So, truth=hate. That's about right from these people.
"Important minority group". LoL. If we were to list all the societal contributions by black people and then list all of the societal ills caused by them does anyone in their right mind think it would balance out to a net positive contribution?
The only social contributions by black people (let's exclude wiggers here for the sake of simplicity) that I'm aware of is their willingness to kill troons. A valuable public service indeed, but it's impossible to make a reasonable argument that it outweighs all the problems they cause.
Amazing you can count the amount of notable black scientists and inventors on one hand yet the list of inventions out of Europe is a mile long. And in ancient times, Greeks, Romans, Chinese, etc. But how many subsahrin African inventions that I can think of? zero
Funny now they quickly narrowed all “people of color” down to a single “important minority group”. It’s as if they tried to be vague but couldn’t help themselves in calling out niggers
The truly weird thing is that their leadership caste is still overwhelmingly white men. I'm sure they're using blacks as useful idiots, but I'm not sure what their end-game is with whipping up whites with self loathing.
They also must be pretty secure in their positions to not be afraid that the masses screaming "kill whitey" won't notice the color of their skin and remove them.
Im asian. Its why i defend white people and is anti woke. I know asian males are next to be targeted. Heck we already are since we get gimped for SAT and asians are grouped up with whites for acting white lol.
I love how the only time you'll acknowledge race is to hate on white women. The only time you differentiate women is to single out white women. Funny, since it's counter to all your usual monolithic thinking.
There are many problems with modern women. There are many problems with modern white women. But many of those same traits in white women are in all women, so it's funny to suddenly start categorizing.
It wouldn't be so ridiculous, if it wasn't coming from you, who always hates women, but suddenly needs to differentiate and separate. Get a new shtick.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda, that it is just an anti-male agenda, but people still say the same tired bullshit.
I've read the ESG reports. I've studied their NGOs. I've archived probably a thousand websites.
Every single ESG target that mentions race, has an identical one for gender that doesn't mention race.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women. That's why the establishment right stopped trying to repeal it and created "race-based discrimination" narratives.
There. Is. No. Race. Based. Angle.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated against openly in the way men are, and I'll re-evaluate my position.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda...
HAHAHAHAHA. Oh my. Are you serious?
Every single ESG target that mentions race, has an identical one for gender that doesn't mention race.
But it does mention race! You yourself are saying there is racial discrimination baked in. Multiple things can be true at the same time. There is an anti-male agenda, I absolutely agree. There is also an anti-white agenda. An anti-Christian agenda. A general anti-Western agenda.
Just because you hate women and think they're out to get men, doesn't mean there can't be racism. You sound like a progressive stacker when you say shit like that. You're basically saying there can't be racism because there is sexism. As I've said, there is sexism. But there is also racism.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women.
Are you talking per capita or raw numbers? Because there are a lot more white women (for now) than there are "POCs." The ease of entry is better for nonwhites than for women, though. If we're talking something like college or hiring policies, nonwhite trumps white women. Doesn't mean the current system doesn't benefit white women - it absolutely does - but nonwhites are still higher on the totem pole. For an example, there was that guy that got into Stanford by writing "#BlackLivesMatter" like a hundred times. That was a Muslim dude.
There. Is. No. Race. Based. Angle.
Bruh. I can't even with you sometimes. They'll openly say they want less white people, and that they'll prop up nonwhites. This is just the tip of the iceberg, but I think it's a good example since it was such a high profile person: Joe Biden, holding the office of Vice President of the US, said it would be great when whites were a minority. The freaking VP, man. Just openly.
Also, just look at demographics. Most first-world white majority countries dropped from +90% white to ~60% white in less than a century. While our leaders fucking bragged about it.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated again openly in the way men are, and I'll re-evaluate my position.
Firstly, I'm not sure you intended to, but that massively shifts the goal posts. Why? Because, let's say for the sake of argument white women are never discriminated against. They are, which I'll get to in a second, but bear with me. Alright, white women are immune. Still doesn't preclude that white men - white men - couldn't still be discriminated against at a greater rate than nonwhite men. So even if white women were immune, there could still be race-based anti-white discrimination going on. So your request is a total non sequitur.
Anyway, when are white women discriminated against? First thing that comes to mind is something like Muslim rape gangs. White women were literally told to shut up, not report rapes, wear sneakers so they could outrun their attackers, not go out at night, etc. And, I mean, did you see what she was wearing?! That narrative was going on in Germany, Sweden, etc. Countries that were actually fairly high on the feminist list, in fact. Even women often value nonwhites over white women. A bunch of the most anti white woman rhetoric comes from white women.
For more discrimination, white women are often given less of a chance against nonwhite women in hiring and the like. Again, goes back to your non sequitur. Even if white women had a systemic advantage over all nonwhite men - they don't - they can still be given less favorability than nonwhite women.
Also, just to make it very clear, you can recognize discrimination against whites without being one of the "stormfags" you like to go on about. Just for the record, I am not a Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent. In case you want to go that route. Anti-white discrimination is blatant, and I'm sick of it. Simple as.
He is one. Exactly like Antonio. In every regard but one, he a far leftist, here posing as right wing. He's preferable to Antonio in several ways, first because he's just an idiot and not a deliberate subversive.
Just because you hate women and think they're out to get men, doesn't mean there can't be racism. You sound like a progressive stacker when you say shit like that. You're basically saying there can't be racism because there is sexism. As I've said, there is sexism. But there is also racism.
No, what I'm saying is that racial solidarity is ridiculous when the other half sits on top of a pedestal so large it can be seen from space.
You're suggesting the logic is :
Women of Color™ > White women > Men
So why on earth would I defend the people trying to shut me out? Let them burn.
Are you talking per capita or raw numbers? Because there are a lot more white women (for now) than there are "POCs."
Correct. But no, it was actually an article that talked about it in terms of advancement. There were more white women per capita that achieved more than their GPA deserved than any other group.
The ease of entry is better for nonwhites than for women, though. If we're talking something like college or hiring policies, nonwhite trumps white women.
Disagree. Women's utter dominance over the college space hasn't been challenged. If they were really basing it on race, they would bring in non-white men to even that out. There is clearly a conscious effort to retain a female majority at most colleges.
Doesn't mean the current system doesn't benefit white women - it absolutely does - but nonwhites are still higher on the totem pole. For an example, there was that guy that got into Stanford by writing "#BlackLivesMatter" like a hundred times. That was a Muslim dude.
That was a virtue signal. They let him in to signal how goodthink they are while letting in probably a thousand more white women.
Also, just look at demographics. Most first-world white majority countries dropped from +90% white to ~60% white in less than a century. While our leaders fucking bragged about it.
I'm going to bullet point this because it will make more sense than writing an essay.
All Western countries are built on a Ponzi scheme like Social Security that must be funded by constant growth in population.
Women became increasingly hostile until this growth was eventually unachievable.
Asking women to be good people would just get them booted out of office, so they arranged to import people from countries with high birth rates.
Women being shitty people is not a conspiracy against white people.
Anyway, when are white women discriminated against? First thing that comes to mind is something like Muslim rape gangs. White women were literally told to shut up, not report rapes, wear sneakers so they could outrun their attackers, not go out at night, etc. And, I mean, did you see what she was wearing?! That narrative was going on in Germany, Sweden, etc
Cologne was proven false and Sweden is a "yes means yes" country that takes all accusations as fact, since 2015.
You basically danced around every single one of my points, and went into detail on something slightly related, so it looks like you're giving an actual rebuttal. Not sure what I expected. I'll go through this quickly, so it's not too long.
Basically, my rebuttal is: Read my comment again, and actually respond to that. But still, I'll go through this comment too.
racial solidarity is ridiculous when the other half sits on top of a pedestal so large it can be seen from space.
But it's not. Women are doing better than men, but it's not the huge swing you act like. They're 50% of the population, and doing somewhat better than the other 50%. There are much bigger disparities out there.
You're suggesting the logic is : Women of Color™ > White women > Men
Not what I said. Nice try, though.
There were more white women per capita that achieved more than their GPA deserved than any other group.
Ah, I see, you're talking equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. You do you, I suppose.
...college...If they were really basing it on race, they would bring in non-white men to even that out.
They do, you just ignore it...
Women became increasingly hostile until this growth was eventually unachievable.
Mass immigration started before the full family breakdown we see today.
Asking women to be good people would just get them booted out of office, so they arranged to import people from countries with high birth rates.
Unrelated. They wanted people who could work for cheaper. It has nothing to do with office dynamics, it has to do with greed. That just happens to screw over the natives in the process.
Cologne was proven false and Sweden is a "yes means yes" country that takes all accusations as fact, since 2015.
Again, total dodge. All my comments were things people actually said. I wasn't talking rape statistics - and you think all rape is fake anyway so there's no point - I was talking how the government was treating white women, and their official responses.
But, yeah, you didn't really address any of what I said head-on, and instead went off on unrelated things...
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda
Shit, I better tell all the negroes back home that live just to mug and rough up any white person they see they don't have an agenda. Its a secret ploy by the elite women and their "reports" that these barely literate ghetto rats totally read and march for.
I know you are retarded, but surely you understand that two things can exist at the same time right?
Woman raised criminals abused by feminist single parents are a terrible retort.
Regardless, when people talk about an agenda, they're talking about a visible, concrete plan, not Tyrone who got beat by his mom since he was 3 killing Karen.
I expect better from someone who understands what kind of people women are. You're just helping them.
Woman raised criminals abused by feminist single parents are a terrible retort.
That's why I said two things can exist at once. The point you didn't address at all, because I fail to see how X means that Y cannot possibly exist at all.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda, that it is just an anti-male agenda,
No, you haven't. Minority men get included in DIE shit all the time.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women.
People who say this assume that the best thing for white women is to be dried up croon worker units with worthless degrees.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated against openly in the way men are
Amy Cooper, the Central Park "Karen." Bonus: You can say "Karen" in a derogatory fashion all over radlib places like "Black People Twitter." You can't use Tyrone, Jamaal, Shenequa, Shlomo, etc. in the same way. San Francisco even named a law after it.
Third Wave feminism has been defined in its later years by a rejection of the interests of white women in general and criticism that female members of minority groups haven't been given their fair due in the movement. That's why the women's march pretends that crazy hijab-Muslims are somehow 'feminist', e.g. Linda Sarsour. And why big-mouth Tamika Mallory was considered a leader.
Shit like this is why they reported an SUV crushing parade goers in Waukesha for months, until court proceedings forced some of the media to put a name to the SUV. Darrell E. Brooks Jr. was locked in his SUV by whiteness, and forced to watch in horror as his Ultra MAGA SUV plowed over parade attendees, young and old.
Had a shitty life, spent most of his time and money fighting a woman in court for custody, lost, turned to (woman-led) BLM, who told him white people did it.
Actually, before women's puppets in the alt-right media jumped on it, there was a lot of conversation about his custody battle and how it was clearly women's fault that he went crazy.
Of course, this necessary reckoning against women's divide and conquer strategy couldn't be allowed.
I don't even know that this is from the Mods. It may actually be from the Admins.
They have this stance basically that is understood as: if a transperson in any case is considered "ugly"; it's considered an attack on the entire identity group.
If they moved that same position to just apply to everyone, where all people are only an extension of their declared political collective, and Rule 1 already explicitly allows attacks on against whites/christians/men as a collective; then this is really the only possible result.
It makes sense when you consider that the Narrative™ makes no allowance for individual agency. No one ever decides to do something on their own, the System™ makes them do it. Its a handy way of never holding anyone accountable for their actions, because in their world view, no one ever is. It then follows that blacks are not more criminal or violent than any other race, they are unfairly targeted by the System, so highlighting the very high black criminality we can all see with our own two eyes is racist.
The Collectivist approach allows for people to dismiss individual agency in every case, in accordance with their collectivist affiliation.
Black man did something positive? Evidence of the greatness of blackness.
Black man did something negative? Evidence of the effect of whiteness.
White man did something positive? Evidence of whiteness making his life easier.
White man did something negative? Evidence of the inherent villainy of the mayos.
However, this is just an applied collectivism. A true collectivist, let's say a white collectivist would have to take personal responsibility for the bad things that happen.
A white man did something negative? "How did I fail to support my white brother, and police my white community so this doesn't happen again?"
Yes. I avoid the topic. If I said something negative, I'd get a strike or be banned. If I said something positive, it would probably be ok, but who's to judge? Sensitive tranny mods. Individual or group comments is whatever -- they're a team, and I ain't on it.
They didn't walk anything back, they just hid their true intentions. I have no idea what that sub is supposed to be, but it's just a bunch of factory settings NPC outrage bait. Whitey bad, cops bad, Christians bad. It looks like it consists entirely of a feed that's cultivated by a bot that just scrapes leftist news sites for certain keywords. I genuinely wouldn't be surprised to learn a human being hasn't posted there in years.
Make sure you also report woke users for suspected self-harm. They will get a nice email with links to a suicide hotline and a note that a fellow redditor reached out because they were concerned for them. LoL.
This is just them being honest finally, they did this for years with MRAs and were constantly complaining about MRAs showing 'women' in a negative light. The problem for them is, there was just so much fucking content from the MRA perspective the only thing you can do with that is shut it down entirely and that's clearly what they're going to do with most of reddit.
I left the MRA subreddit a long time ago because the mods were stating to cuck. This is a bit of an odd tangent I know but it all ties in. This is how they control the flow of information that people see, I would not be shocked if even the really niche subreddits just get the admin coup treatment on them like the_donald did.
Doesn't surprise me. All someone had to do is say "this bans all posts from countries that aren't White" and suddenly they're on the wrong side of the woke sword.
"A Latino robbery victim beating up a Latino mugger in El Salvador, posted by a Latino from El Salvador?" BANNED FOR RACISM. Any news from China or India? BANNED. That this was even considered briefly as a rule shows how Americentric and plain retarded they are.
I can imagine that either the amount of content they post will shrink significantly or their users will have to dig real hard to aggressors that are white. I don’t know every race that isn’t considered a POC, but I know white isn’t part of that group.
Also, notice how they say “important minority group”. Obviously they’re saying one particular race and they label it as important because they consider them superior to everyone else.
Well, since they're no longer a credible source of information about my company as corporate took over the subreddit, and the porn has become so much boring onlyfans promotions, no big loss. Bye, Felicia.
That’ll be me logging out for good, then. That sub was just about “bad people / jerks / people being dicks getting their comeuppance,” right? Being a dick is something any race can do. Enjoying the comeuppance to dicks is something all races can enjoy. Or so it used to be before critical politics took over everything.
So, truth=hate. That's about right from these people.
"Important minority group". LoL. If we were to list all the societal contributions by black people and then list all of the societal ills caused by them does anyone in their right mind think it would balance out to a net positive contribution?
The only social contributions by black people (let's exclude wiggers here for the sake of simplicity) that I'm aware of is their willingness to kill troons. A valuable public service indeed, but it's impossible to make a reasonable argument that it outweighs all the problems they cause.
They invented home security! And light bulbs! And peanuts! And potato chips! And Super Soakers!
Amazing you can count the amount of notable black scientists and inventors on one hand yet the list of inventions out of Europe is a mile long. And in ancient times, Greeks, Romans, Chinese, etc. But how many subsahrin African inventions that I can think of? zero
Funny now they quickly narrowed all “people of color” down to a single “important minority group”. It’s as if they tried to be vague but couldn’t help themselves in calling out niggers
Sickening how liberals demonize Whites and worshup black supremacist blm vermin
The truly weird thing is that their leadership caste is still overwhelmingly white men. I'm sure they're using blacks as useful idiots, but I'm not sure what their end-game is with whipping up whites with self loathing.
They also must be pretty secure in their positions to not be afraid that the masses screaming "kill whitey" won't notice the color of their skin and remove them.
hate facts are real
"Orwellian" gets thrown around a lot but...
Also, I am so unbelievably sick and tired of the onslaught on white people.
It's mainstream, constant, nonstop, and there's no easy way to fight it.
They want you gone, never forget and never forgive.
Next is Asians, it already kinda is. Blacks have been targeting them for years by now, media will soon follow.
Im asian. Its why i defend white people and is anti woke. I know asian males are next to be targeted. Heck we already are since we get gimped for SAT and asians are grouped up with whites for acting white lol.
Reddit and liberalism is black supremacist scum
White women sitting on the top of their pedestal, on top of a giant ivory tower : "Did you hear something?"
I love how the only time you'll acknowledge race is to hate on white women. The only time you differentiate women is to single out white women. Funny, since it's counter to all your usual monolithic thinking.
There are many problems with modern women. There are many problems with modern white women. But many of those same traits in white women are in all women, so it's funny to suddenly start categorizing.
It wouldn't be so ridiculous, if it wasn't coming from you, who always hates women, but suddenly needs to differentiate and separate. Get a new shtick.
Cause he's a jew
I'm not.
You talked about race, I talked about race.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda, that it is just an anti-male agenda, but people still say the same tired bullshit.
I've read the ESG reports. I've studied their NGOs. I've archived probably a thousand websites.
Every single ESG target that mentions race, has an identical one for gender that doesn't mention race.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women. That's why the establishment right stopped trying to repeal it and created "race-based discrimination" narratives.
There. Is. No. Race. Based. Angle.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated against openly in the way men are, and I'll re-evaluate my position.
HAHAHAHAHA. Oh my. Are you serious?
But it does mention race! You yourself are saying there is racial discrimination baked in. Multiple things can be true at the same time. There is an anti-male agenda, I absolutely agree. There is also an anti-white agenda. An anti-Christian agenda. A general anti-Western agenda.
Just because you hate women and think they're out to get men, doesn't mean there can't be racism. You sound like a progressive stacker when you say shit like that. You're basically saying there can't be racism because there is sexism. As I've said, there is sexism. But there is also racism.
Are you talking per capita or raw numbers? Because there are a lot more white women (for now) than there are "POCs." The ease of entry is better for nonwhites than for women, though. If we're talking something like college or hiring policies, nonwhite trumps white women. Doesn't mean the current system doesn't benefit white women - it absolutely does - but nonwhites are still higher on the totem pole. For an example, there was that guy that got into Stanford by writing "#BlackLivesMatter" like a hundred times. That was a Muslim dude.
Bruh. I can't even with you sometimes. They'll openly say they want less white people, and that they'll prop up nonwhites. This is just the tip of the iceberg, but I think it's a good example since it was such a high profile person: Joe Biden, holding the office of Vice President of the US, said it would be great when whites were a minority. The freaking VP, man. Just openly.
Also, just look at demographics. Most first-world white majority countries dropped from +90% white to ~60% white in less than a century. While our leaders fucking bragged about it.
Firstly, I'm not sure you intended to, but that massively shifts the goal posts. Why? Because, let's say for the sake of argument white women are never discriminated against. They are, which I'll get to in a second, but bear with me. Alright, white women are immune. Still doesn't preclude that white men - white men - couldn't still be discriminated against at a greater rate than nonwhite men. So even if white women were immune, there could still be race-based anti-white discrimination going on. So your request is a total non sequitur.
Anyway, when are white women discriminated against? First thing that comes to mind is something like Muslim rape gangs. White women were literally told to shut up, not report rapes, wear sneakers so they could outrun their attackers, not go out at night, etc. And, I mean, did you see what she was wearing?! That narrative was going on in Germany, Sweden, etc. Countries that were actually fairly high on the feminist list, in fact. Even women often value nonwhites over white women. A bunch of the most anti white woman rhetoric comes from white women.
For more discrimination, white women are often given less of a chance against nonwhite women in hiring and the like. Again, goes back to your non sequitur. Even if white women had a systemic advantage over all nonwhite men - they don't - they can still be given less favorability than nonwhite women.
Also, just to make it very clear, you can recognize discrimination against whites without being one of the "stormfags" you like to go on about. Just for the record, I am not a Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent. In case you want to go that route. Anti-white discrimination is blatant, and I'm sick of it. Simple as.
He is one. Exactly like Antonio. In every regard but one, he a far leftist, here posing as right wing. He's preferable to Antonio in several ways, first because he's just an idiot and not a deliberate subversive.
Don't bother trying to convince him dude, a ton of people have tried - he never changes.
I know, but it's fun anyway sometimes.
Probably helps if you're not a stormfaggot.
Nothing wrong with being a Nazi
Let's for the sake of argument say that's true. There's still something wrong with conflating Nazism with caring about white people.
No, what I'm saying is that racial solidarity is ridiculous when the other half sits on top of a pedestal so large it can be seen from space.
You're suggesting the logic is :
Women of Color™ > White women > Men
So why on earth would I defend the people trying to shut me out? Let them burn.
Correct. But no, it was actually an article that talked about it in terms of advancement. There were more white women per capita that achieved more than their GPA deserved than any other group.
Disagree. Women's utter dominance over the college space hasn't been challenged. If they were really basing it on race, they would bring in non-white men to even that out. There is clearly a conscious effort to retain a female majority at most colleges.
That was a virtue signal. They let him in to signal how goodthink they are while letting in probably a thousand more white women.
I'm going to bullet point this because it will make more sense than writing an essay.
All Western countries are built on a Ponzi scheme like Social Security that must be funded by constant growth in population.
Women became increasingly hostile until this growth was eventually unachievable.
Asking women to be good people would just get them booted out of office, so they arranged to import people from countries with high birth rates.
Women being shitty people is not a conspiracy against white people.
Cologne was proven false and Sweden is a "yes means yes" country that takes all accusations as fact, since 2015.
You basically danced around every single one of my points, and went into detail on something slightly related, so it looks like you're giving an actual rebuttal. Not sure what I expected. I'll go through this quickly, so it's not too long.
Basically, my rebuttal is: Read my comment again, and actually respond to that. But still, I'll go through this comment too.
But it's not. Women are doing better than men, but it's not the huge swing you act like. They're 50% of the population, and doing somewhat better than the other 50%. There are much bigger disparities out there.
Not what I said. Nice try, though.
Ah, I see, you're talking equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. You do you, I suppose.
They do, you just ignore it...
Mass immigration started before the full family breakdown we see today.
Unrelated. They wanted people who could work for cheaper. It has nothing to do with office dynamics, it has to do with greed. That just happens to screw over the natives in the process.
Again, total dodge. All my comments were things people actually said. I wasn't talking rape statistics - and you think all rape is fake anyway so there's no point - I was talking how the government was treating white women, and their official responses.
But, yeah, you didn't really address any of what I said head-on, and instead went off on unrelated things...
Shit, I better tell all the negroes back home that live just to mug and rough up any white person they see they don't have an agenda. Its a secret ploy by the elite women and their "reports" that these barely literate ghetto rats totally read and march for.
I know you are retarded, but surely you understand that two things can exist at the same time right?
Woman raised criminals abused by feminist single parents are a terrible retort.
Regardless, when people talk about an agenda, they're talking about a visible, concrete plan, not Tyrone who got beat by his mom since he was 3 killing Karen.
I expect better from someone who understands what kind of people women are. You're just helping them.
That's why I said two things can exist at once. The point you didn't address at all, because I fail to see how X means that Y cannot possibly exist at all.
Aren't children of all races generally raised by their moms?
No, you haven't. Minority men get included in DIE shit all the time.
People who say this assume that the best thing for white women is to be dried up croon worker units with worthless degrees.
Amy Cooper, the Central Park "Karen." Bonus: You can say "Karen" in a derogatory fashion all over radlib places like "Black People Twitter." You can't use Tyrone, Jamaal, Shenequa, Shlomo, etc. in the same way. San Francisco even named a law after it.
You're not the sharpest tool in the shed
Third Wave feminism has been defined in its later years by a rejection of the interests of white women in general and criticism that female members of minority groups haven't been given their fair due in the movement. That's why the women's march pretends that crazy hijab-Muslims are somehow 'feminist', e.g. Linda Sarsour. And why big-mouth Tamika Mallory was considered a leader.
Why do you hate white men?
One of the same reasons he hates everyone else. There are two reason Imp hates someone:
A) Is a woman.
B) Does not hate women to an adequate degree.
So I'm assuming white men are "tradcucks" and sex traitors, and that's why he hates them.
Til black supremacist blm thugs totally arent black
Shit like this is why they reported an SUV crushing parade goers in Waukesha for months, until court proceedings forced some of the media to put a name to the SUV. Darrell E. Brooks Jr. was locked in his SUV by whiteness, and forced to watch in horror as his Ultra MAGA SUV plowed over parade attendees, young and old.
His story is actually very interesting.
Had a shitty life, spent most of his time and money fighting a woman in court for custody, lost, turned to (woman-led) BLM, who told him white people did it.
Blood on their manicured hands.
Well he killed a bunch of women so I guess they’re even?
Only you can take a tragedy where a retarded ape murders a bunch of white people and make it about women.
Actually, before women's puppets in the alt-right media jumped on it, there was a lot of conversation about his custody battle and how it was clearly women's fault that he went crazy.
Of course, this necessary reckoning against women's divide and conquer strategy couldn't be allowed.
Hes a black supremacist subhuman not feminist
I'm not surprised.
I don't even know that this is from the Mods. It may actually be from the Admins.
They have this stance basically that is understood as: if a transperson in any case is considered "ugly"; it's considered an attack on the entire identity group.
If they moved that same position to just apply to everyone, where all people are only an extension of their declared political collective, and Rule 1 already explicitly allows attacks on against whites/christians/men as a collective; then this is really the only possible result.
Did you really need to say it in your big scary mod voice?
It's the only thing the faggot lives for, so yes.
Ooops, my bad.
Sounds like your stupid ass jew rules
That hurt my feelings.
It makes sense when you consider that the Narrative™ makes no allowance for individual agency. No one ever decides to do something on their own, the System™ makes them do it. Its a handy way of never holding anyone accountable for their actions, because in their world view, no one ever is. It then follows that blacks are not more criminal or violent than any other race, they are unfairly targeted by the System, so highlighting the very high black criminality we can all see with our own two eyes is racist.
The Collectivist approach allows for people to dismiss individual agency in every case, in accordance with their collectivist affiliation.
However, this is just an applied collectivism. A true collectivist, let's say a white collectivist would have to take personal responsibility for the bad things that happen.
Nobody wants to do that.
you can't talk about trans people on reddit.
unless you do some sick larping and then you can do whatever you want.
You can't even call one of them ugly.
Yes. I avoid the topic. If I said something negative, I'd get a strike or be banned. If I said something positive, it would probably be ok, but who's to judge? Sensitive tranny mods. Individual or group comments is whatever -- they're a team, and I ain't on it.
I saw this on /pol/ too. It's from 3 years ago and they got BTFO so hard they had to walk it back.
They didn't walk anything back, they just hid their true intentions. I have no idea what that sub is supposed to be, but it's just a bunch of factory settings NPC outrage bait. Whitey bad, cops bad, Christians bad. It looks like it consists entirely of a feed that's cultivated by a bot that just scrapes leftist news sites for certain keywords. I genuinely wouldn't be surprised to learn a human being hasn't posted there in years.
In summation: "The party has determined that we cannot show content that is contrary to the narrative."
Might as well just close the sub at this point, since this rule is going to make the content dryer than a salt mine.
Reality is banned because it's racist.
This is insane! What is this for? I hope there was pushback. What about Idi Amin? The guy that drove his truck into a crowd at the Christmas festival?
Is Reddit, they do not care.
They memory-holed the Waukesha parade massacre within 24 hours once it became obvious the culprit was a real Black supremacist with dreadlocks.
A real shame.
They missed out on a funny trial as he represented himself as a sovereign citizen.
There goes most of your content.
The news has already been doing that for like ten years.
Fine, I'll use a throwaway account to start reporting all cynophobic/zoophobic content, motherfuckers.
Make sure you also report woke users for suspected self-harm. They will get a nice email with links to a suicide hotline and a note that a fellow redditor reached out because they were concerned for them. LoL.
I received those on a near-daily basis.
And if they're Canadian the government will probably reach out to them offering them their "help."
You mean their final solution so far
This is just them being honest finally, they did this for years with MRAs and were constantly complaining about MRAs showing 'women' in a negative light. The problem for them is, there was just so much fucking content from the MRA perspective the only thing you can do with that is shut it down entirely and that's clearly what they're going to do with most of reddit.
I left the MRA subreddit a long time ago because the mods were stating to cuck. This is a bit of an odd tangent I know but it all ties in. This is how they control the flow of information that people see, I would not be shocked if even the really niche subreddits just get the admin coup treatment on them like the_donald did.
They're the majority of the world's population.
this should have happened during BLM riots
It did. This is years old news.
Yeah, that doesn't get people into believing a certain narrative. No sirey.
Link? I can't find the original post
Apparently it's quite old. https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16aTeduRSJ/x/c/4TrJJ4YL9WT
Doesn't surprise me. All someone had to do is say "this bans all posts from countries that aren't White" and suddenly they're on the wrong side of the woke sword.
"A Latino robbery victim beating up a Latino mugger in El Salvador, posted by a Latino from El Salvador?" BANNED FOR RACISM. Any news from China or India? BANNED. That this was even considered briefly as a rule shows how Americentric and plain retarded they are.
I can imagine that either the amount of content they post will shrink significantly or their users will have to dig real hard to aggressors that are white. I don’t know every race that isn’t considered a POC, but I know white isn’t part of that group.
Also, notice how they say “important minority group”. Obviously they’re saying one particular race and they label it as important because they consider them superior to everyone else.
If they weren't cucks they would close the sub now. Okay nvm seems they even fly the alphabet flag there so they probably agree with the changes.
-3 just for saying final solution
Well, since they're no longer a credible source of information about my company as corporate took over the subreddit, and the porn has become so much boring onlyfans promotions, no big loss. Bye, Felicia.
It's something how they reach that point of their own genocide checklist isn't it?
"We host videos of exclusively 1 race, depicting them as violent aggressors. No other race is allowed to be depicted as violent aggressors.
Reddit intends to escalate anti-white racism.
Until they realize they are racist?
(I don’t think they are capable of learning this)
Until anti-white genocide?
(more likely)
Story might be old but the idea will likely return over and over the more things like this come to light
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16aTef3OGz/gotta-pump-those-numbers-up-thos/c/
Sickening. Reddit is a blacl supremacist propaganda site deisgned to demonize and dehumanize Whites while defending black criminals
That’ll be me logging out for good, then. That sub was just about “bad people / jerks / people being dicks getting their comeuppance,” right? Being a dick is something any race can do. Enjoying the comeuppance to dicks is something all races can enjoy. Or so it used to be before critical politics took over everything.
This has always been the ultimate objectives of the Reddit admins.
It's no different than Chinese internet censorship, it's just that instead of the CCP, it's for the NIG
it's from 2020 though: https://twitter.com/Dataracer117/status/1280721636635754496