Do It For Her
(twitter.com)
Comments (114)
sorted by:
Well, welcome to the dream woman of the Brit Gen Z. Now if only Elon could make a robot, preferably at catgirl one, with an artifical womb and put this personality in...
It is always going to be funny the feminist, virtue signalling, native hating establishment accidentally created the best girl currently of 2026 in their propaganda game.
Hating so hard they went full circle and created something nice. Reminds me of original bronies from 4chan who tried to use kindness as sacrasm for trolling but autists took it as sincerity.
Finest gentlemen 😂
I call this the Alan Moore Effect. If a writer's personal morality is sufficiently inverted, then he may - unintentionally and ignorantly - invert the heroes and villains in his stories.
The best example of this effect in action is the character Rorschach from Watchmen. Moore intended for him to be an evil caricature of conservatism, but he ended up being a fan favorite and maybe the only character in the book with a defensible morality. That's the sort of self-own that happens when your worldview is completely detached from reality.
I can think of few more instances when it does happen. Beastie Boys - Fight for your Right was supposed to be a parody of frats but it turned out to be an awesome song and they ended up being celebrity frats anyway.
Another one was New Guy in Mallorie Jessica Udischas (sweetbeans99) where the New Guy was supposed to be a concern troll but turns out people like him more than the main heroine who celebrated Pewdiepie getting robbed.
It's hilarious really. It's like Dunning Krugger of Extremism.
The Fry Cry 5 OST was supposedly satirical, but it didn't stop the same 2A Bible-thumping rednecks Ubisoft was lampooning from liking it unironically.
To think I thought the character was trans because of the choker.
They've ruined chokers for me forever.
Ah, remember the early 2000s when chokers were only an expression of submissive women not mentally ill women?
tramp stamps, thongs, and multiple bracelets on each arm
and eyebrow piercings which look terrible on everybody. the tragus was popular, too. And tongue rings... for... reasons...
The primary reason was to walk around and incessantly clack it against your teeth, making it difficult for anyone to take you seriously. Anything beyond that was just a rumor.
You wanna know how I know that you never had a chick with a ball bearing bolted through her tongue throat you?
Naw I knew plenty of girls who did it because of promiscuity. I'm glad my gf got her nipples done. Those things felt great grazing across my chest. Her friend swallowed her tongue rung after not securing it well enough when she put it back in after visiting her parents.
Ehhh, there's a LOT of overlap. Even the trannisary guard are largely bottoms.
I thought they just wore chokers in an attempt to hide their Adam's apple?
That's pretty much it for trannies. For the sub women it was more to show them owned by either imagining them having their masters name on it or attached to a leash.
Why do I say this? I've SEEN women's 'romance' books, holy crap are they submissive freaks......if you remove the feminism it would be in a fun way though..
I feel like a lot of this nonsense is us men's fault, women are naturally submissive, the fact that they're leading us to our ruin is only because we're too pussyfied to take charge of them
Both world wars lowered the stock of strong dominant men in the West, as well as the later infiltration of commies in education and media depicting a strong hand as a bad thing.
And you can roughly split those into two groups. The submissive bottoms and Gad Saad's sneaky fuckers trying to be a "lesbian" with a free strap-on. The former is the larger group by a long way, the latter and fringe cases are the majority of issues. They're all mentally ill, but I do have some sympathy for the former. How many are on that path because women don't create enough quality tops for them? If anything the current social dynamics have flooded their field with shitty fake tops.
There's even a horrible phrase I've heard from the BDSM community, 'false doms'
They are sadist who pretend to be doms to hurt genuine subs for just their own pleasure, not caring of the sub or the mental issues that could cause.
It's strikingly similar to trannies that try to trick straight guys.
That could easily just describe regular abusive Doms who have no idea wtf they are doing because they are probably using 50 Shades as an instruction manual.
Yeah, when the entire culture became more overt it was nothing more than an increase in potential victims for them across many more isolated groups. So they can do what they do and change circles more easily.
They need to be strung up by their intestines.
"False doms" are, generally speaking, still dominant. They're just abusive. So the name really is some mollycoddling of language. A "real" false dom would be a switch or a full service bottom who through happenchance managed to get into a longterm relationship with someone more submissive than themselves that they're trying to satisfy by acting dominant for them, but don't actually wish to be the dominant party all the time.
Language matters, and even in niche fetish conduct, they STILL attempt to subvert it. Oh, they're not abusive, there's no need to report them, they're just a false dom, it's an identity crisis, not an abuse case!
You don't get much more democratic than public opinion being presented as art expression.
Sure some will say "It's AI" but they'll be using characters from the Latin alphabet to do so, the same characters that make up the law and all the reading celebrated this year in the UK.
And so they won't be against how the idea is presented, just that the idea exists.
I think it's time Amelia hooks up with Vivian James and the establishment reconsiders picking on us 14 basement dwellers with sock accounts.
Got to say, Amelia on the throne at the end warmed my cockles :)
AI is not art.
Neither is paint.
I’d say making an effort to create a picture with paint is far more worthy of being called art than entering a prompt into a computer for an image output.
Trolling is a art
A seasoned curator of cultural artefacts are we?
I'd say that was the last sentence uttered that made sense on the Internet, before the dark times, before the iPhone.
That's definitely more of an art than AI
And someone with training using horse hair brushes, rabbit fat glue, okra oil paints and seal skin canvases would say that a kid with some shit and a wall to draw on is beneath their level of competance.
But someone once painted the walls of caves with their chewed up food, and without them we wouldn't have the Sistine Chapel ceiling today.
Art is any expression, and refining it is what brings elegance and sophistication.
Today's most perfect music will be as wild as a primal scream when given enough time.
It's the message being inferred with AI, the onlooker becomes part of the piece.
Art is a combination of idea and execution. If one of these is sufficiently brilliant, it may compensate for the other.
AI is, for the most part, a type of execution. If you find yourself enjoying a particular AI creation, it is probably because the ideas behind it are extra smart - smart enough to qualify as art.
Agreed.
Some people would dismiss Piet Mondrian, Joan Miro or Henri Matisse as fumbling finger painters with limited colours at their disposal.
And they'd be right.
But for those who can see beyond the simple and into the purpose for it being simple. There's an elegance they each capture so vividly, and uniquely, that transcends many of their works to the sublime.
Lots of AI work will be finger paintings by comparison to their human artists' efforts. But an artist who uses AI well will bring forth something which evokes something in those who perceive it, and that is a special magic which isn't always available to everyone.
Toulouse-Lautrec made his money advertising bars, but that's not the only thing people associate with his works. Perhaps some AI artists will gain fame for their use in bringing about a new medium to the schools of art ;)
Sure! I'd disagree with them though. There will always be pretentious artists out there.
But a prompt fed into a computer with AI characters and voices churned out is not "art expression." It's beneath painting caves with chewed up food, because that actually takes effort, time, courage, emotion.
Letting a computer do the work for you after you show it content that other people made? Nah.
Fucken lol.
Anyone who takes this...ahem..."piece" seriously is retarded.
Have you looked at the world recently?
Yup! Thankfully, it seems most normal people who aren't terminally online would see this and make fun of it. There are certainly corners of the internet (like here, facebook, twitter etc) where people might see this sort of AI slop and write something like "AMEN" or whatever because they don't know any better
But regular people? What do you think they'll get out AI generated images? It's literal slop.
Do you actually have people in your life that you think would genuinely be moved by this?
Whatever artists make is not art either.
What constitutes art in your eyes?
Did you just claim that the definition of art is subjective?
In many respects it is. I did certainly imply it’s subjectivity when a user remarked elsewhere in the thread seal canvases v children scribbling on walls. To the hypothetical person, they don’t see the latter as art. I, personally, would, because art is inherently expression through a medium. Granted, to different degrees, I don’t find them equal art, but art nonetheless.
I don’t think, in the context of the parent thread, that AI slop is at all in line at all with art through activism/expression. It’s lines fed into a machine, that the user did not make, and the machine pores over data that the user did not log, and uses existing art that the user did not create, and outputs a video based on prompts that the user barely lifted a finger for.
It’s not expression. It’s data output.
What I just did in respect to the comment you replied to was ask a question to a different user, so I don’t really understand the context of your question.
Despite your use of the qualifier "personally," you just gave an objective definition. Your qualifier only applies to your application of that definition.
Data output is a form of expression. I'm not telling you that AI art is amazing or equally meritorious, but in many cases it is a form of basic art.
What is being expressed by the user? There is no emotion behind the prompt, no apparent goal, no motive. Simple request and output.
There is no expression.
By your strange definition, driving is not travel because somebody else built your car.
...lol what?
We're talking about art, not travel. Those aren't the same things. I don't even understand how you get to that line of thinking. I can't begin to find any connection between how a person making art is in any way related to a person driving a car to get from A to B.
There's no transitive property required in defining art vs defining travel. They are two very different things.
I love how AI gets intellectual frauds to so willingly expose themselves.
Fucken lol
Agreed, this is way better than a banana taped to the wall or a jar of piss with a crucifix in it.
By a small margin. It's down at the bottom of the barrel for sure.
Using a woman for your political enemy is a bad idea. The art style makes her unattractive but she isn’t specifically fat and lacks tattoos and bits of metal. Easily making her attractive once a good art style is used. This was such a shit idea it feels like it was done on purpose.
Much simpler. It was done by overpampered middle age white women.
"Hey chuds, this pretty girl is saying wrongthink! You don't want to associate with her and ruin your life in the longhouse, do you?"
IRL girls are going to start emulating her
(>.>)
(<.<)
Oh no, how terrible.
First reboots of every sitcom, then JNCO jeans and now right wing alt girls. The 90s are back!
The best part is complying with the state's demands leaves you alone and friendless. Weird play considering the left's fetishizing of criminals.
Alegria leaves so much to be desired as an “art” style that you can basically twist anything they create into something objectively beautiful and co-opt it for yourself. It’s neat.
Needs more racial slurs.
a lot more
You know its an AI if a woman political takes these days make sense.
If they wanted to make men hate the character, all the creators had to do was make Amelia in their own image: a morbidly obese, stained stretched yoga pants, buzzcut on the sides, gauges, tindr on her phone nearby, trans with a massive adam's apple, feminist. Have xim try to convince Charlie that xam's really a woman. Also, shim's jewish. Really, REALLY jewish. And just did porn with several black men simultaneously a few hours prior. Shim hasn't taken a shower in days and has no clue what exercise is. Also, shim's drunk, on twenty different pills, and on xir period. Don't ask.
Why did they have to give her purple hair?
Fuck it, we're reclaiming the colour haired girls, bring back the goths, punks and emos! 😂
Every far right millennial man longs for based goth girls
Ladette culture was prime time for freedoms. Girls drinking pinks, coloured hair was a kink (Not a preliminary warning), chokers were hip and sex was liberating.
But, it seems "Girl power" won out in the end. Only that battle though, the war is eternal.
Reject hair dyes, return to redheads 🔥
"Look what they have to do to mimic a fraction of our power."
Even redheads top up their colouring a little ;)
I may or may not be more focused on how natural the carpet looks rather than the drapes 🔥
I'm a redhead who dyed his hair in the late 90s/early 2000s
I had blue, purple, safety orang, striped hair in the late 90s/early 2000s and still have my several facial piercings.
This is very "conservative" to what IRL Amelia is thinking
i say conservative because i'm certain some jew thought of the prompt "we defeated the NOTSEES!" to been in positive light
🤭
Would
Did AI make her skirt so short unprompted?
He said the prompt was based on a collective of memes, you can imagine this is tame version.
That escalated quickly
The Amelia memes are glorious.
AI Slop
This is one scenario I disagree. This is the Bitcoin of AI. Created to spit in the face of controlling entities.
AI isn't taken seriously enough to spit in the face of anything. If you come to "controlling entities" with something like this you just get laughed at.
"Do it for her"? She doesn't exist. It's just the same sort of political memes, only now she moves and has a voice.
"People don't rally behind fictional characters" - guy in a Gamergate sub
Hilarious that this keeps happening
He's not complaining about this because it's AI, he's complaining because it goes against his leftist ideology. He always does this routine where he plays dumb and says stuff like "why do you guys even care about this", "y'all are overreacting", "can't believe this stuff triggers you guys lol". He also has an alt account he uses named ceva.
Britania and Uncle Sam have entered the chat...
Now I want Amelia/Vivian yuri. Damn you.
Who?
I feel like that's a fair interpretation of
Why? I'm speaking about one person. I'm talking about this image output in this context.
I made no stance about what people do in other contexts.
So, your interpretation isn't hitting here today unfortunately.
This guy was never going to have the resources or ability to hand-craft this message on his own. So without this tool, AI, he was just not going to put anything like this forward. Maybe he'd make a tweet, but that's as far as it would've gone.
The content is good--it looks good, sounds good, and the message it conveys is utterly needed right now.
Would you prefer that instead of this, he would've/could've done nothing? That's the result of your objection. You're not objecting to the content, you're griping about the process. Well, the options were use these tools, or do nothing. Personally I'm cool with this message being able to be produced, no matter what tools were used to do it.
You're making a case for laziness.
Why do you doubt his ability so quickly? You think he'd never be able to have the ability to learn a skill?
AI slop is disregarded quickly. It's seen as low effort, and treated as such.
I'd prefer that we have tools in a society to help people learn and hone skills, and not just prompt and AI to do all the dirty work for them.
The content is also shit. It's soulless, it's rehashed old memes, and it feels like a caricature, like AI only learned about england through Mr Bean. "Shakespeare and Dickens, Harry Potter." I mean come on. It's a joke.
If you truly, genuinely think the only option is to use AI to animate existing memes, or nothing...holy shit I pity your life.
It's not "laziness," it's putting creative tools in the hands of people who don't have any other options.
Think this through. Either everyone with something important to say has to develop the artistic and technical skill to put out hand-crafted work of this sort (ahead of time, just in case they're going to end up using it) or they have to hire people who have these skills and rely on them to make the content according to given designs.
Do you understand how slow and complicated and prohibitive in every way this is? This is why I said that without this "lazy" solution, the content would simply not exist.
Your version of how things should be is simply not tenable, not if you want good messaging to prevail. You're advocating hand-cuffing non-"creatives" by arbitrarily withholding technical tools from them that historically have been hoarded by "creatives," who are overwhelmingly metropolitan liberal elites.
This isn't about what the "only" option is, it's about what options are available to people to make themselves heard, at what cost. You are calling for completely arbitrary stagnation, and your tactic for achieving this is scolding.
LOL. Fuck you! Fuck your scolding, stupid pissy dinosaur. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle, so take your scolding prefect ass and sit in on a barbed pole sideways.
Yes. Welcome to learning and honing a skill. Sorry if you think that it's prohibitive to start from the beginning.
Sorry...what tools have been hoarded by creatives that you feel non-creatives didn't have access to? Do you think pens and paper were hoarded by creatives?
Yeah, I'm gonna look down my nose at retards who use AI and pretend that it's somehow powerful or meaningful. Sue me. Seethe more, boomer.
LOL as if I'm the one here seething, you ridiculous fruit. Okay, fine, go ahead, look down your nose. It's not a very handsome nose, nobody cares, and I was just trying to stop you from embarrassing yourself further. But you're determined.
Ok pal
Even if someone had the ability, they would not be able to produce an equivalent output as quickly. The meme's influence would be greatly diminished by the time the it was being viewed by others.
The objective isn't to make "art," it's to spread the ideas and striking while the iron is hot works. If this makes one Brit go, "that's a good point," I don't care if it was done with pencil, paint, or AI. If you're getting stuck on if a transitory political meme demonstrates artistry or is low-effort, you've really lost the plot.
Yes. Welcome to putting time and effort into things you do.
The meme's influence is already greatly diminished by being AI slop. Do you think normie brits are going to see this and say "that's a good point"? How little do you think of people lol
Normies can't even identify AI lol
...you think this could be mistaken as real? Are you retarded?
Have you seen Britain? I think very little of them at the moment. What's you're argument here? "It doesn't matter?" Then it doesn't matter how it was made.
But you're totally right. He could have filmed all that on location, hiring actors, at quite a bit of expense, and release it just in time for it to possibly have been a dead meme. That sure would have been a better option.
I'm always surprised when someone on this site, of all places, understands the online media landscape so poorly.
Yes, I have.
Most of them would laugh at this.
It's the cream of the slop.
I don't like wine, but I can still tell if it's a good vintage or gone vinegary.
AI slop is all bottom shelf vinegar.
"How did we get from Churchill to you?" - It's Churchill's fault. Bad bot.
AR Belle Daphine
I'd buy her CLC water
And the left created her...brilliant...
"the surprising result."
If you're surprised by this then you are retarded.
Wow.. you got a computer /program/.. that's designed to tell you want you seem to want to hear.. to tell you.. no shit, surprising result everyone, exactly what you wanted to hear.
These tools are designed to pervert you. Plus there's now a log of everything you did to create this. You've given your mind to a corporation in exchange for a shiny bauble that's not worth anything and who's shine will not last a day. The dumbest trade in the history of humanity.
Fucking "ai" slop retards trying to out mainstream media the mainstream media. Get fucked. Do original shit... that would actually be a surprise.
This is some gay shit