Look at you volunteering to summarize every long video without a human summary!
Great work man. The hours you are willing to commit to save us form human-slop is just ... a real contribution!
Thanks in advance, buddy!
Who the fuck knows.
I can't imagine that any of his party leadership thought this was a good idea.
I wouldn't vote for a homosexual, transsexual, etc. just because he is anti-immigration
ONP should never have picked this guy to represent them. Why would they do that when they are finally getting recognition as a viable party of opposition. All of their votes are from country electorates and blue collar workers.
I don't think ON cares about anything other than Muslim immigration and illegal immigration. The attitude is like this: 'As long as they're not Muslim and come legally
Yeah, nah.
Pauline launched her career by saying that she was concerned that there were too many Asian immigrants over here; and that the blue collar workers of her constituency have real concerns.
As far as I know, Pauline has been fantastically consistent. She wants new immigration to be much, much lower than it is now.
A quick search brings this up:
Our policy includes capping annual arrivals, deporting illegals, enforcing an eight-year citizenship waiting period, reforming student visas, reinstating temporary protection visas, and withdrawing from the UN Refugee Convention.
There has been considerable heat directed at ONP for not vetting its candidates well enough. This would be a total bombshell if the ONP leadership selected this clown without knowing he was a pillow-biter who intended to make a big deal out of his love for smoking Muslim pole on his first day at work.
As for Trump and the Iran war; I don't give a shit. Trump is punishing the living fuck out of China, actually acknowledging the cold war that the USA is in with the CCP. Venezuela was a major supplier of Chinese oil, followed by, you guessed it, Iran.
If Iran got suitable fissile materials the first target would be Tel Aviv, but the second target would be a major US city. They would smuggle the device into the country in a shipping container and drive it down from Canada or something.
Besides, none of this is a surprise. Trump has spoken many times that he would help the people of Iran through off their death-cult leadership.
The fact that Albo would rather suck Chinese cock than help our single greatest military ally secure OUR OWN fuel supply says everything we need to know about the Labor Party.
I assure you I'm much more concerned about him declaring that he loves migrants than I am about him taking it up the bum.
His Indonesian Muslim Boyfriend is fucking dead if he ever heads back to a mosque in Indonesia. He probably doesn't attend in Australia either. Fine. Whatever.
But Deciding that this was the content of his maiden speech is just mad! His party ran on the position of reducing immigration and resisting the yellow tide from Asia. WTF? The party leadership has egg all over their face right now. Why did they pick this faggot? Anyone wearing an orange shirt who Pauline Hanson endorsed would have won. Why pick him to get his arse on the velvet?
Please Explain.
You are describing a carjacking where the aggressor shot the driver because he didn't hand over his vehicle.
That is much more clear.
Thank you.
So, to be clear, you want a person to sit down with a pencil and a sheet of paper and be able to draw something that gets them sent to prison as a sex offender?
You know that is literally prison for wrong think, right?
Lets test some edge cases.
Does stick figure art count? What if it is clearly labeled with ages?
How about drawing midgets? Does that count for prison time?
What about skinny midgets? What about badly drawn skinny midgets?
How about fantasy races like Gnomes? What about Grogu? He is tiny, but he is 50, but he is a child?
And you trust judges to be fair about this?
Guy, I have worked security in [Redacted]. I've seen the gangs of 30 kids roaming the streets at night burning rubbish bins, stealing ambulances and taunting dogs. The oldest of them was 11. I'm not even going to start discussing Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. let alone Failure To Thrive, or consanguineous unions.
You are making all kinds of assumptions that do not bear out in the face of reality.
It isn't fair or right that babies must pay for the sins of their parents, but I didn't make the rules.
Smith, you are a well respected expert on faggotry. I assumed this would fall under your extensive list of faggot hobbies.
You know, we have some experts around here that we could call for their opinions on booty bumping kits.
/u/BandageBandolier u/Smith1980 u/The_Shadow_of_Intent
What do you think of Booty Bumping as a harm reduction method? Is heroin less dangerous if you stick it up your butt? How about crack or meth?
Given the massive prevalence of both faggotry and drug use in down town Toronto, was $USD 3 Million too much? Or not enough?
Personally I think the government should be convicting and executing people who peddle cheap Chinese fentanyl, but I'm no expert on faggotry or drugs.
Yes, exactly. It is the natural conclusion of the liberal world view.
If liberalism is the axiom, then people must be the same to make the philosophy work. We are watching people adjust reality to fit their pet theory, rather than throwing out a broken idea to better understand the world as it is.
Brother, I see the point you're making with the three-men-on-an-island example, but I think it actually supports rather than undermines the tribal view.
In reality, those three men would almost certainly die fairly quickly. As soon as any one of them is unable to provide food for himself for even a couple of weeks (injury, illness, bad luck hunting/gathering), he is at a massive disadvantage. In a tropical environment where food might seem plentiful, infections run rampant; the first time one cuts his foot badly, he will likely die of infection without group support for care, sharing, or protection.
Individuals on their own die alone and have no reproductive future. As a result, they actively seek out people of like mind or values and join forces with them, or they adapt their values and behaviors to fit the tribe in order to survive. For roughly four hundred thousand years of human history, shunning or exile was effectively a death sentence.
This doesn't deny that individuals are unequal or that they bring different strengths and weaknesses. Quite the opposite: it is precisely because people are unequal that they form tribes, allying with others who complement their weaknesses and amplify their strengths in the face of a harsh world.
Think of individuals as sub-atomic particles. They exist, they have unique properties, and they can interact; but they are far too unstable and vulnerable on their own to form the basic building blocks of a functioning, long-term society. The tribe is the atom; the smallest stable unit that can actually survive, reproduce, and compete in the real world. The tribe isn't just a "molecule" that emerges optionally from individuals; it has been the essential survival unit for our species across almost our entire evolutionary history.
I appreciate the thoughtful reply. We actually agree on far more than we disagree here.
You're spot on that liberalism's biggest failure is its egalitarianism: the insistence on treating everyone as interchangeable equals despite the obvious reality that no two people (or groups) are equal. The slide from "equality of opportunity" to demands for equal outcomes, the empire-management origins you described, and the way it blinds itself to race realism all flow from that core flaw. I also agree that many self-described "conservatives" are really just classical liberals who don't realize they're not truly right-wing; they're the least tribal of all, clinging to an individualism that leaves them politically powerless.
That said, I still see the deeper root in classical liberalism's individualism itself. Humans have never been equal; for individuality to exist, differences must exist, and those differences create advantages or disadvantages depending on context. Equality could only exist in a world with no meaningful variation at all. Once you accept that the atomic unit of society is the tribe, not the autonomous individual, it follows that tribes compete. Some tribes have more successful or adaptive traits than others on average. It is also clear that observable differences exist between races of humans; otherwise there would be no perceivable distinctions.
James Lindsay is terrified that conservative White males will accept the Critical Theory tribe's demolition of liberalism, organize along racial and cultural lines, and see that the appropriate response is a race war. He knows that the White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant (or Lutheran) people have more capability and economic production than the rest of the world put together (see WWI and WWII). Should this group become sufficiently motivated, they will be more effective than any other group in history. Lindsay feels that accepting reality as it is leads directly to a racial pogrom to reclaim the western world from a (literal) invasion from Africa and the Middle East.
I see why this makes him uncomfortable.
This is very close to my take on Lindsay too. He's a classical liberal and an academic mathematician at heart. With the Long March through the Institutions basically complete, a relatively conservative academic simply has no place left in the modern university system. Critical Theory and its children (intersectional feminism, CRT, etc.) were explicitly designed to undermine and supplant modern liberalism; Lindsay has responded to it quite effectively.
That said, I think the root of the problem runs deeper: Classical Liberalism has been deeply flawed from the start. The atomic unit of society is the tribe, not the autonomous individual. In the natural world, a lone human being is extraordinarily rare and incredibly vulnerable. By ourselves we have no reproductive future. A single bad year of food gathering/production, stepping in a hole and breaking some toes, or getting a bad fever that stops us from working; any one of those could be fatal to an individual without the support of a tribe. Individuals certainly do make choices, but those individuals almost always align into groups that compete with other groups. This directly contradicts classical liberalism's foundational assumption that the informed, rational individual is the smallest meaningful unit of society. The implications of this error of thinking are sweeping.
James has done an excellent job understanding the techniques and tactics of Critical Theory proponents. His breakdowns of how Woke followers operate like a cult are particularly sharp. However, he has baulked at where his own investigation has led him. James's major issue is that once you accept that the atomic unit of society is the tribe, then you realize that a major force within society is tribal conflict. Some tribes are more successful (White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant) and some are more ruthless (Muslims); the inevitable conflicts are trending towards a vindication of racism as practiced by the Ku Klux Klan; which James hates with a passion. Liberalism was never correct, and he now attacks those who have moved past it.
If you haven't noticed, the board has been flooded with glowies.
It is getting a bit depressing.
Ivermectin was the frontline treatment for SARS and MERS, both of which were a corona virus.
None of the "Warpspeed" treatments would have been approved if there was an existing treatment protocol, with a drug regimen. Experimental drugs are only approved for use on the public while there is no existing treatment.
When Trump brought Ivermectin to world attention by mentioning it, it became imperative that it be discredited so Pfizer could make obscene amounts of money by rolling out under tested gene therapy.
And the media complied like a well trained Labrador.
Don't limit yourself. You can marry a man for a visa, too.
Hit up u/BandageBandolier
He has low standards and smells of desperation. He would probably treat you pretty well.
You mean, don't be a console 'tard?
Only one game that I can think of had genuine cross platform play without nerfing the crap out of PC players. Shadowrun (2007). I can't remember a time when a Console 'Tard ever beat the most inept of PC players in the match score.
The most inept clown with a mouse and keyboard could spank the most idiot-savant console 'tard with a controller.
A better question: Why in the world would PC Gamers want to let Console 'Tards vomit stupid all over our PVP matches? They will just lose and then whine endlessly about 'hax' or something similar.
A woman's value is directly tied to her ability to have a family.
A good rule of thumb is that a woman's fertility halves every year over 32. The quality of those eggs also falls dramatically.
It is very common for a woman to miscarry the pregnancy after an abortion. So if a woman has had an abortion, she might take a long time to get pregnant, then lose the baby.
Observe the attached chart I found.
https://femia.health/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Monthly-fertility-rate-by-age-1024x658.jpg
Thank you for finding a moment between sucking cocks. Your competence places you above the other faggots.
Things will get worse before they get worse.
Protestantism emphasized a direct relationship with God through Christ, without requiring a priest as intermediary for forgiveness (priesthood of all believers). Confession is primarily to God; ongoing sin still has consequences; the congregation can exercise discipline, even removal from fellowship. But ultimate judgment of the soul belongs to God alone.
That you need a priest to tell you the state of your soul and to advise you as to how you should atone is your decision. Personally, I can tell when I've sinned and through study of the bible and sincere prayer, I can repent and atone. I am probably much harder on myself than a Priest would be to technical Catholics.
Employers can do all the vocational testing they want.
Employer: "Here, lets see if you have the skills to handle a customer phone enquiry."
Applicant: "Oh goodness gracious me. My English is not so good. My accent is very heavy."
The place I live in did that too.
The budgets now come out of the Department of Corrections budget. Major prisons have a forensic mental health wing.
Smaller states negotiate to send forensic mental health patients to another state which has a facility to warehouse them.
People are still locked up for life.
Could've you just not read the useful AI summary?