the weight of their collective stupidity.
Anyways.. I hope this bitch is vaccinated.
That's disappointing. Another point in the "Signal is a honeypot" column.
Signal is called out, by name, in The Terminal List book which the author said was reviewed and approved by the military.
That means it's compromised.
Terminal list is fiction. But it Depends what your adversary is - if you’re worried about the NSA spying on you - yes they probably have ways to decrypt it. (and they’re 100% storing your data to decrypt it when its easier).
If you live in a second tier country like Germany/Japan etc then it’s less likely they can see what you’re saying.
Obviously it's fuckin fiction, but the people who reviewed it for publishing never would have let a service that they actually couldn't get into be mentioned by the guy who talks about being a SEAL in the authors note where he states that the military reviewed and approved his novel to make sure it doesn't reveal any classified information like tactics.
When they first described her as "in tech", I was like 5 bucks says this ho can't code. It's still a fair thing to say. I'm jsut saying you know they didn't pick a technical leader.
bring back slapping women that say incredibly dumb shit
women hate freedom. they have no use for it. they require protection and provision. if men were free they would have to give men something in exchange for what men provide. better to enslave all men, take all of their rights away, and create a gynocentric, female-ruled order.
and so here we are.
The longhouse.
Patriarchy is the Middle East where women are chattel and can be abused and will be put to death for getting raped.
America is gynocentric at the least.
Once again: if it's a platform, it gets special legal protection in exchange for not arbitrarily censoring speech. If you want complete control over what is said, you can be a publisher and legally take responsibility for everything said.
I have a hard believing the CEO of NPR is that ignorant, which suggests malice instead.
Ah yes, the most important part clearly is that you, a journalist and your outlets have freedom of speech. That common citizens also have that freedom is an "unfortunate nuisance". I see how it is.
Of course, “bad information” is just code for “telling the truth” nowadays
She’s a Jew.
Maher huh?
That's the most jewish thing I've read this week so far.
National Putrid Rodeo
Hurr-durr, the dumb things that I am trying to railroad through will never be used against ME! My people will always be in fashion/power, there is no need to think of the future.
I really want to be like Woman... But I feel maybe I've been too hard on women lately so I'm going to chalk this up to her being a woman.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Yeah there’s no need, the comments are bad enough they’ll collect plenty of downvotes don’t worry.
"Excuse me sweaty, if you imprison murderers you will eventually imprison everyone, for any reason! Slippery slope!!!"
Lmao lurk more faggot
I'm confused, how are you posting if you are banned?
Maybe one of his other accounts is banned.
I wonder how many he has?
You can always go back to reddit.
We're not going to make the same mistake that 4chan did. Pool's closed fag.
4chan itself was a mistake.
Yes but no. If we have a dangerous censorious communist society, the id of 4chan and anonymous posting is one of the few weapons against the regime. Harsh truths that involve banning, debanking, censorship, with the powers of the printing press in the hands of the regime, manipulating womenfolk who were ever the most censorious of the regime
If we are no longer an openly moral society, not sure how 4chan isn't helpful in creating or finding wherever we go from here.
Anonymous and pseudonymous being linked versus real names and the current corporate climate hell of much of employment opportunites.
The problem was imageboards. A blessing and a curse because memes are so powerful, but removing the ability to post pictures/imglinks would take a huge weapon (CP) away from the people who keep trying to shut it down.
Yes, the main thing you would miss out on going to one of the alternative forums that have free speech (more or less) is images. Most people don't want to fuck with hosting uploaded images.
Dunno bout you, but X/twitter is the new 4chan, and it gets the benefit of allowing us to see the enemy directly, and they keep getting L’s like Mark Cuban getting dunked on by a 4’ tall supposed chinese woman account.
Also RINO’s, haven’t seen them not take an L since Oct 7th.
Haven’t seen cp. every now and then I tell it to tone down the liveleaks or tiktok algorythms/users.
Plenty of people do live in a censorious communist society, so 4chan could be working for them.
Kind of yeah. All the discordfags, jannies, and three letter agencies and friends had to do was flood it. Just like that, no conversation, no reach, no worry - "AnYtHiNg GoEs!" is terrible policy, which is why it is important to discriminate. The tactics involved are real, written, and are as old as forums themselves. Our spaces are shrinking, so fuck that.
"YoU'rE nO dIfFeReNt ThAn ReDdIt!"
I look around and see all my platforms disappearing around me, and suppose one absurd day I said to myself "Maybe it's the one thing they got right".
Personally I keep you unblocked to laugh at you, slap you around a bit like a little clown. A living, breathing lolcow that belches out everything I've heard over the years sometimes things that I've previously believed.
It's like a damn pullstring.
Yeah, because we should compromise our way onto train cars or we're just as bad as them, right?
Fuck off
Did you have a stroke? Or did the chatgpt bot shit itself? I can't tell
Yes. But idgaf. I'd rather ban ass cancer retards and gatekeep
No. Your kind would rather murder everyone because they dared to prove your imbecilic rhetoric wrong. You and your kind can never coexist with others, because your greed for power over others is your undoing,
Liar. You have often threatened people for merely discussing topics your political owners want silenced. You cannot stop me, scum.
You're a slave with no say in the politics of the government. You only have marching orders - when threads posted here go against the whims of your masters, you immediately derail the discussions within with your idiotic, desperate whining.
Then you have the cowardice to report those who dare call you out on your behavior.