You are the one going but achually when you know its not a hijab. You are a retard and an obnoxious one. You dont have to put up with my “shit talking” which is telling you you’re being an idiot by going but achually. You can just go fuck yourself
The wimple is basically just a renamed 12th century hijab, the Europeans saw it in the crusades and thought "These backwards heathens are savages, but their women not being so vain about their hair isn't such a bad idea." and brought the idea back where it proceeded to dominate European fashion for over a century.
You've said over and over again that they're not the same and I know it, without having the faintest clue what you're talking about. They are in fact the functionally very closely related and it's retarded that you're this attached to the idea they're not when you apparently know nothing about European history.
What is that retarded reductionism supposed to solve? No a modern nun's habit is not the same as a hijab and a habit is not the same as a 12th century wimple either l, so I don't know why you keep trying to change the subject like that.
A Benz is also not the same as a Ford, but you'd have to be dumb not to see they came from the same schools of thought and cross pollination of ideas. And actually retarded to claim they're not both still cars.
She is not claiming theyre both head coverings or clothes. She is implying theyre hijab alikes. Its amazing how far you will equivocate to try and miss that point the muslim is making
You are just trying to make it incredibly reductive to the point where like you said you want to claim theyre both cars or clothes in this case when theyre very different in terms of the usage and ideology behind the religions behind them
You are the one going but achually when you know its not a hijab. You are a retard and an obnoxious one. You dont have to put up with my “shit talking” which is telling you you’re being an idiot by going but achually. You can just go fuck yourself
The wimple is basically just a renamed 12th century hijab, the Europeans saw it in the crusades and thought "These backwards heathens are savages, but their women not being so vain about their hair isn't such a bad idea." and brought the idea back where it proceeded to dominate European fashion for over a century.
You've said over and over again that they're not the same and I know it, without having the faintest clue what you're talking about. They are in fact the functionally very closely related and it's retarded that you're this attached to the idea they're not when you apparently know nothing about European history.
Is a nuns habit the same as a hijab. Yes or no
What is that retarded reductionism supposed to solve? No a modern nun's habit is not the same as a hijab and a habit is not the same as a 12th century wimple either l, so I don't know why you keep trying to change the subject like that.
A Benz is also not the same as a Ford, but you'd have to be dumb not to see they came from the same schools of thought and cross pollination of ideas. And actually retarded to claim they're not both still cars.
She is not claiming theyre both head coverings or clothes. She is implying theyre hijab alikes. Its amazing how far you will equivocate to try and miss that point the muslim is making
You are just trying to make it incredibly reductive to the point where like you said you want to claim theyre both cars or clothes in this case when theyre very different in terms of the usage and ideology behind the religions behind them