I'd estimate that of the 8 hours they spend in the office, maybe 90 minutes of that time is spent on actual working.
I mean, honestly, same. Why put a full 8 hours of my day into a corporation that couldn't care less about me?
LeGaL cOnCePt
lol what the fuck are you talking about? The "common lore" (not what that means, btw) is contradicted literally every single fight of every single game. That alone should tell you that the whole "men are better fighters" trope is long out the window.
I was giving a hypothetical as an example my sweet illiterate child, not to say anything is right or wrong. There is no magic difference between women and men according to the lore, no. You still seem to be basing the supposed allowed ratio on the logic of the world you live in currently, instead of the fictional MK universe with magic.
Is there anything in the lore that says men should have a higher ratio of fighters in the tournament? No.
Get your hearing checked then I guess.
The battles aren't solely physical. There's also factors of agility, pain tolerance, weaponry, and, yes magic. So there could theoretically be a 1:1 ratio because this is a magic world with teleporters and wormholes and alternate dimensions that make only biological strength all but irrelevant.
There's no reason why there shouldn't be a 1:1 ratio. Theoretically it could be all women if they were the only ones with magic. It's splitting hairs over a game that has shapeshifting monsters and demigods that can control sand.
She's over 10,000 years old and can teleport. Not all fighters have magic, but she certainly does. Magic may not always trump everything else, but it clearly does in some fights.
Without magic there should be zero women in any real championship.
Cool. Not really relevant here, because in this world, there is magic. There are superhuman beings with overwhelming ability, strength, and pain tolerance. Some of them are women, and have powers that can defeat even the strongest fighters. It's why even if you pick Baraka, a massive mutant with blades coming out of his forearms, you still might lose to Cassie Cage, a normal human that can create forcefields.
You seem to be saying that you don't mind certain speech being an acceptable point for violence to be done against the sayer.
Not what I would say no. But I do know that some speech is meant to be instigating. If a guy comes in insulting people, he's potentially gonna catch some guy in the wrong mood. Is it acceptable? I wouldn't necessarily say so, but like I said earlier: don't start shit, won't be shit.
I'm still curious as to an example of somewhere the line might be moved to and I wouldn't be allowed constitutional freedoms. You think blasphemy laws might be on the table?
It’s not really censoring though. That would imply that I would be saying it otherwise, and I don’t really think I would.
Yeah that guy who tried to take your wallet started shit, and he got shit. Same idea.
Just like Chud started shit, and he subsequently got shit.
Cool, so you get it.
You have the ways you slack off, other people have theirs.