Muzzies always lie to make themselves seem more popular
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
The wimple is basically just a renamed 12th century hijab, the Europeans saw it in the crusades and thought "These backwards heathens are savages, but their women not being so vain about their hair isn't such a bad idea." and brought the idea back where it proceeded to dominate European fashion for over a century.
You've said over and over again that they're not the same and I know it, without having the faintest clue what you're talking about. They are in fact the functionally very closely related and it's retarded that you're this attached to the idea they're not when you apparently know nothing about European history.
Is a nuns habit the same as a hijab. Yes or no
What is that retarded reductionism supposed to solve? No a modern nun's habit is not the same as a hijab and a habit is not the same as a 12th century wimple either l, so I don't know why you keep trying to change the subject like that.
A Benz is also not the same as a Ford, but you'd have to be dumb not to see they came from the same schools of thought and cross pollination of ideas. And actually retarded to claim they're not both still cars.
She is not claiming theyre both head coverings or clothes. She is implying theyre hijab alikes. Its amazing how far you will equivocate to try and miss that point the muslim is making
You are just trying to make it incredibly reductive to the point where like you said you want to claim theyre both cars or clothes in this case when theyre very different in terms of the usage and ideology behind the religions behind them
Hijab is literally just the Arabic word for barrier/covering.
She didn't say "a hijab" meaning the noun for a type of clothing. She said just said hijab, as in the very concept of covering, specifically in the context of women. That's how they talk, and if you can't keep up you're just going to flounder and make false statements.
So yes, she actually is claiming they're both coverings, but you got so stuck on "foreign word bad!" that you're willing to deny historical truth to deny any similarities rather than focusing on the real cultural incompatibilities. Like being rapey pedophile warmongers. A belief in religious modesty is the benign sugar coating for the poison underneath, and you're just drawing more attention to the sugar.