1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean to say they fear we might find out what they ACTUALLY deserve rather than the tip of the iceberg they are getting punished for now.

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. We aren't engaging in cancel culture. They are facing consequences for violent speech.

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Simple; this isn't cancel culture, this is consequences for terrible behaviour. Labelling something cancel culture should be reserved for punishment over inconsequential transgressions.

-1
Indipendepede -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's not cancel culture; that's consequences. Part of your duty- maybe even explicitly stated in the hiring contract- in being a teacher is to not be a danger to children. Being a pedo naturally falls into that category and is why background checks are required when working with children.

43
Indipendepede 43 points ago +43 / -0

it's been done so much on the left, the return volley is now scary to them

They aren't afraid because of what they imagine we might do, but because of what they think they deserve.

17
Indipendepede 17 points ago +22 / -5

Nah, cancel culture was and should always mean "getting fired for legal behaviour outside of work". Unless you are committing criminal or damaging acts, you shouldn't have to worry about losing your livelihood. Even then, as they often do, criminals should be able to earn a living after time served.

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to mention the scenario deliberately left out the collateral death and injury from shooting Trump

23
Indipendepede 23 points ago +23 / -0

To believe it was staged, you would need the kind of firearm illiteracy that lets you believe cops should disarm criminals by shooting the weapons out of their hands. Sadly, the description "firearm illiterate" fits leftards perfectly.

7
Indipendepede 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's because it's not Conservative, it's Con-servative. Con-tainment.

6
Indipendepede 6 points ago +6 / -0

I always like the term presstitutes myself.

4
Indipendepede 4 points ago +4 / -0

You could be fully jabbed with all the boosters and vaxmaxxing, but still find mandatory medical "treatments" objectionable.

16
Indipendepede 16 points ago +16 / -0

The filthy proles have ruined MY democracy!

I guess "the continent" is a new euphemism for globohomo or whatever shadowy cabal those faggots are a part of, 'cuz it's sure as hell not in the interests of Europeans.

2
Indipendepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

The best way to get perspective is to find someone with 100IQ and realise about 1/2 the world population is at least as stupid or worse.

2
Indipendepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

psychic stench

I misread that as trench and, yeah, there's a huge, gaping chasm between humanoid animal characters and furries. It's like the difference between a character that's black and a black character; people can sense the intention of the author behind their work and instinctually reject fringe preferences. Luckily, it often percolates throughout their work and is as easily identifiable as other red flags of corruption like CalArts.

10
Indipendepede 10 points ago +10 / -0

people who are willing and incentivized to fully adapt

I think that pretty explicitly eliminates that option.

18
Indipendepede 18 points ago +18 / -0

AAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. And people wonder why I don't play new games anymore.

4
Indipendepede 4 points ago +4 / -0

To think the Covenant could have won if only they had waited for the monkey pox to set in.

24
Indipendepede 24 points ago +24 / -0

Ehhh, should we tell 'im?

view more: Next ›