What is that retarded reductionism supposed to solve? No a modern nun's habit is not the same as a hijab and a habit is not the same as a 12th century wimple either l, so I don't know why you keep trying to change the subject like that.
A Benz is also not the same as a Ford, but you'd have to be dumb not to see they came from the same schools of thought and cross pollination of ideas. And actually retarded to claim they're not both still cars.
She is not claiming theyre both head coverings or clothes. She is implying theyre hijab alikes. Its amazing how far you will equivocate to try and miss that point the muslim is making
You are just trying to make it incredibly reductive to the point where like you said you want to claim theyre both cars or clothes in this case when theyre very different in terms of the usage and ideology behind the religions behind them
Hijab is literally just the Arabic word for barrier/covering.
She didn't say "a hijab" meaning the noun for a type of clothing. She said just said hijab, as in the very concept of covering, specifically in the context of women. That's how they talk, and if you can't keep up you're just going to flounder and make false statements.
So yes, she actually is claiming they're both coverings, but you got so stuck on "foreign word bad!" that you're willing to deny historical truth to deny any similarities rather than focusing on the real cultural incompatibilities. Like being rapey pedophile warmongers. A belief in religious modesty is the benign sugar coating for the poison underneath, and you're just drawing more attention to the sugar.
A hijab in the non arabic sense isn’t just a barrier and covering. She said hijab instead of using the english words head dress or covering for a reason when the rest of her sentence is in plain english. The fact you want to claim otherwise is just disingenuous. Go suck muslim dick elsewhere
Is a nuns habit the same as a hijab. Yes or no
What is that retarded reductionism supposed to solve? No a modern nun's habit is not the same as a hijab and a habit is not the same as a 12th century wimple either l, so I don't know why you keep trying to change the subject like that.
A Benz is also not the same as a Ford, but you'd have to be dumb not to see they came from the same schools of thought and cross pollination of ideas. And actually retarded to claim they're not both still cars.
She is not claiming theyre both head coverings or clothes. She is implying theyre hijab alikes. Its amazing how far you will equivocate to try and miss that point the muslim is making
You are just trying to make it incredibly reductive to the point where like you said you want to claim theyre both cars or clothes in this case when theyre very different in terms of the usage and ideology behind the religions behind them
Hijab is literally just the Arabic word for barrier/covering.
She didn't say "a hijab" meaning the noun for a type of clothing. She said just said hijab, as in the very concept of covering, specifically in the context of women. That's how they talk, and if you can't keep up you're just going to flounder and make false statements.
So yes, she actually is claiming they're both coverings, but you got so stuck on "foreign word bad!" that you're willing to deny historical truth to deny any similarities rather than focusing on the real cultural incompatibilities. Like being rapey pedophile warmongers. A belief in religious modesty is the benign sugar coating for the poison underneath, and you're just drawing more attention to the sugar.
A hijab in the non arabic sense isn’t just a barrier and covering. She said hijab instead of using the english words head dress or covering for a reason when the rest of her sentence is in plain english. The fact you want to claim otherwise is just disingenuous. Go suck muslim dick elsewhere