Setting aside the proud cuckold's attempt to distract us from discussing the actual content of the video, this guy makes good points. Most people point to WW2 or the 60s as when the West started getting all fucked up, but the downward spiral was already ongoing.
TLDW: The thesis is If Germany won WWI, the conditions for the Russian Revolution and Weimar Germany would not have happened which would have prevented the Nazi rise to power and thus WWII.
The video leans heavily on hypotheticals, and I question if things really would be different if Britain and France were given the Versailles treatment instead of Germany. We probably would have seen another socialist French revolution at the very least, and with the British empire being what it was, I would not put it past them to kick off WWII instead.
Notwithstanding your blathery non-denial-denials, it is a fact that color video didn't exist in 1910, that the life expectancy in 1910 was about 47, and that the food was very frequently unsafe to eat in 1910.
I'm aware that you are capable of googling "life expectancy 1910" and repeating what the AI summary tells you but incapable of understanding what average life expectancy actually means.
I give you a hint. If you have two people and one has a annual income of a million dollars while the other has an annual income of 50 000$ dollars the average annual income would be 525 000$.
But let me give you another hint because otherwise you'll definitely not get it. Infant mortality.
Yes, infant mortality was high. But even if you survived infancy, your chance of making it to age 10 was comparatively very low. And even if you survived that, your chance of dying from parasites or malnutrition was comparatively very high.
And yet this is your "golden age of human civilization."
If it makes you feel any better, I prefer the old definition of pedophile: someone who's attracted to a prepubescent child. A little kid with no grass on the field. A wee'un who's still more interested in Spider-Man than girls.
The word took a weird-ass turn and now it refers to a 20 year old who thinks a 17 year old is comely.
Go watch your wife get stuffed by another man and fuck off. No one gives a shit about what your faggy leftist low-T soy ass thinks.
In fact, the fact you didn't like the video is even more reason everyone else should watch it.
And also, you're a fucking sub-70 IQ retard if you don't think colorization of black and white video effects don't exist. There's even a whole documentary of it.
If you colorize an old video, you're altering it. You're adding contemporary guesswork to something.
But I don't actually think this video is colorizing anything. I think it's just post-WW1 footage being presented as pre-WW1 footage. I think, in a nutshell, that it is lying to you.
jews are the reason. WWI was just another symptom
Who financed it?
jews
Setting aside the proud cuckold's attempt to distract us from discussing the actual content of the video, this guy makes good points. Most people point to WW2 or the 60s as when the West started getting all fucked up, but the downward spiral was already ongoing.
TLDW: The thesis is If Germany won WWI, the conditions for the Russian Revolution and Weimar Germany would not have happened which would have prevented the Nazi rise to power and thus WWII.
The video leans heavily on hypotheticals, and I question if things really would be different if Britain and France were given the Versailles treatment instead of Germany. We probably would have seen another socialist French revolution at the very least, and with the British empire being what it was, I would not put it past them to kick off WWII instead.
He's showing colorized videos of crowds. There's no plausible way those could have existed before 1925, roughly a decade after WW1.
I only watched a few minutes of this. I wasn't interested in drinking in the full hour. But I present to you this link:
https://xkcd.com/1227/
Was 1910 really the golden age of humanity? The life expectancy was about 47 and your food could literally kill you any time you tried to eat a meal.
This has to be one of the most profoundly dumb things I've ever read.
Doesn't surprise me that you don't know how statistics work.
You are either an incredible idiot or a troll.
First time seeing a homotomato comment? For you that was the greatest case of retadation you've ever seen, but for him, it was Tuesday.
Considering the account isn't even 3 months old I suppose it's possible. Didn't read the comment sections too much in the last few months.
He is a fucking mongoloid.
Notwithstanding your blathery non-denial-denials, it is a fact that color video didn't exist in 1910, that the life expectancy in 1910 was about 47, and that the food was very frequently unsafe to eat in 1910.
I'm aware that you are capable of googling "life expectancy 1910" and repeating what the AI summary tells you but incapable of understanding what average life expectancy actually means.
I give you a hint. If you have two people and one has a annual income of a million dollars while the other has an annual income of 50 000$ dollars the average annual income would be 525 000$.
But let me give you another hint because otherwise you'll definitely not get it. Infant mortality.
Yes, infant mortality was high. But even if you survived infancy, your chance of making it to age 10 was comparatively very low. And even if you survived that, your chance of dying from parasites or malnutrition was comparatively very high.
And yet this is your "golden age of human civilization."
"comparatively"
Yeah, comparatively. They didn't all die at 3 in 1910, and we don't all live to 500 today.
Holy instagram ahh comment. Usually when I see this cope, its usually from foods or white nights trying to call men "pedos" for not wanting roasties.
Foods?
If it makes you feel any better, I prefer the old definition of pedophile: someone who's attracted to a prepubescent child. A little kid with no grass on the field. A wee'un who's still more interested in Spider-Man than girls.
The word took a weird-ass turn and now it refers to a 20 year old who thinks a 17 year old is comely.
Also life sucked in 1910.
Go watch your wife get stuffed by another man and fuck off. No one gives a shit about what your faggy leftist low-T soy ass thinks.
In fact, the fact you didn't like the video is even more reason everyone else should watch it.
And also, you're a fucking sub-70 IQ retard if you don't think colorization of black and white video effects don't exist. There's even a whole documentary of it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They_Shall_Not_Grow_Old
Fuck off forum sliding queer.
If you colorize an old video, you're altering it. You're adding contemporary guesswork to something.
But I don't actually think this video is colorizing anything. I think it's just post-WW1 footage being presented as pre-WW1 footage. I think, in a nutshell, that it is lying to you.
I hope someday your account just stops posting.
Because you finally stuck a pistol in your mouth.
And yes, I really mean it.
Yes, we all know you're an evil sociopath. You don't have to advertise. The forum knows.
I'm curious: did you actually sit through that hour-long video, or did you just think "this looks kewl" and post it without watching?
They pay you TOO much.
Peak Redditard; chef's kiss.