Once again: if it's a platform, it gets special legal protection in exchange for not arbitrarily censoring speech. If you want complete control over what is said, you can be a publisher and legally take responsibility for everything said.
I have a hard believing the CEO of NPR is that ignorant, which suggests malice instead.
Once again: if it's a platform, it gets special legal protection in exchange for not arbitrarily censoring speech. If you want complete control over what is said, you can be a publisher and legally take responsibility for everything said.
I have a hard believing the CEO of NPR is that ignorant, which suggests malice instead.
You're talking in ideals. In practice it hasn't been that way.