I don't even know that this is from the Mods. It may actually be from the Admins.
They have this stance basically that is understood as: if a transperson in any case is considered "ugly"; it's considered an attack on the entire identity group.
If they moved that same position to just apply to everyone, where all people are only an extension of their declared political collective, and Rule 1 already explicitly allows attacks on against whites/christians/men as a collective; then this is really the only possible result.
It makes sense when you consider that the Narrative™ makes no allowance for individual agency. No one ever decides to do something on their own, the System™ makes them do it. Its a handy way of never holding anyone accountable for their actions, because in their world view, no one ever is. It then follows that blacks are not more criminal or violent than any other race, they are unfairly targeted by the System, so highlighting the very high black criminality we can all see with our own two eyes is racist.
The Collectivist approach allows for people to dismiss individual agency in every case, in accordance with their collectivist affiliation.
Black man did something positive? Evidence of the greatness of blackness.
Black man did something negative? Evidence of the effect of whiteness.
White man did something positive? Evidence of whiteness making his life easier.
White man did something negative? Evidence of the inherent villainy of the mayos.
However, this is just an applied collectivism. A true collectivist, let's say a white collectivist would have to take personal responsibility for the bad things that happen.
A white man did something negative? "How did I fail to support my white brother, and police my white community so this doesn't happen again?"
Yes. I avoid the topic. If I said something negative, I'd get a strike or be banned. If I said something positive, it would probably be ok, but who's to judge? Sensitive tranny mods. Individual or group comments is whatever -- they're a team, and I ain't on it.
I'm not surprised.
I don't even know that this is from the Mods. It may actually be from the Admins.
They have this stance basically that is understood as: if a transperson in any case is considered "ugly"; it's considered an attack on the entire identity group.
If they moved that same position to just apply to everyone, where all people are only an extension of their declared political collective, and Rule 1 already explicitly allows attacks on against whites/christians/men as a collective; then this is really the only possible result.
It's the only thing the faggot lives for, so yes.
Ooops, my bad.
That hurt my feelings.
It makes sense when you consider that the Narrative™ makes no allowance for individual agency. No one ever decides to do something on their own, the System™ makes them do it. Its a handy way of never holding anyone accountable for their actions, because in their world view, no one ever is. It then follows that blacks are not more criminal or violent than any other race, they are unfairly targeted by the System, so highlighting the very high black criminality we can all see with our own two eyes is racist.
The Collectivist approach allows for people to dismiss individual agency in every case, in accordance with their collectivist affiliation.
However, this is just an applied collectivism. A true collectivist, let's say a white collectivist would have to take personal responsibility for the bad things that happen.
Nobody wants to do that.
you can't talk about trans people on reddit.
unless you do some sick larping and then you can do whatever you want.
You can't even call one of them ugly.
Yes. I avoid the topic. If I said something negative, I'd get a strike or be banned. If I said something positive, it would probably be ok, but who's to judge? Sensitive tranny mods. Individual or group comments is whatever -- they're a team, and I ain't on it.