White man kills his jeet CEO
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
As a white person, this fellow white person is not guilty of all charges if I'm on the jury.
Sure he killed someone, but he didn't mean to. His situation was bad and he felt threatened ... and other DEI language shit.
Welcome to the new world. Your rules on how to behave as an ingroup bias work against you too.
FAKE NEWS. This fine young American gentleman did not kill anyone. Scammerjeets aren't even human, lower than even a maggot. What, is washing your hands prior to eating murder?
Exactly you can't murder what isn't human.
I wouldn't resort to DEI language. If his boss was illegally withholding wages, he's not guilty because he shot a conman who was stealing from him.
It's not illegal or immoral to repel invaders from your home.
You'll never be selected as the juror, being huwite male will get you dismissed right away
Looks like blackface is back on the menu!
"Yo honor, dis shit be wack dawg"
This is true.
When I was selected for jury duty in 2012, every White male was reshuffled, disqualified, and sent home before we could be seated. I guess we were going to be too judgmental on the chain-nigger-traffic-collisions case near the Dallas zoo.
As a White person, unless he harms another White person, he's innocent.
We offered the olive branch of "equal rights" and they spat in our faces. Time to go back to playing by their rules.
I actually have to call in for jury duty next week. I don't know anything about the case I might be on, but I definitely know how I will be voting if there is any diversity involved.
REMEMBER
If you even hint that you think this way, you’ll be excluded from selection.
If you even whisper the word “nullification” you might be held in contempt (a man was jailed for talking about nullification outside a courthouse)
If selected for the jury, if you chat with other jurors and they pick up this vibe from you, you’ll be removed from the jury (this is why they always have alternates)
Once deliberations start, you can vote “not guilty” but the other jurors will apply intense peer pressure to you. You shouldn’t give them any explanation for your decision. If you do, they’ll report it to the judge and you may be accused of lying during selection and arrested.
They’ll all hate you and say things like “come on! You’re the only hold out! Vote guilty so that we can all go home!” This will likely be one of the hardest things you have to do in your life.
And to be clear, if the guy is guilty beyond reasonable doubt and the law is just, you should vote guilty. It’s immoral to do otherwise - you know that in your heart. Nullification is for situations where the law is unjust … just don’t be an idiot and say it out loud.
Yeah, just say you don't believe it and refuse to elaborate.
The marxists engage in jury intimidation. Remember their faces.
"If you all vote Not Guilty, we can ALSO all go home. I'm just looking at the case presented, but you seem focused on things outside the case right now. Case looks not guilty to me, and I won't risk condemning someone not yet beyond reasonable doubt, because you want to go get a Starbucks. Take this seriously! It's not beyond reasonable doubt."
Not called in today. Maybe tomorrow.
A law is only just if it is applied equally. If the defendant is white, and the "victim" isn't, I will apply the OJ Simpson standard for "beyond reasonable doubt". If the victim is white and the defendant isn't, I will be using using the Derek Chauvin standard.
This is my internal reasoning only obviously. I'm not an idiot, so I won't be bragging about my intentions. I suspect they will strike me before I even get a chance anyway, since lawyers don't like putting engineers on the jury. We are too likely to see through their bullshit.