The problem is failure to understand that women don't actually have agency.

They don't whore around and abandon families because they want to, they do it because they've been told to, and don't have the ability to resist.

Women who "make good choices" all have positive influences telling them to make those choices. If they don't, they listen to the TV, magazines, influencers, etc.

You can blame women all you want, but the reality is that men tolerated feminism, which ultimately posits that women can "choose for themselves". Everything else follows from there.

You dont want to end up like Korea either .Korea has both extreme feminist and very strong men's right activist groups and both groups shunning the opposite sex to the point that they have the lowest birth rate in the world now.

You're basically saying they aren't capable of basic human decency and would choose extinction of the species over it.

We have over a century of them riding their raw hedonism into levels of depression and suffering our ancestors couldn't even fathom, and millennia of literature showing that none of that is new.

What kind of retard thinks women won't sink with the short term pleasure ship before they ever admit to being wrong or sacrifice anything?

So, expecting women to treat us like human beings

You have issues. I never accepted your retarded frame. I just pointed out that even you accepted that your ideas would result in extinction.

Exactly, any more than a computer program is.

If they are told to act decently, they will. If the sum influence of their perception of "society" and their peer group says otherwise, they will act monstrously. You can see this in how eating disorders, Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, and many other mental illnesses manifest in women; it transmits through their peer group in a way that doesn't have a parallel in men. I think this is because they are actually unable to make their own decisions, and expecting them to is actually quite cruel.

I can't think of a single example of a woman who contradicts this. Even a contrarian woman like Rosa Parks was backed by an organized civil rights group. OTOH, there are many examples, both personally and historically, of men going against societal consensus and being eventually validated.

For many women, their positive influence is a father or husband. Single women tend to behave badly because they have no conscience, and no external force (like a religious group) keeping them in line. Then they create social circles full of other women which creates a feedback loop.

I'm not saying this to defend or excuse their actions, but to point out the meaninglessness of the idea of them "choosing" to preserve the species.