On the other hand, with stuff like "the pink tax" it has been proven that women will waste money for something that looks a certain way, even if it serves no functional purpose.
If you get women to like Marvel, you can sell Marvel Razors and Marvel Cooch Shaving Cream at 10% over normal price.
I think I might have figured part of it out... she was made queen in the 1950s, which pretty definitively disproves the "everything was sexist back then" thing. They want to pretend that no queen could ever rule because sexist men run the world. But it is a lie and always has been. Elizabeth reminds them that they were never held back by sexism.
You are forgetting that they don't use the actual definition of diversity. Diversity to libtards means "not white people". If you have a show that is all black or all brown people and add a white person, you're "reducing diversity" rather than increasing it, in their terms.
Obviously that isn't what diversity means, but you can't expect English majors to be able to read.
http://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/21465.jpeg
Netflix isn't looking to change anything. It is using the loss of subscribers (caused by banning Russia) to increase efficiency of their operations. It couldn't ever lay these minorities off without an excuse, so they're using this to pit their customers against conservatives.
Not really, no.
First of all, the "diversity teams" were only needed to teach the "main team" to do "diverse" things. To that end, their mission is already complete.
Second, the "loss of subscribers" triggering these layoffs is because Netflix banned Russia over Ukraine. If you add the banned Russians back in, they netted positive subscriber growth.
Sidebar -- I don't know what cutting off the average joe in Russia from Netflix is supposed to do. How the fuck is some illiterate farmer going to go stop the KGB.
In conclusion... this was a "we did a thing (banned Russia) that gave us an excuse (subscriber losses) to fire people we otherwise couldn't fire (token minorities)." Just think: how else could they layoff these people? Now they can say "well go blame conservatives for getting your favorite writer fired" and motivate more violence from democrats.
I mean if Twitter has been losing money forever, they'll take his money and use it to start up a new one. And bring over all their bot/efamous posters to try to kill twitter.
And the new rebuilt one will probably have more banning and spying built in from the start.
Wait until you find out that the WW2 nazi stuff wasn't actually about "Jewish people", but rather was about "those evil bankers" who made Germany pay for WW1 (who it later turned out were Jewish).
You've be unable to differentiate Hitler and Bernie from a speech perspective.
Yeah I've seen a lot of "does this mean Putin and Trump were working together against the cabal / deep state" stuff.
No, Putin and Trump weren't working together. At all. On anything. Obama was working with Putin when he had "more flexibility after the election". Bush, Obama and Biden have each let Putin annex or invade a country.
Putin was terrified of Trump.
One of the things that seemed scrubbed very early on from the internet was the "average number of deaths per year" type data, which has seemingly since be replaced with "revised" data.
Early on when deaths were allegedly the highest, the data wasn't outpacing an average number of deaths per year for various illnesses.
In summary, I'd like to see an "average deaths per year" for the last 20 years by demographics.
Obama's efforts to prevent missile defense shields in Europe were to enable a war like this to happen.
I mean, saving money during mega-inflation due to Biden's attempts to destroy the economy is a super bad idea.
If anything, you should be taking out loans and buying real estate because it will be cheaper to repay after inflation.
That and if the economy collapses, you'd never have to repay the loans.
I'm sure it is less than 1%, but we don't have data to support any answer, really.
For example, the 0.89% unvaccinated hospitalization rate they claim in that article would include people who got sick and hospitalized before they knew COVID was a thing, and the vaccinated rate would not.
The most at risk elderly who died all would fall into the unvaccinated group, because that all happened before the vaccine was released.
Either way, to calculate the actual rate you'd need to know numbers for how many people caught it, and that's un-knowable.
I'd say "bad" Republicans are more likely to be good people trying their best who are dumb than intentionally evil like most Democrats.
And I don't see any problem with requiring immigrants to be vaccinated. Solves the problem in a few years that way.
I've seen a lot of different pics of that guy over the years. Was never sure if it was a photoshop or real. Always thought it looked like a younger body for the head.