I'm not the one claiming either of those are modern, in fact I've been explicit that I'm talking about historical context. It's not disingenuous to look at history as a whole, and very clearly label which time period you're talking about, rather than being myopically focused on only one period or mislabeling things as modern.
I swear it's like whenever you get half an inkling of something that sounds like a gotcha you latch on like a dog and jump to post some snarky reply before even finishing the thought process and checking it makes sense. Like I said, laziness is habit forming, even in basic logic error checking.
Dude. Who are you? My debate coach? No? Then you can understand why you’re being an obnoxious piece of shit. Especially when you know why they’re different but feel like going but achually and thinking I’m here to learn debate from you.
When you act retarded and have the gall to call someone else a retard, I don't know why you wouldn't expect them to want to rub your nose in it until you start to feel shame for the shit you just deposited on the table.
I don't need your permission to point out why you're being dumb every time you reply, who the fuck are you to think people have to put up with your shit-talking quietly?
You are the one going but achually when you know its not a hijab. You are a retard and an obnoxious one. You dont have to put up with my “shit talking” which is telling you you’re being an idiot by going but achually. You can just go fuck yourself
The wimple is basically just a renamed 12th century hijab, the Europeans saw it in the crusades and thought "These backwards heathens are savages, but their women not being so vain about their hair isn't such a bad idea." and brought the idea back where it proceeded to dominate European fashion for over a century.
You've said over and over again that they're not the same and I know it, without having the faintest clue what you're talking about. They are in fact the functionally very closely related and it's retarded that you're this attached to the idea they're not when you apparently know nothing about European history.
I'm not the one claiming either of those are modern, in fact I've been explicit that I'm talking about historical context. It's not disingenuous to look at history as a whole, and very clearly label which time period you're talking about, rather than being myopically focused on only one period or mislabeling things as modern.
I swear it's like whenever you get half an inkling of something that sounds like a gotcha you latch on like a dog and jump to post some snarky reply before even finishing the thought process and checking it makes sense. Like I said, laziness is habit forming, even in basic logic error checking.
Dude. Who are you? My debate coach? No? Then you can understand why you’re being an obnoxious piece of shit. Especially when you know why they’re different but feel like going but achually and thinking I’m here to learn debate from you.
When you act retarded and have the gall to call someone else a retard, I don't know why you wouldn't expect them to want to rub your nose in it until you start to feel shame for the shit you just deposited on the table.
I don't need your permission to point out why you're being dumb every time you reply, who the fuck are you to think people have to put up with your shit-talking quietly?
You are the one going but achually when you know its not a hijab. You are a retard and an obnoxious one. You dont have to put up with my “shit talking” which is telling you you’re being an idiot by going but achually. You can just go fuck yourself
The wimple is basically just a renamed 12th century hijab, the Europeans saw it in the crusades and thought "These backwards heathens are savages, but their women not being so vain about their hair isn't such a bad idea." and brought the idea back where it proceeded to dominate European fashion for over a century.
You've said over and over again that they're not the same and I know it, without having the faintest clue what you're talking about. They are in fact the functionally very closely related and it's retarded that you're this attached to the idea they're not when you apparently know nothing about European history.