It causes SIDS too. Turns out, babies just don't randomly die for a couple weeks after being born. It's because their brand new biological systems were being bombarded with largely untested chemicals.
Mark that down as one of those things where I can't help but think "how the fuck are normies actually retarded enough to be gaslit into believing this is an actual thing that just happens." Holy shit how retarded can you get.
They just accepted that it was related to infant sleeping position and crib padding.
As though there wouldn't have been ancient grandmothering traditions established if it mattered whether letting kids sleep on their backs vs. their bellies was killing babies since the dawn of time.
They are bombarded with ‘science’ from an early age for 20 years. Told by everyone in authority that its good and necessary. Then denied ’medical services’ for their child if they refuse to jab them with poison. The whole while they are convinced that its the greatest good and that those who disagree are evil idiots. Its truly diabloical.
Well, it does. A very small percentage of babies are born with undetected heart defects and they just...die. But it's a lot rarer than the public thinks. Probably close to 1 in 10000.
The overwhelming majority of "SIDS" cases are simple parental neglect. The data is all there and the correlations are blinding if you're capable of breaking free of the conditioning.
I'm not really talking about the concept of certain obvious factors like that contributing to random infant deaths. It should go without saying that very rarely things like that could happen. More so the notion that there is a "syndrome" that just randomly kills infants for no good reason at all. That is asinine. There is always a reason. The term has clearly evolved into something that functions to sweep other issues under the rug.
There's a relatively new study that suggests that they lack some specific enzyme and that is the reason the brain doesn't send those alarm signals that cause them to wake up, when they stop breathing. But the sample size isn't all that great and there's definitely more research needed still.
I mean, they aren't saying that it's totally the reason, just that there seems to be a correlation. So I don't see why it should be completely dismissed. I just mentioned the sample size, because I do think it's too small to be definitive.
Lots of "SIDS" cases are, historically and currently, mother's smothering their babies.
A woman turns an unwanted baby into an outpouring of support from her family and community. She is blameless.
The medical examination shows that the baby just stopped breathing, which is exactly consistent with being gently smothered with a pillow or plastic bag, etc.
There will never be any way to tell how much of SIDS is infanticide, but is much, much higher than none.
SIDS has always been the medical community carrying water for mothers murdering their babies.
I watched a vid on ancient Japan and hoo-boy. it was very much an active practice back then there. It's very much a dark part of our species that isn't soon to stop.
I was showing some of these studies to some people in the leftist internet bubble and they 'debunked' the peer reviewed scientific studies with a blog post from one guy with an opinion who didn't know why they did the science the way they did.
I don't think very many people are truly going to be able/allow themselves to fathom the depths of the evil that has been done to the Western world over the last 100-150 years or so by our "leaders".
I was never one to really board the whole autism vac thing.. but I mean. There are an awful lot of em these days it seems. I am but one man who can only live one life time, so my perspective and scope is admittedly quite limited. I have no idea if humanity has just been silently dealing with them since time immemorial, but with the internet, it sure feels like there's been a spike in my lifetime.
I know the mid 20th century had that whole psyche ward thing going on, but I'm pretty sure those were mostly populated by schizophrenics. Not autists.
It causes SIDS too. Turns out, babies just don't randomly die for a couple weeks after being born. It's because their brand new biological systems were being bombarded with largely untested chemicals.
Mark that down as one of those things where I can't help but think "how the fuck are normies actually retarded enough to be gaslit into believing this is an actual thing that just happens." Holy shit how retarded can you get.
They just accepted that it was related to infant sleeping position and crib padding.
As though there wouldn't have been ancient grandmothering traditions established if it mattered whether letting kids sleep on their backs vs. their bellies was killing babies since the dawn of time.
They are bombarded with ‘science’ from an early age for 20 years. Told by everyone in authority that its good and necessary. Then denied ’medical services’ for their child if they refuse to jab them with poison. The whole while they are convinced that its the greatest good and that those who disagree are evil idiots. Its truly diabloical.
Well, it does. A very small percentage of babies are born with undetected heart defects and they just...die. But it's a lot rarer than the public thinks. Probably close to 1 in 10000.
The overwhelming majority of "SIDS" cases are simple parental neglect. The data is all there and the correlations are blinding if you're capable of breaking free of the conditioning.
I'm not really talking about the concept of certain obvious factors like that contributing to random infant deaths. It should go without saying that very rarely things like that could happen. More so the notion that there is a "syndrome" that just randomly kills infants for no good reason at all. That is asinine. There is always a reason. The term has clearly evolved into something that functions to sweep other issues under the rug.
Parental neglect or just moms (primarily, but I'm sure some dads too) that kill their kids.
SIDS is a thing though.
There's a relatively new study that suggests that they lack some specific enzyme and that is the reason the brain doesn't send those alarm signals that cause them to wake up, when they stop breathing. But the sample size isn't all that great and there's definitely more research needed still.
Bad sample size is how fake studies are produced. Its how they got Aspartame cleared despite it causing cancer.
Its how I passed chemistry class by dropping bad batches from my groups chemical yield to game the final grade.
I mean, they aren't saying that it's totally the reason, just that there seems to be a correlation. So I don't see why it should be completely dismissed. I just mentioned the sample size, because I do think it's too small to be definitive.
Here's the study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35533499/
Lots of "SIDS" cases are, historically and currently, mother's smothering their babies.
A woman turns an unwanted baby into an outpouring of support from her family and community. She is blameless.
The medical examination shows that the baby just stopped breathing, which is exactly consistent with being gently smothered with a pillow or plastic bag, etc.
There will never be any way to tell how much of SIDS is infanticide, but is much, much higher than none.
SIDS has always been the medical community carrying water for mothers murdering their babies.
I watched a vid on ancient Japan and hoo-boy. it was very much an active practice back then there. It's very much a dark part of our species that isn't soon to stop.
But in modern times they check a dead baby's lungs for microscopic fibers/plastic particles to see if the cause of death was smothering.
I was showing some of these studies to some people in the leftist internet bubble and they 'debunked' the peer reviewed scientific studies with a blog post from one guy with an opinion who didn't know why they did the science the way they did.
It's sad they don't Trust The Science.
I don't think very many people are truly going to be able/allow themselves to fathom the depths of the evil that has been done to the Western world over the last 100-150 years or so by our "leaders".
What worries me is that they will be able to understand but they'll be too scared of the solution to truly admit it to themselves
Fast trials; death penalty.
We're gonna need alot of electric chairs
Worth listening to - only 1 minute:
https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1939747230430425130
I was never one to really board the whole autism vac thing.. but I mean. There are an awful lot of em these days it seems. I am but one man who can only live one life time, so my perspective and scope is admittedly quite limited. I have no idea if humanity has just been silently dealing with them since time immemorial, but with the internet, it sure feels like there's been a spike in my lifetime.
I know the mid 20th century had that whole psyche ward thing going on, but I'm pretty sure those were mostly populated by schizophrenics. Not autists.