Isnt it funny how these types of anti natalist and anti family articles always show Whites?
(media.communities.win)
Comments (87)
sorted by:
whenever you see "expert" mentally replace it with "I made this shit up"
I prefer "Women are happier without children or a spouse, says
happiness expertchildless, single woman".I know the scientist is named Paul, but in that case, maybe that's just his personal preference in women.
Lol. Yea I came to that conclusion as well
"a leading expert in happiness". What retard reads that and believes it.
Science! Is now a joke. I left the hospital field when they decided to treat every patient equally despite their actions. At least in research I can dictate the harsh truths of biology, who knows how long that will last.
Those women don't look happy. They look like a commercial for Xanax and cheap red wine.
I'm skeptical that the one on the right is a woman at all.
I mean, she’s in a photo with Lena fucking Dunham…
It’s not hard to look more “feminine” than a blob, lol…
Kind of funny that none of us originally noticed that this is the cast of Girls, and not a bunch of random (unattractive) women…
Kind of funny as well that for a show called girls they were so ugly we were questioning if they were actual girls
Second from the right is the most dubious, in that regard, I would have thought…
But nah, I think they’re just… Below average, if nothing else.
I’ve never really liked tatts and undercuts, particularly on women, though, so maybe that’s just me, lol…
I would have said the one on the left if I didn't know who it was already. The one on the right just has a big jaw.
It looks like an ad for some new Sex in the City trash.
I have no doubt that women in their 20s and 30s think they are happier living a hedonist lifestyle that focuses entirely on themselves.
But we don’t die at 40. Spending the second half of your life with no family to love and care for you is a brand of hell on earth.
Of course, most white peoples have been engineered to abandon extended family to chase a job or a lifestyle, so a lot of us don’t even know what we’ve lost. If your kid is just gonna piss off to one of the coasts after college, showing up mostly just for weddings and funerals until the day they stash you in a home and sell your house, then yeah, why bother.
Correct. The spell of hedonism wears off around 35yo for women because that's when they hit the wall. Some can keep it going longer but truthfully, single women will only be happy so long as their beauty is relevant and even then their "happiness" is nothing more than a distraction.
This is a very good point. In some studies I read recently, it was found that young women (and men) with children scored lower on happiness indicators than those without, but as they got older and their children became adults, their happiness increased significantly while the childless people’s happiness decreased significantly.
Basically, children are a lot of trouble in the short term but give you much more fulfillment in the long term.
Already in their 30s they panic. I know several cases of friends that hit 30/ 35 and then got married and had a kid. One of them was a higher up at a bank, made a lot of money and now wants to give it all up to focus on her kid because her kid makes her happier then her job, it does help that her husband makes a lot of money. 2 others had a kid by "accident", as in straight out lied about being on the pill. Mid 30s those very happy women hit a big fucking reality wall.
Not having kids is my biggest regret in life. It is crushing me.
How heavily medicated are they? Looking at "happiness" studies, you'll often see some groups that rate highly are also among the biggest consumers of anti-depressants.
I assume they're also lying, because anti-depressants don't make you happy. They make you just motivated enough to get out of bed, and occasionally twitch and tic, or so the adverts would have me believe.
Some people equate absence of all affect as "happiness" instead of a dull gray neutrality where nothing registers emotionally.
Picture of Lena Dunham and "Whites." Okay.
Well yeah, they want to replace the 'successful' whites who are too hard to fully control without requiring constant demonisation and degradation with 'easier to control' 'POCs'.
Not realising that the only reason why they were easier to control was because things were good, now that you are ridding the system of those that created, maintained and upgraded it, they aren't going to take up the slack, they'll just take whatever they can no matter who gets hurt.
Meanwhile the whites (and probably Asians too) not indoctrinated to end their own family lines will nope out of the system, live more rurally and watch as the cities dissolve into hellpits.
I do think it might be true for many women in their 20's. But like many things in life, not living for immediate happiness and looking to the future is the better plan.
Heroin probably feels good now, but it's a bad idea long-term. Or intermediate-term.
That's because white women are some of the biggest advocates for this shit.
"""""White women"""" https://archive.ph/wEu6D
Keep pretending that your precious white wamen aren't the ones calling 911 for breathing in a menacing manner at them.
Happiness is bullshit anyway. Happiness is what an addict is chasing.
Meaning is the only thing that leads to fulfillment. Fulfillment justifies suffering; you can live your life and wait for happiness to come to you rather than constantly chasing it with self-indulgent and, ultimately, self-destructive behaviour.
If you heard me talking to other parents about our kids you would think having kids is a pain but it is the most fulfilling thing I've done in my life.
Literal meme.
Capitalizing 'white' is stupid though.
Only anti Whites dont capitalize White .
It makes you look as stupid as the MSM.
MSM never capitalizes White.
Not never, but almost all do capitalize black.
Capitalizing races is retarded.
It's black, and it's white.
Nope. If you expect me to capitalize Jew then i'll also capitalize White.
Pro tip: I don't care if you capitalize "Jew".
Do you also capitalize black? Then you're as retarded as the MSM.
But you seem to care if i capitalize White? and i dont care if i do or dont capitalize others, i do it how i feel like it but im going to capitalize White no matter what.
Karen: "I don't feel happy."
Carin: "Don't be ridiculous, the experts say you are the happiest subgroup."
Karen: "Okay, I guess I'm happy."
Happiness expert?
Those are at least 1/2 (((whites))) but point taken
That's a funny way of saying "coke addict"...
"happiness expert"
LOL
The anti-human Powers laugh as our daughters think dying without ever sharing in creation, is "happiness"...
Putting Lena Dunham in a pic with the word "happiness" associated with it is just base level trolling
False
Isn't that the cast of Girls? Looks like "fellow white" Lena Dunham, no?
ECKSPERT
"Happiness expert". I'm going to use that as my new title, as I shout at someone for 30minutes because they didn't get my order right.
How does one become a “happiness expert”
I don't think its funny at all
Maybe you should write for the Guardian since you seem to have the same end goal as them.
You do realize that extinction of the human race necessarily includes all men dying off, right?
You know only women give birth to men right? We haven't mastered asexual reproduction.
Not for a lack of vigorous trying among a certain subgroup, if Monkeypox statistics are taken into consideration. /s
So what will be the state 50 years from now of a country that follows your prescriptions ?
OK, so extinction. That is your plan? So as the Impy-'civilizations' will disappear, the future belongs to pro-natalist countries. Great job, genius.
While Imp's views are extreme, he does have a point - a lot of problems in society are due to simps and cucks who can't say 'no' to women because they worship women. The view you're promoting is not effectively any different - "we can't say 'no' to women because that will mean there are no more babies!".
The reality, of course, is that women, in general, have at least as much of a drive to have babies as men do. Men need to be willing to stand up and say 'no' when the deal is bad, because that's the only way to make women offer a different deal. Yet your view promotes the opposite, all the while we have articles like the OP telling women that "they don't need to have children or get married". What this leads to is (1) women being willing to say 'no' to men (even if they would be better off not saying 'no') (2) men not being willing to say 'no' to women (even if they would be better off saying 'no') and (3) a shit show when men are treated terribly, women are treated like angels, and society collapses because all the children are raised in broken families.
The problem is failure to understand that women don't actually have agency.
They don't whore around and abandon families because they want to, they do it because they've been told to, and don't have the ability to resist.
Women who "make good choices" all have positive influences telling them to make those choices. If they don't, they listen to the TV, magazines, influencers, etc.
You can blame women all you want, but the reality is that men tolerated feminism, which ultimately posits that women can "choose for themselves". Everything else follows from there.
You dont want to end up like Korea either .Korea has both extreme feminist and very strong men's right activist groups and both groups shunning the opposite sex to the point that they have the lowest birth rate in the world now.
You have issues. I never accepted your retarded frame. I just pointed out that even you accepted that your ideas would result in extinction.
We have over a century of them riding their raw hedonism into levels of depression and suffering our ancestors couldn't even fathom, and millennia of literature showing that none of that is new.
What kind of retard thinks women won't sink with the short term pleasure ship before they ever admit to being wrong or sacrifice anything?
Imagine listening to women's words instead of literally observing them and making your conclusions based on that.
You don't need to be depressed to be hurtling towards a horrific end through your own terrible idiocy.
Exactly, any more than a computer program is.
If they are told to act decently, they will. If the sum influence of their perception of "society" and their peer group says otherwise, they will act monstrously. You can see this in how eating disorders, Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, and many other mental illnesses manifest in women; it transmits through their peer group in a way that doesn't have a parallel in men. I think this is because they are actually unable to make their own decisions, and expecting them to is actually quite cruel.
I can't think of a single example of a woman who contradicts this. Even a contrarian woman like Rosa Parks was backed by an organized civil rights group. OTOH, there are many examples, both personally and historically, of men going against societal consensus and being eventually validated.
For many women, their positive influence is a father or husband. Single women tend to behave badly because they have no conscience, and no external force (like a religious group) keeping them in line. Then they create social circles full of other women which creates a feedback loop.
I'm not saying this to defend or excuse their actions, but to point out the meaninglessness of the idea of them "choosing" to preserve the species.
The famous examples of women who did things that society feels are important enough to write their feats into the historical record would - for women - probably more likely be those who did something with the help of a support network that encouraged them. Maybe a better example is women who just didn't fit their sex stereotype at the time, like Mary Shelley. I know women who don't exhibit that hivemind lunacy you speak of, but it's because they act more like men and don't have many female friends in the first place.
Still even if there are outliers that don't fit the mold, it doesn't mean we shouldn't base social norms on what's best for the majority. Western culture has a problem of allowing small minorities to have undue voice and influence.
Unfathomably based.
Then it's settled.