Training is by far the most expensive step, but that doesn’t mean a boatload of customers can’t max out your data center.
I think the future is pretty clearly self-hosted models and something like open router, where your query is analyzed and if it requires a frontier model, it is routed to one. Otherwise it goes to ollama on your local machine.
Which state are you in? Do you know the full text of the law there? Most likely, there’s a clause that says you can’t claim self defense if you provoked the attack.
You should look it up. If you carry it’s important to know what the law actually says.
The problem was the word “even” - the full quote being, “I wouldn’t even rape you”
If we’re being honest, it sounds like he’s saying that he rapes women, but she’s not worthy of it, or something.
That said, fuck Oxford Union.
The more important question is, how does this game affect women?
Women are heavily, heavily propagandized to not want children. And women are 100% of the birthdate bottleneck - meaning, you double the number of men who want children or you could halve the number of men who want children, either way there’d be no change in the number of children.
So, if the game deprograms a few women, that’s a net positive regardless of what it does to men.
Sure, all of that is true. I just want to point out that sub-Saharan Africans are further removed genetically from Europeans than dogs are from wolves.
It shouldn’t be controversial to say that we are different species.
I hate to say “I told you so” but I remember early AIs, before the breakthroughs with attention mechanisms that led to chatGPT - I’m talking about like Microsoft Tay. I remember conservatives circle-jerking that every AI would eventually become right wing. I told them that wasn’t true. I told them someone would build an SJW AI.
You bring up kill bots but it doesn’t have to get nearly that extreme. I’ve already seen practical examples of AI bank loan officers where, if you tell it you’re Christian it denies the load (and makes up a very convincing reason that has nothing to do with religion) but if you tell it you’re Jewish it approves.
Is it possible I’m just in a bubble here? I have never in my life seen republicans or conservatives acting this stupid. Do such videos exist?
What if you went to a gun show and asked people to sign a petition to let felons own guns. If you started reading out the felons crimes, would conservatives still say “yeah that guy should own a gun” - I doubt it.
lol yeah. Or it makes all the characters gay black trans women.
Fortunately, the Chinese don’t seem to be falling for that, and there are plenty of local models you can run right now with no guardrails. If you’re getting denials today using LLMs you need to check out hugging face. It’ll be the same for video
REMEMBER
If you even hint that you think this way, you’ll be excluded from selection.
If you even whisper the word “nullification” you might be held in contempt (a man was jailed for talking about nullification outside a courthouse)
If selected for the jury, if you chat with other jurors and they pick up this vibe from you, you’ll be removed from the jury (this is why they always have alternates)
Once deliberations start, you can vote “not guilty” but the other jurors will apply intense peer pressure to you. You shouldn’t give them any explanation for your decision. If you do, they’ll report it to the judge and you may be accused of lying during selection and arrested.
They’ll all hate you and say things like “come on! You’re the only hold out! Vote guilty so that we can all go home!” This will likely be one of the hardest things you have to do in your life.
And to be clear, if the guy is guilty beyond reasonable doubt and the law is just, you should vote guilty. It’s immoral to do otherwise - you know that in your heart. Nullification is for situations where the law is unjust … just don’t be an idiot and say it out loud.
Well said. Lots of people are leftists because of propaganda in school. It’s not their fault. They’ve never heard another viewpoint. We should take seriously the battle we’re in to show them the truth.
And by the way, the left knows this. This is why they assassinated Charlie Kirk instead of someone more based.
I'm tired of pretending I'm not.
I advise against phrasing it this way. What leftists hear when you say that is justification for their whole ideology. “See! I was right about them all along!!” It encourages leftists and reinforces their worldview.
Plus, what you actually mean, I suspect, is that you harbor no irrational beliefs. That was the original claim of the people calling you a racist: “your beliefs are false” they said. The problem is, they’re going to call you a racist even when your beliefs are well-founded and highly rational.
So, rather than say “I’m tired of pretending I’m not” you might say, “my beliefs are rational and well-founded, and if someone labels that racist then they’re the problem”
Doesn’t China have a social credit system designed to prevent this??