1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. Debate works more as a learning tool than as a means of persuasion, especially in the case of an intractable opposition. There is no longer any compromise possible between the left and everyone else.

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I prefer "neo-Marxist" to "Communist." It's more specific and has less historical baggage.

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have to recognize the words the empire ideology is using to trigger its brainwashed cult members, and either avoid them or subvert them. Otherwise you come off as just another NPC, and modifying it just makes you sound like you're maybe slightly less of an idiot but you're still a fucking idiot.

Goddamned right. Avoid, subvert, and rationally criticize leftist language at all times. Never adopt their terminology, even if doing so would be easier or more convenient; never use it except as a target for criticism.

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why, at all times, you have to avoid all euphemisms and never, ever use exclusively leftist language to discuss their totalitarian project. Use leftisms only when criticizing them.

For one gigantic example, absolutely never, even tacitly, agree that such a concept as "hate speech" exists, never use the phrase unless criticizing it, and always trap it between quotation marks.

Be not afraid of using "nigger" when discussing its censorship or when discussing language generally, but remember not to fall into the trap of calling it "hate speech." "Slur" is about as far as I'd go. For god's sake, never use the infantile expression "N-word."

I like to substitute "race hatred" for "racist." It's more specific, it emphasizes the actual category of race, and it avoids the main word-weapon of the left.

This will get you banned from social media but being honest is worth it.

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does trivialize the situation when it is used to gloss over a specific problem. It's dismissive when used that way, a lazy habit that discourages real criticism.

6
OldBullLee 6 points ago +6 / -0

you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard you retard

3
OldBullLee 3 points ago +3 / -0

So this thing believes getting blown to smithereens is preferable to hearing the dreaded "nigger" and it assumes "hate speech" is an actual concept.

Garbage in, garbage out.

7
OldBullLee 7 points ago +7 / -0

This one might be more discreet about the millions he funnels into his personal Swiss bank account.

7
OldBullLee 7 points ago +7 / -0

How long until the "self esteem" of many millions of people is satisfied? How long do they need unearned praise heaped upon them until the sin of American slavery is expiated?

NEVAH, you pussy honkies, NEVAH!

Because having a dedicated month to preen about the rather limited accomplishments of black Americans and to weep over the history of their persecution keeps the resentment flowing at the levels needed to maintain the highest possible level of conflict.

We went wrong when we became hypnotized by the egotistic notion of "self esteem." Bring back dignity.

5
OldBullLee 5 points ago +5 / -0

AAAAAHAAAAAhahahaha!

You want fortune cookie or happy ending?"

15
OldBullLee 15 points ago +15 / -0

Bro, you've got to stop reading YouTube comments and take a break from Twatter. Has this dude learned nothing from all those Joe Rogan interviews?

He needs to be a guest on Matt and Shane's Secret Podcast.

14
OldBullLee 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'll try to do my part, Seth. But it's hard to keep a sense of humor in the face of the absolute ruthlessness of the tranny lobby and the ignorance or cowardice of those who think it's merely a matter of "live and let live."

13
OldBullLee 13 points ago +13 / -0

Too bad it wasn't this easy to trash teachers and change courses when I was in 12th grade.

I would have had my HS dump Willa Cather and Frank Norris for underground comix.

Shakespeare will be around when these fucked-up little indians are dust and their jumped-up "indigenous literature" more forgotten than it already is, if it exists at all other than something hanging in the outhouse next to the old newspapers.

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. These changes were greased by the fairly successful attempt to sell Kabuki-like nightmarish drag queens as just wholesome neighbors like Aunt Bee while they get off on bumping and grinding for fat, stupid housewives and their confused, suffering children while laughing at the "transphobes" they bamboozled.

And because the opposition is reactionary, activists have had the opportunity to burrow into the feeble consciousnesses of liberals, making resistance that much harder. I think normal, reasonably conservative people will have the last laugh, though.

3
OldBullLee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Save the lives of degenerates who foul the streets, making them unsafe for normal citizens.

Goddamned bleeding heart do-gooder social workers can't conceive of the concept of individual agency. Nobody is responsible for his actions to spineless dreamers like this.

3
OldBullLee 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you stop the enabling, entitlements, and welfare; society would probably return to normal because the moral order would assert itself naturally, and the people who are killing themselves with drugs would be their own Social Darwinism. Literally: "We're taking Narcan away from the cops. They have no obligation to save you from yourselves."

This is the necessary social and establishment attitude.

"Rehabilitation" is total BS, a con game that enriches a well-entrenched network of grifters and does nothing to dissuade people from using any sort of drug. In fact, opiate "rehab" in the form of methadone clinics is probably the most egregious example of this, including the fact that they are using addicts as guinea pigs for their "opiate substitute" concoctions that are nothing of the sort.

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

. If people were locked up, ejected from society, or even killed for behaving in this manner, you'd have nothing left but the recreational users who can regulate their behavior, or perhaps, on a long enough timeline, legal drugs that no one wants anyways, because they're familiar enough with the end result to avoid them.

I agree. See my comment.

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Decrim does not go far enough. It simply allows drugged-out degenerates to feel they have license to stagger around the streets on the nod or shoot up in public.

Total legalization of all pharmaceutical "recreational" drugs, sold to 18+ at already-established pharmacies, with zero marketing or advertising (like cigarettes) is the way forward, with no dedicated drug shops other than cannabis, since pot is a relatively benign drug, safer and more user-friendly than alcohol or any other drug taken for pleasure. Eventually, cannabis cafes like those in Holland should replace the current trashy US legal pot shops that market themselves openly and idiotically. Laissez-faire drug selling, even of cannabis, is no longer possible as it was prior to prohibition, thanks to "drug culture."

This scheme would require severe penalties for public intoxication, with greater penalties for publicly using drugs in any way (with one or two exceptions) and greater penalties still for black-marketeering, which shouldn't be a problem if prices aren't over-inflated by predatory taxation, as we see in the case of legal cannabis.

view more: Next ›