Do It For Her
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
Ehhh, there's a LOT of overlap. Even the trannisary guard are largely bottoms.
I thought they just wore chokers in an attempt to hide their Adam's apple?
That's pretty much it for trannies. For the sub women it was more to show them owned by either imagining them having their masters name on it or attached to a leash.
Why do I say this? I've SEEN women's 'romance' books, holy crap are they submissive freaks......if you remove the feminism it would be in a fun way though..
I feel like a lot of this nonsense is us men's fault, women are naturally submissive, the fact that they're leading us to our ruin is only because we're too pussyfied to take charge of them
Both world wars lowered the stock of strong dominant men in the West, as well as the later infiltration of commies in education and media depicting a strong hand as a bad thing.
And you can roughly split those into two groups. The submissive bottoms and Gad Saad's sneaky fuckers trying to be a "lesbian" with a free strap-on. The former is the larger group by a long way, the latter and fringe cases are the majority of issues. They're all mentally ill, but I do have some sympathy for the former. How many are on that path because women don't create enough quality tops for them? If anything the current social dynamics have flooded their field with shitty fake tops.
There's even a horrible phrase I've heard from the BDSM community, 'false doms'
They are sadist who pretend to be doms to hurt genuine subs for just their own pleasure, not caring of the sub or the mental issues that could cause.
It's strikingly similar to trannies that try to trick straight guys.
That could easily just describe regular abusive Doms who have no idea wtf they are doing because they are probably using 50 Shades as an instruction manual.
Yeah, when the entire culture became more overt it was nothing more than an increase in potential victims for them across many more isolated groups. So they can do what they do and change circles more easily.
They need to be strung up by their intestines.
"False doms" are, generally speaking, still dominant. They're just abusive. So the name really is some mollycoddling of language. A "real" false dom would be a switch or a full service bottom who through happenchance managed to get into a longterm relationship with someone more submissive than themselves that they're trying to satisfy by acting dominant for them, but don't actually wish to be the dominant party all the time.
Language matters, and even in niche fetish conduct, they STILL attempt to subvert it. Oh, they're not abusive, there's no need to report them, they're just a false dom, it's an identity crisis, not an abuse case!