Due to the patriarchal conditioning and socialization that permeates the world, the average man is at least two generations behind his female counterpart.
In degeneracy? Society suicide? What exactly?
Check statistics: on average, feminists are more intelligent, knowledgeable, educated, learned, financially empowered, and successful than patriarchal women.
They also have zero children, die alone, and leave their life savings to NPR, trade offs!
Neurodivergent writer, intersectional advocate & DEI director who's chronicling this weird world of ours...and making straight white men uncomfortable.
I love the fact that me existing as a 6’1 dirty blonde with blue eyes makes this creature seethe.
These are more or less synonyms, and are a 'wet streets cause rain' situation. The actual cause is going to university. The effect is they are indoctrinated by the mostly extremely left-wing professors running often extremely left-wing programs like women's studies. Feminists don't have college degrees because they're smart, they're feminists because they have college degrees. There's also a huge bias towards women who value having children... having children, which does not require a college degree. Leaving the feminist types who don't have children to be increasingly over-represented in more advanced degrees, not because feminists are more capable, but because non-feminists married a man instead.
financially empowered
This means "Earning money". This is just a sneaky way to say that women who choose to have a career are good, women who choose to raise children are bad. And also that, somehow, men who spend half their lives working and then give that money to their wives are oppressing them by doing so.
successful
As illustrated above, this woman's definition of successful might as well be "Be a feminist". You can pretty much rewrite that sentence as "Feminists don't have children" repeated six times in a row.
Girls mature faster than boys because they former develop boobs and start drawing attention from creeps. Gotta grow up faster when you’re a target.
However, most girls also stop maturing at that same age, stuck in a state of arrested development. They realize they can manipulate the people around them using their sexuality, and that doesn’t require much more personal growth.
Boys mature more slowly because no one views them as adults until they start working. At that point, it’s a slow hard grind to create personal value. By the time a lot of men are 30+ years old, they’re much more mature than even middle aged women.
men and women's brains are different. not kinda the same but a little different. very, very different. physically different. white mass v. grey mass. those drug bags we call glands that squirt immediate, brain-function-overriding drugs right inside your brain (emotions). basic, baked-in instincts.
it's not environment and oh you know girls have to deal with creeps. it's real, physical differences. also women enter puberty about 2-3 years before men. that's it. that's the difference. all direct results of the natural and physical world.
women are children and remain children their entire lives, with respect to male development. this is a real physical fact of how our minds develop. it's evolutionary useful for things to be this way and so they are.
I don’t think I was an adult or fully mature or stabilized into my current brainset until maybe my upper 20s. Maybe even ~30. Having kids forced a huge change as well.
I do feel that many of my female friends and acquaintances had reached the same level of brain stability by roughly the end of college.
This seems like the kind of topic for which there really ought to be some hard science research. I don’t know if there is.
Due to the patriarchal conditioning and socialization that permeates the world, the average man is at least two generations behind his female counterpart.
In degeneracy? Society suicide? What exactly?
Wha's funny about this statement is how untrue it is feminist are literally fast-tracking themselves into extinction with their retardation. So those "2-generation- behind men" will outlast them when the feminists crash everything to the ground.
Feminist love Communism because they can still be picky, because men have no real power, either socially or financially. And they can freely divorce and stay whores forever because they always have the state to fall back on.
Neurodivergent writer, intersectional advocate & DEI director who's chronicling this weird world of ours...and making straight white men uncomfortable.
Right now, Millennial men do not stand a chance at having the kind of relationship they want with younger Millennial women, much less Gen Z women. They should stick with older Millennial women, Xillennial women, and the youngest Gen X women.
Let's assume I fall into Millennial, or I suppose Xillennial (is that the very upper fringe? They are always making up groups). So, there's nearly a zero percent chance any of these groups offer the kind of relationship I want. The only such relationship I would be at all interested in results in family building, and they can't offer that.
on average, feminists are more intelligent, knowledgeable, educated, learned, financially empowered, and successful than patriarchal women
Bwahahahahahaha. I'll give them "educated," because they will rush to define that as advanced degrees. Albeit, they will define all of these things in ways that benefit them.
Well at my age, I was going with more simple answer. I'd be supposed to look for Gen X and boomer women, and they are going to be beyond childbearing age.
Men should date younger women because it increases the number of children they can have. Dating older women greatly limits the amount of children they can have.
What's funny is by destroyed it'll be them opening the borders and flooding these nations with 3rd world bad boys that will quickly put them in a worse "patriarchy" they ever imagined.
Feminism is nothing more than a society-wide shit test. You fail it at your own peril.
The thing to realize is that is actually what they want. But we currently have a problem where our subverted culture has leaked down to law enforcement and only White men get arrested for properly controlling women, while brown ones don't.
Here, a desperate "cougar" attempts to use words and social status to capture her prey. Success means attention and the slim possibility for a mate, or at least a series of evenings not spent alone.
Medium posts by cat urine soaked nobodies aren't known for their high quality discourse. But we do have another glaring example of just how much of their life is pure, lighthouse powerlevel projection.
They need to be “raised” still, which is why they’ll benefit from the wisdom of an older partner.
Nothing says "Daddy never raised me" quite like documenting your burning hatred of men and their happiness in a useless blog.
There's nothing wrong dating a woman a bit older than you, but feminists downplay how once a woman is in her 30's the odds of her having issues conceiving, producing, and delivering a healthy child increase at an exponential rate. It's something like once a woman is in her 40's she's got a 1 in 12 chance of the child being a downie, and that's only one illness.
Sperm quality also decreases as a man ages but doesn't kick in until he's in his 40's. And I would have to check again but I think this only pertains to the ability to conceive, but not the risk of offspring having illness. This ends up with people downplaying the problems with an elderly man getting women pregnant, but they are overlooking that this increases the risk of the man getting severely ill or dying while his child is still growing up and leaving his child to be raised without an appropriate father figure.
Written by Cindy (((Steinberg))) (she/her) Neurodivergent writer, intersectional advocate & DEI director who's chronicling this weird world of ours...and making straight white men uncomfortable.
Don't bother reading it. This is all you need to know.
Middle aged loser Berg has a hot take:
In degeneracy? Society suicide? What exactly?
They also have zero children, die alone, and leave their life savings to NPR, trade offs!
I love the fact that me existing as a 6’1 dirty blonde with blue eyes makes this creature seethe.
These are more or less synonyms, and are a 'wet streets cause rain' situation. The actual cause is going to university. The effect is they are indoctrinated by the mostly extremely left-wing professors running often extremely left-wing programs like women's studies. Feminists don't have college degrees because they're smart, they're feminists because they have college degrees. There's also a huge bias towards women who value having children... having children, which does not require a college degree. Leaving the feminist types who don't have children to be increasingly over-represented in more advanced degrees, not because feminists are more capable, but because non-feminists married a man instead.
This means "Earning money". This is just a sneaky way to say that women who choose to have a career are good, women who choose to raise children are bad. And also that, somehow, men who spend half their lives working and then give that money to their wives are oppressing them by doing so.
As illustrated above, this woman's definition of successful might as well be "Be a feminist". You can pretty much rewrite that sentence as "Feminists don't have children" repeated six times in a row.
Girls mature faster than boys because they former develop boobs and start drawing attention from creeps. Gotta grow up faster when you’re a target.
However, most girls also stop maturing at that same age, stuck in a state of arrested development. They realize they can manipulate the people around them using their sexuality, and that doesn’t require much more personal growth.
Boys mature more slowly because no one views them as adults until they start working. At that point, it’s a slow hard grind to create personal value. By the time a lot of men are 30+ years old, they’re much more mature than even middle aged women.
men and women's brains are different. not kinda the same but a little different. very, very different. physically different. white mass v. grey mass. those drug bags we call glands that squirt immediate, brain-function-overriding drugs right inside your brain (emotions). basic, baked-in instincts.
it's not environment and oh you know girls have to deal with creeps. it's real, physical differences. also women enter puberty about 2-3 years before men. that's it. that's the difference. all direct results of the natural and physical world.
women are children and remain children their entire lives, with respect to male development. this is a real physical fact of how our minds develop. it's evolutionary useful for things to be this way and so they are.
I don’t think I was an adult or fully mature or stabilized into my current brainset until maybe my upper 20s. Maybe even ~30. Having kids forced a huge change as well.
I do feel that many of my female friends and acquaintances had reached the same level of brain stability by roughly the end of college.
This seems like the kind of topic for which there really ought to be some hard science research. I don’t know if there is.
I was a fully functional adult in my early 20s. I’m the best version of myself now at 40.
Know the difference.
Is there a reason you never capitalize your sentences?
In degeneracy? Society suicide? What exactly?
Wha's funny about this statement is how untrue it is feminist are literally fast-tracking themselves into extinction with their retardation. So those "2-generation- behind men" will outlast them when the feminists crash everything to the ground.
Feminist love Communism because they can still be picky, because men have no real power, either socially or financially. And they can freely divorce and stay whores forever because they always have the state to fall back on.
If men are two generations behind women then they should date two generations younger not older.
How much more obvious can she make her lonely desperation?
About that much more obvious
Let's assume I fall into Millennial, or I suppose Xillennial (is that the very upper fringe? They are always making up groups). So, there's nearly a zero percent chance any of these groups offer the kind of relationship I want. The only such relationship I would be at all interested in results in family building, and they can't offer that.
Bwahahahahahaha. I'll give them "educated," because they will rush to define that as advanced degrees. Albeit, they will define all of these things in ways that benefit them.
Well at my age, I was going with more simple answer. I'd be supposed to look for Gen X and boomer women, and they are going to be beyond childbearing age.
Absolutely this. The youngest Millennial woman now is 29.5. Gen X is completely barren now.
Men our age want a family, not a companion.
This might be the most cope I've ever seen in one piece.
SOURCE: A bitter, old hag that can't even score hookups.
Men should date younger women because it increases the number of children they can have. Dating older women greatly limits the amount of children they can have.
Women would rather destroy Western Civilization than admit they become less desirable as they age.
What's funny is by destroyed it'll be them opening the borders and flooding these nations with 3rd world bad boys that will quickly put them in a worse "patriarchy" they ever imagined.
Feminism is nothing more than a society-wide shit test. You fail it at your own peril.
The thing to realize is that is actually what they want. But we currently have a problem where our subverted culture has leaked down to law enforcement and only White men get arrested for properly controlling women, while brown ones don't.
Here, a desperate "cougar" attempts to use words and social status to capture her prey. Success means attention and the slim possibility for a mate, or at least a series of evenings not spent alone.
Medium posts by cat urine soaked nobodies aren't known for their high quality discourse. But we do have another glaring example of just how much of their life is pure, lighthouse powerlevel projection.
Nothing says "Daddy never raised me" quite like documenting your burning hatred of men and their happiness in a useless blog.
of course
There's nothing wrong dating a woman a bit older than you, but feminists downplay how once a woman is in her 30's the odds of her having issues conceiving, producing, and delivering a healthy child increase at an exponential rate. It's something like once a woman is in her 40's she's got a 1 in 12 chance of the child being a downie, and that's only one illness.
Sperm quality also decreases as a man ages but doesn't kick in until he's in his 40's. And I would have to check again but I think this only pertains to the ability to conceive, but not the risk of offspring having illness. This ends up with people downplaying the problems with an elderly man getting women pregnant, but they are overlooking that this increases the risk of the man getting severely ill or dying while his child is still growing up and leaving his child to be raised without an appropriate father figure.
Don't bother reading it. This is all you need to know.
I did and it’s glorious glorious cope.
They mistake cope for empowerment.
This is too perfect. Absurd take. Post-wall women crying. Author named Steinberg. Pronouns.
Has to be fake.
if a man likes you, he'll date you.
if you can't get a date, refer to the above statement.
And if a woman likes you, you’ll know. If they don’t, it’ll be obvious too.
Femcel spotted