8
DemolitionsPanda 8 points ago +8 / -0

Pee Wee Herman deliberately got caught in a theater to leverage the morality clause in his contract to end a (more or less) exploitive business relationship.

His incident was completely victimless.

8
DemolitionsPanda 8 points ago +12 / -4

Everyone knows that if people rush a food distribution depot, then the most effective response is to offer hugs and kisses.

There is no way that organized gangs would ever try to seize food. It is even less likely that there would be riots.

/s

14
DemolitionsPanda 14 points ago +14 / -0

It makes things more complicated, but it isn't inherently weaker.

It was certainly built this way because it was easier to make it strong than a curved bridge.

The reason that it is shit is because there is going to be a pile of vehicles at the bottom where they came off the bridge trying to speed around the turn.

12
DemolitionsPanda 12 points ago +12 / -0

I recall Candice being slapped in the face by the reality of the situation, then climbing the learning curve in a hurry

It was kind of impressive how fast she worked out that the media narrative was full of shit and that Old KiA actually knew what was going on.

I think ZQ was especially cunty and KiA was actually heeded. Both are true.

10
DemolitionsPanda 10 points ago +11 / -1

Lots of "SIDS" cases are, historically and currently, mother's smothering their babies.

A woman turns an unwanted baby into an outpouring of support from her family and community. She is blameless.

The medical examination shows that the baby just stopped breathing, which is exactly consistent with being gently smothered with a pillow or plastic bag, etc.

There will never be any way to tell how much of SIDS is infanticide, but is much, much higher than none.

SIDS has always been the medical community carrying water for mothers murdering their babies.

5
DemolitionsPanda 5 points ago +5 / -0

No worries. Just point to a post where I have called for violence against any particular group.

Otherwise admit that you are being fucking indiscriminate with your belittling and accusations.

It is only recently that this board has taken on an anti-Jew and anti-Zionist tone, and certainly not everyone here holds that, or any other, view.

I suspect that you are impervious to reason; but hope spring eternal that learning can occur.

5
DemolitionsPanda 5 points ago +6 / -1

You first.

Take some direct action and post some videos about it.

Lead by example, or continue to be a cock sucking faggot, by your own terms.

2
DemolitionsPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, Gizortnik. Here we go.

It isn't theft. Theft, by definition ,requires that the criminal deprive someone of something. You can't steal a digital product.

For example, if you steal my car, I can't drive my car. That is theft. Downloading episodes of Magnum PI isn't theft.

It isn't copyright infringement, because that (by definition) covers the uncompensated reproduction and sale of an intellectual property. Training a LLM with an e-book doesn't copy or sell the book.

I think that you need to go and read some definitions, because you are groping in the dark for reasons to object and using words you don't actually understand.

If you want to advocate for new laws that govern how people can create and run computer programs on hardware they own, then advocate for that. You will certainly have a lot of company.

0
DemolitionsPanda 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, the book isn't copied or stored. The LLM can't regurgitate it on command, because it isn't inside the model.

You can ask the LLM to write new, never before seen text in the style of that author.

Training a LLM is a lot more like reading a book to a toddler than it is like making a digital copy. Neither the toddler or the LLM can repeat the words of the book.

8
DemolitionsPanda 8 points ago +9 / -1

Do you?

For example, do you think there is a practical difference under law from letting a text to speech application read you an e-book from Amazon, vs training your Large Language Model with an e-book from Amazon?

If there is a difference, in your mind, what do you think that it is?

2
DemolitionsPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is only cool when Christians do it.

Unironically.

1
DemolitionsPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indiana Google search for "Why are there no Christians in Iraq"; and I got articles written as recently as this year.

There have been a few massacres, and the government turns a blind eye to brutal discrimination..Christians are charged higher prices and can't find work. I am sure that Night Letters are regularly used to tell them to leave town or something awful will happen to their kids.

Sadam was secular, but he was strongly against Iran and their influence. In effect, that meant all of the army and the senior government officials of his government were Suni Muslim or non-denominational .

When Iraq was gutted following Gulf War 1, Saddam cut spending to about 80% of the armed forces. The only part of the army really remaining was the officer corps. Officers train men and they perform the executive functions required to run an effective army. With a strong officer corps, the Iraqi army would have been able to train fighting men in six months or a year with more money and more equipment.

Gulf War 2 had the Iraqi army resolved by executive order. At that point all of the officers left. It was clear that the country would fall to the Shiite (Iranian) faction and they would probably be executed.

Some of those officers formed the core of Islamic State.

Islamic State mostly targeted Shiite Muslims, but both the Shiite and Suni factions agree that Christians and Jews can die.

That entire region is openly hostile to Christians since Gulf War 2. Everywhere religious extremists get into power, they shoot the Christians. For a recent example, See Afghanistan since Biden fucked up the pull-out.

26
DemolitionsPanda 26 points ago +26 / -0

What do the leftist shills call it? Normalization?

"In America, good boys have their dicks cut off. See how happy they are?"

24
DemolitionsPanda 24 points ago +24 / -0

You can't accept that immigrants will leave their religion or culture behind.

They might say they will, but they are lying. You just wind up with Crypto Muslims, who practice in secret until they have enough political leverage to change the environment.

The only answer is to refuse every single Muslim specifically because they are a Muslim.

Otherwise mostly men will apply; they will receive residency or citizenship. They will import wives (up to five each) and have five children per wife. This will continue until they have a voting block.

0
DemolitionsPanda 0 points ago +2 / -2

Iran has been up to its armpits in the "ethnic cleansing" (genocide) of Iraq. After the USA removed Saddam Hussein and his Sunni officers from control of the Iraqi army, Shiite factions, sponsored by Iran have taken over the country.

Christians and Sunni have all been killed or driven out. The country is more-or-less a puppet state for Iran. This was achieved through systematic executions; which are certainly terrorisms.

The Iraqi state oil reserves are still being exploited by US selected contractors; but the proceeds of the oil sales go to Shiite aligned religious factions that are cozy with Iran.

The Iraqi oil reserves are some of the biggest in the region, partly because others have depleted theirs.

This 100% counts as effective use of terrorism. It has profited Iran and Shiite aligned political actors to the tune of multiple billions of dollars.

2
DemolitionsPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the first two article are reporting on how the USA was involved in the Iranian coup

I literally said that they were. What is your point?

Do you know that there is a specific name for this fallacy? It is called the genetic fallacy. It goes like this:

THING started this way, therefore THING is still the same!

I will give you a specific example.

Volkswagen was founded by Nazis. Therefore Volkswagen is a Nazi company.

A lot of water has passed under the bridge since 1953. Indo t think the Shiite religious extremists were particularly loyal to the CIAs goals at the time. I put it to you that the CIA has engineered the change of regime in Iraq specifically to oppose.iran. That would have been unnecessary if they were secretly taking orders.

Address the point of piss off.

3
DemolitionsPanda 3 points ago +3 / -0

They really are not

Yes, the CIA empowered the religious extremist and helped them take power; just like they did in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

All three of those were to stop that country from becoming cozy with Russia.

None of those regimes stayed loyal to the USA.

Later the CIA put Sadam into power in Iraq, specifically because he would opposed the Shiite Muslims, who are strongly aligned with Iran. Remember the Iraq Iran war?

Sadam didn't stay loyal either.

5
DemolitionsPanda 5 points ago +5 / -0

If it doesn't have a tail, its not a monkey. Even if its got a monkey kind of shape. If it doesn't have a tail, its not a monkey. If it doesn't have a tail, its an ape.

2
DemolitionsPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems like it was a security vehicle with flashing lights that looked close enough when parked on the street.

16
DemolitionsPanda 16 points ago +16 / -0

The simplest answer is that he had a real police SUV and a real police uniform.

One parked overnight in a lot would not be noticed missing until morning. By the it would not matter.

1
DemolitionsPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd like to see Joe Sixpack taking accountability for the slaves they enjoy by meeting them face to face and being responsible for them.

The current method we have of offshoring slavery to third world nations, where it is out of sight and out of mind is dishonest.

7
DemolitionsPanda 7 points ago +7 / -0

How so?

The main character is utterly useless and nothing he does matters.

God is real and is an interventionist god who can (and does) fuck with mortal humans; he just won't intervene to help anyone, especially the Jews.

1
DemolitionsPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then have the courage of your convictions and bring back chattel slavery in the Roman style.

I am not even against it. Repeal that bit of the constitution and make it an open-season free-for all for snatching illegals. Get yourself a strong one.

Remember Roman slaves had rights and a path to citizenship. Rome actually had a crisis because too many slaves became citizens and it affected the cultural makeup of Rome.

view more: Next ›