You basically danced around every single one of my points, and went into detail on something slightly related, so it looks like you're giving an actual rebuttal. Not sure what I expected. I'll go through this quickly, so it's not too long.

Basically, my rebuttal is: Read my comment again, and actually respond to that. But still, I'll go through this comment too.

racial solidarity is ridiculous when the other half sits on top of a pedestal so large it can be seen from space.

But it's not. Women are doing better than men, but it's not the huge swing you act like. They're 50% of the population, and doing somewhat better than the other 50%. There are much bigger disparities out there.

You're suggesting the logic is : Women of Color™ > White women > Men

Not what I said. Nice try, though.

There were more white women per capita that achieved more than their GPA deserved than any other group.

Ah, I see, you're talking equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. You do you, I suppose.

...college...If they were really basing it on race, they would bring in non-white men to even that out.

They do, you just ignore it...

Women became increasingly hostile until this growth was eventually unachievable.

Mass immigration started before the full family breakdown we see today.

Asking women to be good people would just get them booted out of office, so they arranged to import people from countries with high birth rates.

Unrelated. They wanted people who could work for cheaper. It has nothing to do with office dynamics, it has to do with greed. That just happens to screw over the natives in the process.

Cologne was proven false and Sweden is a "yes means yes" country that takes all accusations as fact, since 2015.

Again, total dodge. All my comments were things people actually said. I wasn't talking rape statistics - and you think all rape is fake anyway so there's no point - I was talking how the government was treating white women, and their official responses.

But, yeah, you didn't really address any of what I said head-on, and instead went off on unrelated things...