Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

96
Climate Crisis (media.scored.co)
posted 62 days ago by redneonglow 62 days ago by redneonglow +96 / -0
41 comments share
41 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (41)
sorted by:
▲ 51 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 51 points 62 days ago +51 / -0

You left out the big one, they aren't interested in nuclear power, which is the real green power.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Megaboom2025 14 points 61 days ago +14 / -0

Nor do they ever mention weather modification or climate tech

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– undecidedmask2 6 points 61 days ago +6 / -0

I’ve never even thought of using those for “fighting climate change”. I guess if it was an actual threat that’s a way to solve it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SophiesBoyfriend 7 points 61 days ago +7 / -0

Planting trees is a simple way to capture carbon dioxide.

But it doesn’t come with enough communism

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ChippingToe 2 points 61 days ago +2 / -0

trees are too based for that

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– HugJugBox 5 points 61 days ago +5 / -0

I've seen blocking out the sun floated as an idea to "reduce climate change". I am surprised they jumped right to the "every evil villain ever" plan so quickly...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– realerfunction 4 points 61 days ago +4 / -0

no they do, just for evil

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 61 days ago +1 / -0

They're studying it, planning for it, even testing it! But shhh! Don't tell the sheep!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 3 points 61 days ago +3 / -0

Especially with Gen4 tech on the horizon that is far better and produces less waste material (and can even use waste material from older nuclear plants as fuel). The leftoids should be screaming at the govt to do whatever it takes to get that working. Instead it's all wind mills and solar that don't even offset the carbon required to produce and maintain it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– MEGAMAGAULTRA 34 points 62 days ago +34 / -0
  1. For some reason, saving the environment includes communism and a one world government, surveillance tools and total control
permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Prof_Chaos 14 points 61 days ago +14 / -0

... and everyone being destitute, dependent on pharmaceuticals and eating bug sandwiches.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– Kaarous 29 points 62 days ago +29 / -0

Environmentalism has never been anything other than just another tentacle of Marx.

You should conserve the beauty of nature around you, for yourself and your posterity. But that's not what they're asking. They're just peddling another petty excuse for tax slavery.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– KekistanPM 9 points 61 days ago +9 / -0

Often times environmentalists make things worse.

Don't clear that dry brush that can easily be used to fuel a major forest fire. Don't control the deer population, let them consume everything around them and later starve themselves and other species. Be sure to leave a lot of trash on the ground during those Earth Day rallies. Oopsie, the EPA accidentally destroyed another river by dumping chemicals into it! But that's okay, nobody will get in trouble for it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 5Cats 3 points 61 days ago +3 / -0

After the "Walk For Life" rallies or the Tea Party rallies of yesteryear? There wasn't a speck of litter left the next day. But ALL the leftist rallies? Mounds of garbage everywhere.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SendTomBoys 1 point 60 days ago +1 / -0

"don't clear that brush" literally the reason California is a frothing cauldron of burning hell half of the year, every year. Fucking retarded cunts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Bullseyed 4 points 61 days ago +4 / -0

I mean it was started by Teddy Roosevelt and definitely was conservative originally before being taken over by the subhuman parasites.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Kaarous 13 points 61 days ago +13 / -0

Arguably, such a thing would be better called conservation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– TotalTrannyDeath2 15 points 62 days ago +15 / -0

Missed one, never go after corporations that put off the most pollution and instead punish people on an individual level and use it to take away more of your rights. That's usually the argument I use to convince people that it's a scam, it works a lot more often than you think. Specifically mentioning the fact that the activists talk about and go after oil and fuel production and use but never those same companies (in a lot of cases) for plastic production.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 5Cats 3 points 61 days ago +3 / -0

The bird-choppers? They get an exemption for killing large numbers of bald eagles every year for a paltry $10K (iirc). You kill one? Jail time...

Never mind the rest of the carnage each one causes every day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– MartinRigggs 15 points 61 days ago +15 / -0

An even bigger giveaway is the fact that the U.S. government is actively building well over a thousand massive data centers by 2030, that will triple our energy usage as a nation on a yearly basis. This is the same government that was climate alarmist for the last 40+ years, and it isn’t just our government, same deal with just about every government on the planet, especially in the western world where they’ve all been screeching about manmade climate change for the better part of 30 years. That shit doesn’t add up unless the goal is nothing more than to switch us over to a global system where everyone receives X-amount of energy credits for food and travel, anything beyond that amount of credits is off limits to everyone except the jews and their oligarchs who are helping to put this system in place…..which is why so many governments are forcing their citizens into a digital ID system.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– 5Cats 5 points 61 days ago +5 / -0

That is a new twist! Those "data centers" are free to sprout up everywhere, sucking down HUGE amounts of electricity often generated by FF. Not a peep from the Alarmists!

At least some of them are trying to build nuclear power to run them, eh? SAY! Why don't the just build Wind& Solar? So much cheaper & stuff.
Because that a big lie and they know it! 😡 Every kWh of W&S must be backed up or it all falls apart. The only available backup is fossil fuels, so the data centers want nuclear.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MartinRigggs 2 points 61 days ago +2 / -0

Yeah they’re going to get those nuclear power plants too, and you’ll hear MSM back down on the fear porn with nuclear because they know it’s the only solution to run the data centers that will be the data storage for the entire social credit and carbon credit system, probably a key part of the system for their humanoid-robot soldiers to have access to also, for behavioral prediction and pre-crime purposes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Hematomato 12 points 62 days ago +12 / -0

Well, it means they're not remotely interested in solving the problem. That they'll never let a good crisis go to waste in the service of lining their pockets. That they pretty much know it's impossible to solve the problem, so they might as well use it as part of a power grab.

Doesn't mean the problem isn't real. It is. It's just that no government or coalition of government has either the will or the ability to stop it. And "guys, our great-grandchildren are probably good and fucked no matter what" isn't a message that polls well.

Liberals lie by saying they can solve it; conservatives lie by saying it isn't even real; every partisan is much more highly motivated to spread lies than face the truth.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 10 points 62 days ago +10 / -0

It's easy to solve the problem. Glowing green rocks can literally be found in abundance pretty much everywhere on Earth, and give off way more energy, and less radioactivity (fun fact), than coal when processed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– 5Cats 4 points 61 days ago +4 / -0

Correct! The material the "scrubbers" getting coal particles out of the chimneys is actually more radioactive than the average "nuclear waste" is.
Yet it sits in open retaining ponds & such.
"Nuclear waste" is 90% not radioactive at all. Clothing, paperwork, materials that never saw an isotope are stored as such. Even the actual "core materials" are mostly harmless after just 20 years. Dental x-ray materials.

That's the whole point! If something is highly radioactive? It has a short "half-life". It degenerates rapidly into non-harmful, less radioactive materials! Rapidly!

The exception is certain plutonium isotopes which have a long half-life (comparatively) BUT degenerate into REALLY nasty isotopes that fire radiation everywhere. Ok that shit is nasty! But it's what? 0.001% of waste? And is handled completely separately, for good reason!

But never in 1M years will an Alarmist listen to facts 😣

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– nikgtasa 5 points 61 days ago +5 / -0

After learning about weather manipulation, i'm not sure how real it is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 61 days ago +1 / -0

Weather manipulation is "not impossible"? But the scale of effort required? How could that be hidden? And globally? No not a chance. Local, short term maybe? But thousands of square miles for years? Nah bro, that's tinfoil hat stuff right there.

And I love me a good conspiracy theory! SO many have been prove true! From the Maine & Lusitania to the SPLC... we are correct more often than we are wrong 😉

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– nikgtasa 3 points 61 days ago +3 / -0

I'm no expert but if it was true it could be hidden in plain sight. Media won't talk about it, experts are all fake or scared to death and everything else is a conspiracy theory.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 61 days ago +1 / -0

Unless there's ways to knowingly change mid-term trends? Weeks, not days or months? With small alterations it would need a huge effort to rapidly change weather or to keep it un-natural for months at a time. Huge!
I think it might be possible to "guide the weather" and influence it slightly over that "medium" time period, but how and why I have no idea. To alter in the short term over a large area would need huge amounts of energy. In the long term the required effort would be gigantic because:

The system self-corrects, it has for millions of years. Unless large events, like super volcanos or comet strikes hit? Things follow a pretty narrow path.

It does, however, change over time. Measured in decades or centuries, millennia even. A "5 year trend" is a blip. That's what AGW is all about: pretending a natural warming trend after the end of the Little Ice Age (1700 - 1850, give or take) is human-made AND natural short warming spells are also 100% human caused.
Notice how cooling spells are utterly ignored by Alarmists, eh? If forced to see them, they too are caused by humans :/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Knight_Of_Saint_John 10 points 61 days ago +10 / -0

Its all very jewish

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– ActiveLurker 9 points 61 days ago +9 / -0

I think the biggest one is often not even mentioned: BP literally coined "carbon footprint" explicitly to offload any moral culpability onto the populace away from the oil companies.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Vaako23 6 points 61 days ago +6 / -0

I have also heard the Udssr also did support the greens in germany to make them more reliant on oil/gas from russia. Thats why they were always against nuclear.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nikgtasa 2 points 61 days ago +2 / -0

Yeah, heard that too and i think it tracks. eu still gets a lot of gas from the ebil russia.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– 5Cats 5 points 61 days ago +5 / -0
  1. They NEVER criticize China or even India. They go on and on about China's minuscule "green energy" while coal increases its % every year.

  2. They HATE nuclear energy. The cleanest, endless source of electricity know to humanity. Renewable? It's infinite. But they fight it tooth and nail.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BigMark 4 points 61 days ago +4 / -0

6: Climate Science is complete garbage according to normal scientists :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDsjeKo3u3o

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– dontdrinksoy 4 points 61 days ago +4 / -0

Guys, any non-retard knows it's a scam. Just ask yourself: WTF are fossil fuels made from? Plants. Therefore, Earth can sequester any, and all of its carbon. It has the ability to do so. But above all, carbon is required for life. Too much in one spot is bad, yeah, but in general it's good for the planet.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 61 days ago +1 / -0

There's several ways to make oil aside from drilling it, but the costs are high.
There's also VAST undiscovered fields of oil in hard-to-get-to place like the deep oceans. If the price is high enough? Those will be used some day too!

When they talk about "running out of oil" they mean "sweet light crude" which is easy to drill & easy to refine. The cheap stuff! That's just a fraction of the "proven reserves" globally.

If the atmospheric CO2 falls below (iirc) 180ppm? All life on Earth ends. The best times life had in the past? CO2 was well over 1000ppm. It's at what? 430ppm now? Warmer is ALWAYS better than colder. No exceptions. & other inconveniet facts! 😹

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Delroy 3 points 61 days ago +3 / -0

All these are true but it can still be real. Well maybe not the "crisis" part. But the part where all our Co2 emissions are changing the climate. I mean, look around you. Look how many humans and houses and industrial sites there are. The whole earth looks like this. Do you really think it has no effect?

Of course it's also true that we are the carbon the rich wants to reduce.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SophiesBoyfriend 3 points 61 days ago +3 / -0

Somewhat Related that I came across today :

Man manipulated a weather market using a hair dryer…

https://x.com/aaronjmars/status/2047017251270734309

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– current_horror 2 points 61 days ago +2 / -0

1, 2, and 3 are actually retard takes on par with blacks refusing to understand per capita. Obviously the entire population of the West consumes exponentially more resources and generates exponentially more waste than the 0.01% of elite "hypocrites". They're shitty people,to be sure, but their selfishness doesn't signal irrationality in this instance.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 61 days ago +1 / -0

No. They DEMAND that YOU live a "low carbon life" but THEY refuse to? They should lead by example, not by threat of force. Ok? Practice what you preach? Do unto others? Ok?
Add to that their refusal to require the #1 "emitter" on the planet, China, to live by the same rules they demand of you? It's all a scam.

Do you know what China's "Paris Pledge" is? To double their emissions by 2030. In accordance with the "Obama Agreement" allowing them to do so. Not reduce, double. This is fine with the Alarmists! India? They'll reduce after they get 1 trillion in funding. Until then? It's coal baby coal! Not a peep from the Alarmists. Pure hypocrisy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 62 days ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy