FAKE NEWS. This fine young American gentleman did not kill anyone. Scammerjeets aren't even human, lower than even a maggot. What, is washing your hands prior to eating murder?
When I was selected for jury duty in 2012, every White male was reshuffled, disqualified, and sent home before we could be seated. I guess we were going to be too judgmental on the chain-nigger-traffic-collisions case near the Dallas zoo.
I actually have to call in for jury duty next week. I don't know anything about the case I might be on, but I definitely know how I will be voting if there is any diversity involved.
If you even hint that you think this way, you’ll be excluded from selection.
If you even whisper the word “nullification” you might be held in contempt (a man was jailed for talking about nullification outside a courthouse)
If selected for the jury, if you chat with other jurors and they pick up this vibe from you, you’ll be removed from the jury (this is why they always have alternates)
Once deliberations start, you can vote “not guilty” but the other jurors will apply intense peer pressure to you. You shouldn’t give them any explanation for your decision. If you do, they’ll report it to the judge and you may be accused of lying during selection and arrested.
They’ll all hate you and say things like “come on! You’re the only hold out! Vote guilty so that we can all go home!” This will likely be one of the hardest things you have to do in your life.
And to be clear, if the guy is guilty beyond reasonable doubt and the law is just, you should vote guilty. It’s immoral to do otherwise - you know that in your heart. Nullification is for situations where the law is unjust … just don’t be an idiot and say it out loud.
You shouldn’t give them any explanation for your decision. If you do, they’ll report it to the judge and you may be accused of lying during selection and arrested.
Yeah, just say you don't believe it and refuse to elaborate.
"If you all vote Not Guilty, we can ALSO all go home. I'm just looking at the case presented, but you seem focused on things outside the case right now. Case looks not guilty to me, and I won't risk condemning someone not yet beyond reasonable doubt, because you want to go get a Starbucks. Take this seriously! It's not beyond reasonable doubt."
A law is only just if it is applied equally. If the defendant is white, and the "victim" isn't, I will apply the OJ Simpson standard for "beyond reasonable doubt". If the victim is white and the defendant isn't, I will be using using the Derek Chauvin standard.
This is my internal reasoning only obviously. I'm not an idiot, so I won't be bragging about my intentions. I suspect they will strike me before I even get a chance anyway, since lawyers don't like putting engineers on the jury. We are too likely to see through their bullshit.
If it had been a white CEO (lol good joke) humiliating a nigger employee this would be the rallying cry of every sweaty inflamed low T commie larper faggot on the Internet.
The murder happened way back in 2019 for those that didn't read TFA.
The jeet CEO also looks so fucking smug.
Confusion over who would kidnap the successful tech executive and cannabis entrepreneur turned to fear after he was found dead hours later on one of his cannabis properties — having sustained stab wounds and a fatal gunshot wound to the back of the head.
Both men had worked for Atre in August of 2019 on one of his cannabis properties — doing mostly manual labor putting up fence posts and planting. Investigators interviewed both men in December 2019, two months after Atre's murder and learned they'd only worked for him for less than two weeks. But in that short period of time there was a lot of animosity. Lindsay and Charters apparently lost a set of Atre's car keys, and then they learned he had stopped payment on their paychecks.
The keys were found and Atre eventually did pay Lindsay and Charters for their work, though only partially.
TFA is pretty short and still seems to leave out a lot of details.
This sounds like less of a tech CEO shitting on tech workers. And more like a rich jeet asshole trying to fuck with contractors on his cannabis sidehustle. As is their way.
"Does this story of Tushar humiliating Stephen Lindsay and Kaleb Charters point to motive?" Tracy Smith asked her.
"Yes," replied Fulginiti. "Definitely."
She says the fact that both men were in the U.S. Army Reserve might also play into lingering resentment.
"When you look at the Army Reserve, right, and you look at the Army or any of the military operations, I mean, they're taught respect," says Fulginiti. "And here he is feeding into that disrespect … and mistreatment."
The humiliations being 1) making them do pushups in front of other employees, and 2) withholding paychecks, as the screenshot says.
I could see how that would lead to murder doing that to the wrong person tbh. Blue collar guys go ballistic with even the slightest problems with pay. Add to that the perception that the CEO thinks less of them than a bug, a little mental instability, and this could happen.
Q. Your main character was not only dead, but he also comes across as extremely unpleasant. Was it tough to write about him?
I heard all the stories about Tushar, but wanted to step back and make sure that I was not biasing myself with negativity around the guy – but I am governed by the facts.
I did try to present him in the round. We’re all complicated people, but I’ve got to just kind of write it the way it happened. He’s kind of at war with himself a lot of times. And he’s kind of coming from outside cannabis – he’s kind of a square but likes the adrenaline of being on the edge. So I wanted to capture that element. Hopefully, people can see that suddenly being in the cannabis world would create a kind of paranoia.
He was disliked to the extreme and tried to venture into an industry riddled with drug gangsters.
Q. It reads like “Murder on the Orient Express,” where there were so many people who might want Tushar dead. But you knew who had been arrested from the start. How did that influence the book?
I hadn’t really thought about this until just now, but the fact that they had four people in jail awaiting trial freed me up to do more reporting and not get carried away with the whodunit. It freed up my subjects too, because they weren’t suspects anymore.
I never had access to the detectives because the cases are ongoing, but I could build all of the police procedural chapters out of court documents, which was a kind of map of how there were a lot of persons of interest and suspects, so there was a kind of natural whodunit.
What weed company did this pajeet run or co own? Just curious what the quality was like especially with Indian growers Alot of weed isn't even properly cured or dried right
As a white person, this fellow white person is not guilty of all charges if I'm on the jury.
Sure he killed someone, but he didn't mean to. His situation was bad and he felt threatened ... and other DEI language shit.
Welcome to the new world. Your rules on how to behave as an ingroup bias work against you too.
FAKE NEWS. This fine young American gentleman did not kill anyone. Scammerjeets aren't even human, lower than even a maggot. What, is washing your hands prior to eating murder?
Exactly you can't murder what isn't human.
I wouldn't resort to DEI language. If his boss was illegally withholding wages, he's not guilty because he shot a conman who was stealing from him.
It's not illegal or immoral to repel invaders from your home.
You'll never be selected as the juror, being huwite male will get you dismissed right away
Looks like blackface is back on the menu!
"Yo honor, dis shit be wack dawg"
This is true.
When I was selected for jury duty in 2012, every White male was reshuffled, disqualified, and sent home before we could be seated. I guess we were going to be too judgmental on the chain-nigger-traffic-collisions case near the Dallas zoo.
As a White person, unless he harms another White person, he's innocent.
We offered the olive branch of "equal rights" and they spat in our faces. Time to go back to playing by their rules.
I actually have to call in for jury duty next week. I don't know anything about the case I might be on, but I definitely know how I will be voting if there is any diversity involved.
REMEMBER
If you even hint that you think this way, you’ll be excluded from selection.
If you even whisper the word “nullification” you might be held in contempt (a man was jailed for talking about nullification outside a courthouse)
If selected for the jury, if you chat with other jurors and they pick up this vibe from you, you’ll be removed from the jury (this is why they always have alternates)
Once deliberations start, you can vote “not guilty” but the other jurors will apply intense peer pressure to you. You shouldn’t give them any explanation for your decision. If you do, they’ll report it to the judge and you may be accused of lying during selection and arrested.
They’ll all hate you and say things like “come on! You’re the only hold out! Vote guilty so that we can all go home!” This will likely be one of the hardest things you have to do in your life.
And to be clear, if the guy is guilty beyond reasonable doubt and the law is just, you should vote guilty. It’s immoral to do otherwise - you know that in your heart. Nullification is for situations where the law is unjust … just don’t be an idiot and say it out loud.
Yeah, just say you don't believe it and refuse to elaborate.
The marxists engage in jury intimidation. Remember their faces.
"If you all vote Not Guilty, we can ALSO all go home. I'm just looking at the case presented, but you seem focused on things outside the case right now. Case looks not guilty to me, and I won't risk condemning someone not yet beyond reasonable doubt, because you want to go get a Starbucks. Take this seriously! It's not beyond reasonable doubt."
Not called in today. Maybe tomorrow.
A law is only just if it is applied equally. If the defendant is white, and the "victim" isn't, I will apply the OJ Simpson standard for "beyond reasonable doubt". If the victim is white and the defendant isn't, I will be using using the Derek Chauvin standard.
This is my internal reasoning only obviously. I'm not an idiot, so I won't be bragging about my intentions. I suspect they will strike me before I even get a chance anyway, since lawyers don't like putting engineers on the jury. We are too likely to see through their bullshit.
Somehow, I don't think the leftoids are going to be cheering for this particular assassin.
Kill the rich ceos! Noooo not like that!
If it had been a white CEO (lol good joke) humiliating a nigger employee this would be the rallying cry of every sweaty inflamed low T commie larper faggot on the Internet.
I honestly couldn't picture a white CEO doing this in the current day. This is textbook overmotivated jeet behavior. Happens in India all the time
Brother I can barely picture a white CEO at all in current day
I was just about to say.
Yup
NO! NO! NO NO NO! DO NOT REDEEM!
HE MURDERER SAAR!
> Forced to do 500 pushups in order to get paid for work he already did
> proceeds to kill boss
Good.
Jeet FA.
Jeet FO.
SAAAAAAAAAAR! I DO NOT WANT FIND OUT! NO FIND OUT SAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!
Needs to happen more.
Oh no.
Anyway.
The full story
The murder happened way back in 2019 for those that didn't read TFA.
The jeet CEO also looks so fucking smug.
TFA is pretty short and still seems to leave out a lot of details.
This sounds like less of a tech CEO shitting on tech workers. And more like a rich jeet asshole trying to fuck with contractors on his cannabis sidehustle. As is their way.
Partial pay? After that kind of humiliation?
Military-style execution completely justified.
The humiliations being 1) making them do pushups in front of other employees, and 2) withholding paychecks, as the screenshot says.
I could see how that would lead to murder doing that to the wrong person tbh. Blue collar guys go ballistic with even the slightest problems with pay. Add to that the perception that the CEO thinks less of them than a bug, a little mental instability, and this could happen.
Ah, so the jeet was an enemy combatant directly targeting United States Armed Forces reservists.
The retaliation was absolutely justified.
You would think if there was anyone who would be used to some asshole telling them to do pushups. /s
One down, 1,999,999,999 to go.
He should be celebrated. Good on him.
Lesson learned, cardio and neckbeards do not work well together. Next time, try leg presses.
Shooting the bastard was just business.
Stabbing him was for pleasure. 😎
Based. I'll donate to his whatever.
Based.
He didn’t do anything wrong.
Hey, brother... Can you spare some ska? was a great album.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ne3ciOGZM8
MFW
Tushar Atre in The Final Redemption.
Who cares about some jeet? Not even the jeets care. They believe in reincarnation, probably come back as a tapeworm.
CBS 48 hours made an episode about this 2022 case.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/sneak-peek-who-shot-the-tech-exec/
https://thecinemaholic.com/where-are-kurtis-charters-and-joshua-camps-now/
not guilty
He tried to invest in marijuana farms.
He was disliked to the extreme and tried to venture into an industry riddled with drug gangsters.
I’m really surprised this doesn’t happen more often.
Why? White men are far too civilized to violently repel invaders. A blessing and a curse, really
He did America proud
Self-defense. Stealing paycheck is attempted murder.
Sounds justified to me.
What weed company did this pajeet run or co own? Just curious what the quality was like especially with Indian growers Alot of weed isn't even properly cured or dried right
Oh no! Not 500 pushups! HORRIBLE!
-10,000 izzat saar
Pretty sure death for being a scheming jeet cunt while you were alive is far more unpleasant. Just saying.
Notice how it says "helped others"
What others? Who were they? Is the only reason they aren't being named or shown due to their race?
No, they were all white. It shows on one of the articles I saw