This is the point that the general population needs to recognize that a "race war" is already well underway. This is just the pro-European side losing, and the anti-European coalition winning. It's not about fairness, law, justice, or duty, it's about attacking their enemy, that's all.
Yep. That's it. And we're going to lose. 250 years is a good life span for a country, now it's going to shit because leftists and dindus are going to overrun it with trash
250 years is not a good lifespan. That’s short enough to be embarrassing. For frame of reference, the country of my parents was started a thousand years ago and is still going strong today.
America is the best country in the world, period. Don’t blame leftists. They suck but they are what, 20-30% of the population? They’re misfits and losers on top of that. So how are they dictating anything?
People stopped caring about God and clung to their wealth instead. That’s why they don’t speak up and why Conservatives are losing. Rather than being destructive and subversive like the left, they are merely cowardly and dishonest.
It wasn’t just wealth though. People caved in to women 100% of the time. We began the decline with the women’s rights movement. They wanted the vote, to work, to run the church... basically to be men. And because men wanted easy sex instead of doing the right thing, they gave in. Now we live in a freaking feminine hellscape where everyone is a victim and needs special attention, especially the poor blacks.
Oh some poor kid drowned or got dropped from a fence? Just let all the immigrants come in. It’s so sad!
That’s what this verdict was about. Women. No more rule of law and benefit of the doubt. We’re running on feelz now. The video made me feel sad about the poor drugged out black loser so Chauvin must go to prison.
Godless simp Christians and Conservatives put us here.
The Country of your parents, KRZYZOWIEC? Polska zginęła już. 4 raz zginęła. Co żyje teraz nie jest tym samem kraj jak był. Nawet Lud jest inny. Kultura też. Nic nie jest siły lub mocny wystarczyjący i największość polaków nie kochają wolności, nie są gotowych na wojnę. Bycie "Narudowcą" nie jest czegoś że normalny polacy są lub chcę być lub wierzą jest dobra.
It's an okay country. Better than most and there is hope. But it's not the same country and it has died multiple times. It's certainly not 1000 years old. More like 20.
Western Cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt school which was founded and developed in Weimar Germany, which began really being pushed in the US during 1960's, right when immigration was getting opened up as well. And of course the people pushing that ideology were all of a similar anti-European persuasion. Being supported by Wall Street and the international finance system to which they had allies along ideological and ethnic lines.
Liberalism was never a real thing. It was just a tactic the Marxists used until their numbers became large enough to outgrow it.
Remember the anti-war liberals that were so prominent when Bush was invading Iraq? Rather quiet during Obama’s admin, wouldn’t you say?
It’s the same with the ACLU and the rest when it comes to free speech or any other issue. They only care about it if it brings them power. They drop it as soon as they acquire the power for themselves.
Equality is not a Liberal value, it is a Leftist value. Inclusion was never a Liberal value at all. Both are explicitly illiberal values.
Individualism is in contradiction to collectivist protectionist Leftist movements like Feminism.
You can say that Leftism wears liberalism as a skin suit and parades it around to look like it's not collectivist, that's why Communists talk about free speech and adorn themselves with AK's when it suits them, and never when it suits not them.
Then again, that's why Leftism can wear any ideology as a fucking skin suit and parade it around to look better. Leftism wearing Monarchism was Napoleon and Bismark's State Socialism. Leftism wearing Nationalism as a skin-suit is Fascism and National Socialism. Leftism wearing religion as a skin-suit is Liberation Theology.
Leftism is illiberal and is antithetical to Liberalism. That is the nature of all principled ideologies contrasting to Leftism. All non-Leftist ideologies are arguments from principle. All Leftism is arguments from power. Leftism can infect any and all ideologies that exist without exception, because there is no principle that Leftism can't claim to hold, because it has no real principles, only arguments from power. This is why Leftism can be adapted to any system or people. Leftism in Islam is Jihadism, for example.
Equality itself is one of key aspects of liberalism and has been since liberalism came to be, including in conception of individuals as inherently "free," and "equal" to one another. Not to mention liberal "rights" and other stuff.
Only in the Rousseau-ian sense that people are born equal and then starkly vary immediately afterwards, to the point that equality is a meaningless concept in the real world, which it is.
individuals are inherently relational, that is generated by and dependent on the groups; there is no individual without the whole.
You are confusion "individualism" with "atomizaiton" which is completely wrong. Individualism is not opposition to any association with group. If that were the case individualism would have to be explicitly anti-family, and even anti-partner. The idea of a "rugged individual" settling the West with his family would be anti-individual because it contained more than 1 person. Your concept of individualism is reductive nonsense.
Nevertheless, as I've noted IDPol is victimary, with race, gender, etc being proxies for victimhood, as that's the only type of IDPol that liberalism permits. It's a mockery of giving a sh*t about one's own.
While Identity politics is mockery of actually having a duty to one's affiliate group, these are not the only allowed identities in Liberalism. Liberalism allows for any number of identiites including religion, employment, and social groups.
Leftism exploits the concept of victimhood because Leftism is built off of an oppressor-oppressed dynamic.
That only makes sense if you believe that all forms of illiberalism are "leftist," which is fundamentally nonsensical and brings into question the purpose of labeling any opposition as such; are you a capitalist? Certainly an useful way to defend the system while pretending you're opposed to it.
Leftism wearing Nationalism as a skin suit is Fascism and National Socialism because Fascism is the creation of the Leftist ideologies of Syndicalism, Corporatism, and State Socialism using Jingoism and deification of the State as it's primary methods of implementing Socialist revolution. National Socialism is that same deification of the State, but applying the deified state as the intertemporal legacy and arbiter of a racial group which has been socialized into a single synchronized socialist body politic called a "Volksgemeinschaft".
National Socialism and Fascism are illiberal because they are not only Leftist, but explicitly socialist.
Fascism is merely a reaction to liberal capitalism, and rejection of it; it's closest you'll come to right-wing in last hundred or so years. Obviously, liberalism isn't right-wing.
Fascism is not a reaction to the existence of free-markets, it is the system designed for the state to implement the socialist revolution as the deified embodiment of the nation of people, and it's systems are constructed to allow for syndicates to exist within and under it in order to bring about a relatively stable socialist order.
Where Fascism deserves praise is that it is one of the only Socialist systems outside of Keynsianism that is capable of relative stability due to the manipulation of oligarchies as controllable economic structures delivering mandated economic outcomes and protection rackets. Fascism parasitizes the syndicates for political stability, and can re-align them as needed. Keynsianism is a more stable economic solution for socialism as it focuses on making corporations/syndicates parasites of the market, rather than the state parasitizing the the syndicates. This allows the state to be seen as blameless despite having significant indirect control.
The entire purpose of liberalism is to justify capitalism and exploitation. So is modern leftism.
The purpose of Liberalism is to focus on individual liberty. Free markets operate on similar principles, but Liberalism does not exist to justify free markets. Free markets do not need to be justified, their behavior is simply understood... if you're not a Leftist.
Leftism exists only as a philosophy of War, solely making arguments form power to seize more power. It has no other purpose, and it has no principles outside of the seizure of power.
Meh, this is pointless, that is talking about "leftism" given your definition that I don't consider to be neither meaningful nor accurate. It merely serves to obscure and deflect from the subject. When I mentioned "modern left" I was talking about intersectionality and how it came to be.
My definition identifies Leftism for what it is and always has been regardless of momentary topic changes. A quest for power, a philosophy of War.
Intersectionality came to be as Leftist blowback to post-modernist dominance in Leftist intellectual thought, which had spent so much time deconstructing intellectual theories that it had not actually proven useful as an intellectual weapon until it was properly applied and weaponized in a political environment. This is why the Intersectionalists are "Applied Post-Modernists". A classical post-modernist would reject all meta-narratives, including Marxist ones. This is not politically useful to Leftists who are explicitly promoting Marxist narratives. So, Intersectionalism was invented to rally all of the different Leftist collectivist sects by mandating their co-operation, and only applying Post-Modernist and Critical Theory as a weapon against only anti-Leftist opponents.
The application of Post-Modernism and Critical Theory to Marxism, Feminism, Racialism, Transgenderism, etc was explicitly denied as "invalidating people's lived experiences", and was then used only as a weapon to deconstruct and undermine all non Leftist topical factions.
Reminder that "human rights" were invented by people that used it as a PR stunt.
The first project of the Constitution of the French Fourth Republic also referred to the 1793 version of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. The 1793 document was written by Jacobins after they had expelled the Girondists. It was a compromise designed as a propaganda weapon and did not fully reflect the radicalism of the Jacobin leaders.
From 1791 to 1793, the Girondins were active in the Legislative Assembly and the National Convention. Together with the Montagnards, they initially were part of the Jacobin movement. They campaigned for the end of the monarchy, but then resisted the spiraling momentum of the Revolution, which caused a conflict with the more radical Montagnards. They dominated the movement until their fall in the insurrection of 31 May – 2 June 1793, which resulted in the domination of the Montagnards and the purge and mass execution of the Girondins. This event is considered to mark the beginning of the Reign of Terror.
The trial of the 22 began before the Revolutionary Tribunal on 24 October 1793. The verdict was a foregone conclusion. On 31 October, they were borne to the guillotine. It took 36 minutes to cut off 22 heads, one of which was already dead. Charles Éléonor Dufriche de Valazé had committed suicide the previous day upon hearing the sentence he was given.[17]
Western Cultural Marxism is Marxism being applied to different categories which goes at least as far back as 1st wave feminism. But Leftism has always been like this: switching from one topic to another wherever it can find good ground to dig in and attack from as a base of operations. This is because Leftism is a philosophy of War.
And of course Leftists were being supported by Leftists in international finance who ran the entire banking system because Keynsian Socialists have been running the banking system since the 40's, and Fabian Socialists have dominated finance since the London School of Economics was founded.
That being said, he purpose of the opening of immigration was to promote those same Fabian Socialist plans with a huge burst of immigration that would allow the massive welfare state to succeed, and you'd need that kind of exponential immigration forever to sustain larger and larger payouts until the system collapses in on itself.
These aren't ethnic lines. These are ideological and monetary lines.
That's patently absurd. Ideology, preferences, and emotion are going to be most influenced by experience. Like parenting and environmental exposure. Genetics comes into play on the most extreme parts of the bell curve, not the mean.
I don't care what breed of dog you give me. If I beat the dog and starve him everyday for years on end, it will be a very dangerous dog.
The averages of genetics of an intertemporal abstraction mean little compared to direct conditioning. Hell, I'll go further than that. Diet is more important than the averages of genetics of an abstraction.
Don't lie. Karl Marx was of the tribe and so was Frankfurt School and the Bolsheviks. Nothing to do with Europeans nor their civilizations. . But you already knew that . But you did literally call yourself "secret J subverter" on reddit.
Nothing to do with Europeans nor their civilizations.
Socialism was built, developed, and thrived in Europe. Europeans spread Socialism to all parts of the globe, including Africa. It is a European inventions. Even the concept of Social Justice emerges from Catholicism.
you did literally call yourself "secret J subverter" on reddit.
I asked for that flair because one thing you idiots tend to do is accuse everyone who's white and in opposition to Socialism of being Jewish. Because you're fucking stupid. It's also funny to watch you cry "jew" every time you can't form a coherent counter-argument.
I know some of you can, but it's the rare few of you.
There aren't enough Jews in America to account for the absolute fucking swath of White Leftists. Whites aren't ideologically homogeneous by a fucking long-shot. Tons of them are Leftists.
"This man is guilty of killing someone accidentally without intention, killing someone intentionally with purpose as a sole crime, and killing someone intentionally with purpose while committing other crimes."
"So he killed three people, each in different ways? Because those are mutually exclusive for one incident"
"ORANGE MAN BAD! BAAAAAA!"
"You're under arrest for 104423 counts of theft, I saw you pick up a single rock from private property and am now bringing you to trial to convict you of the same crime multiple times."
Emotional reasoning aka typical woman's mode of thought. Their emotions ARE their reality. Do not project your male mode of thought onto women. They think differently.
I gotta say I'm surprised. I thought they might get him on manslaughter, but I didn't expect this. Every LEO working in a jurisdiction with a leftist government and/or prosecutors should go for a pack a cigs and not come back.
Yep. No matter how deep the calling to try and do some good might be it is clear that the personal risk you assume to do so is extremely high. You're existence is now at the whim of the mob. Should they decide you stepped outside whatever the lines were tomorrow you will not have the support of fellow officers or your government. You will be left in the wind to answer to the mob and nothing more.
I absolutely am surprised as well. If he got convicted of manslaughter, I would at least not be too angry. I would UNDERSTAND. But this is literally an open race war.
Taking that logic, why ever stand up for good? It’s always more risky than complying with evil.
Those jurors didn’t save themselves from much since they just validated the mob. Their movement will only grow from here and nobody in that area will escape unscathed.
Not everyone is willing to stand up for good vs. complying with evil. The entire year of 2020 is proof of that.
It is not always possible to know in advance whether or not you will be the person willing to stand for good at the cost of your own life. We all like to think we will, but history is full of men who failed to do so at some critical juncture.
You can’t know in advance. You can only go through situations and deal with them.
If you put God first then you will be willing to lose everything and afraid of nothing. Otherwise you’ll put something else first, and that’s what they’ll threaten to take from you...
If a guy is a murderer or child molester, and I’m on the jury, he’s going to prison.
Just because blacks have no moral standards doesn’t mean we’d be better off doing the same. If you haven’t noticed, life is not going well for their group as a whole.
Racial solidarity is just a form of faction that only exists in multiracial societies. It's an inevitable byproduct of multiracialism, most easily manifest in minority populations. It's largely a self-defense measure.
But I agree, I wouldn't be a part of someone get away with morally degenerate acts, regardless of race.
If you mean simply patronizing white establishments to support your own people, I respect that. Or living together because you want to maintain community or culture. Even excluding other races doesn’t bother me at all. That’s normal. The whole point of a country, city, or town is to distinguish your area from others.
I just see how evil the black “racial solidarity” is, which is basically side with your own race no matter what.
For me, God is above all. If I lose my soul I gain nothing from solidarity.
Despite current events I actually see a bright future for American whites. Eventually we’ll have a South African situation here and probably segregate and learn from our mistakes. Only it will be on our terms, unlike in SA.
I know more than one officer resigning over this, including a guy less than two years from securing his pension. This country is so far gone, people are willing to walk away from their careers because that's the better option.
Yeah, why would anyone want to be a cop when if a criminal has the wrong skin color your life can be ruined for the woke cultist agenda. Even in cases far more violent than Floyd like when the criminal had a gun or knife and was going for police, if they're black then the cops better not defend themselves.
This will of course only make everything worse in minority & poor communities.
Well then they are more intelligent than your average mercenaries. Things are going to get much worse. I understand though, mercenaries need to feed families too. I'll also be understanding and emotionless when the ones that stayed eat a stray bullet.
Disappointing but not at all surprising. Between the media non-stop claiming he was guilty for the past 10 months, and the threats and doxxing against the jury, it's basically impossible to have a fair trial.
Another thing I tell and explain to family why it's wrong and why the media is bullshit but hey they saw the news so I'm obviously wrong despite all the known evidence I showed them.
It's tough not getting blackpilled over all this junk.
Just waiting for the straw to finally break the camel's back I guess. But at this point it's tough to say if the camel even has the sense to say "Enough!" and do something about it.
Nothing wrong with being blackpilled my nigga. Just be thankful you don't have children and be thankful you get to see how bonkers this ride gets as we crash to the bottom. At this point, I'm positively giddy over what happens next.
There you go, trying to reason and use logic to convince emotional thinkers and cattle. Have you tried to reason with cattle? Do you know how silly that is?
Family response is definitely the worst black pill to swallow. It's hard to even know where to begin when they think NPR is centrist, and they've had the important details of the past 2 decades worth of news omitted from the media coverage they watch. I'm at the point where I'll just rub it in at any occasion when they don't get what they want by voting the way they do. Hey, how'd you feel about Biden seizing private property to build the wall you told me was racist? How do you feel about those concentration camps reaching double capacity? It's only when they bring up politics, but I'm not hiding those barbs. Support defunding the police? How do you feel about all the black people affected by the 400% rise in violent crime in Minneapolis? It's hard not to feel negative about everything when basically everyone who just reads the headlines becomes a moral hypocrite completely divorced from the consequences of the policies and politicians they support.
Remember in that case that we are getting exactly what we deserve. If people are afraid or unthinkingly accept whatever lies they are told, then this is their reward.
Just protect yourself as much as you can and take comfort in the fact that you can see. When it comes time to take action, you will be ready and they won’t.
I was thinking the same thing, I'm sure there were some subtle and not so subtle hints to vote the right way, otherwise they might not need to worry about the media doing the doxxing. Wouldn't want people thinking you were a white supremacist after all.
Extremely likely, between the unchanged venue and the number of politicians who felt the need to weigh in (Mayor, Congresswoman, President).
But the damage is done. We were already (sadly) moving in this direction, but this is a watershed moment. This verdict cements that your rights vary based on your skin color, and inflects severe damage to police departments across the country. There are resignations happening now, and good luck hiring white police officers for as long as this trial remains in memory.
Lmao what court will hear the appeal? The fucking Supreme Court refused to see election cases with clear video evidence because they're scared of nigger mobs.
You think any judge on a lower court will ever let this case come before him?
Epstein was a convicted child rapist who already got away with a slap on the wrist once. It's easier to imagine some prison guard being convinced to look the other way while Epstein got what was coming to him than helping kill an innocent cop who was in the wrong place at the wrong time when he could be next.
Epstein was escaped by Mossad, given facial reconstructed surgery in Israel, and living a retirement less than 0.000000001% of people on earth could dream of.
Chauvin didn't seem surprised by the verdict, and the judge gave him massive grounds for appeal. Not trying to be too tinfoily here, but this seemed a bit like engineered failure. Considering the environment, I'm not sure Chauvin would even want to beat the charges right now.
There was a case of a guy in Arizona who went to prison for 3 years before his conviction got overturn on appeal for using a 10mm pistol because 10mm bad. The guy won his appeal, but after spending 3 years in prison and I believe it wiped out his savings to do so.
Appeals can go on for a very long time. At least a year is common, and I have had experience working at a law firm on matters that went for close to a decade.
This is a case where a mercenary stepped out of line and tried to administer justice to a cult priest. He is being punished and used as a public sacrifice. The rest of the mercenaries received the message. They will keep in line if they want their paycheck.
His job is not to arrest nignogs. The Cult is quite clear on this point. Now, the rest of the establishment mercenaries are clear on this point as well.
Doubt it. The only "white" male was a jewish chemist. Then you had 5 white women, likely afflicted with white guilt. Then you had 4 blacks and 2 mutts.
The women and the jew were going to go along with the black men. The mutts were going wherever the wind blew.
The only marginal surprise is the West African immigrant being on board, but not a massive shock.
In hindsight, the extensive reporting on the jury was obviously a misdirect. Leftist media wasn't intimidating anyone. All of these jurors were radical leftists who planned to vote guilty the moment they were selected. They dishonestly claimed varied and diverse viewpoints and impartiality, and the media broadcast those claims so that the masses would believe it was a legitimate trial. Anyone who actually watched the fucking thing knows that this immediate guilty verdict on all counts is fucking insane.
By the way, we have a serious problem when it comes to "red pilling" left-wing people in this country: these people don't actually watch or read news. No one I know actually watched the trial. They only watched what leftist media said about the trial. The same thing happened on election night; people who honestly believed it was the most important election in history went to bed at 11pm. Why? Because they had work on the morning? No. They just didn't want to see the blatant steal that occurred at 3am.
It's all as Yuri said. You can show these people hard evidence that disproves what they believe, and they simply won't see it.
I don't really disagree. I think that's why the prosecution behaved the way it did. It didn't matter what the facts were because the jury was being persuaded by emotional rhetoric and absolutely nothing else.
Absolutely concur. Prosecutor's argument was pathos-based trash. In my experience, if you have to resort to pathos, your factual case is in bad shape. Disgusting that this ruling even happened. Hopefully, the appellate court throws this shit out.
Unfortunately, it seems that pathos based arguments are way better than fact based ones... or maybe fact based ones aren't better than threats of violence.
Both points are absolutely true. You can mitigate the first to some degree by refusing a jury and allowing the judge to be both the trier of law and fact. Not much can be done against the second.
A lot of people think legal scholars are people who strictly adhere to the constitution, when they actually exist to manipulate the law and constitution, which is why many are test case lawyers.
You gotta admit, they did a phenomenal job sneaking in. This stuff's been going on for decades and only within the last 6-8 years did it suddenly appear everywhere from online to in the public schools.
The right was playing checkers while the left was playing 3-D chess
In both cases, the appellate judges basically said: "Kill yourself".
Don't be surprised if an appeal gets made and Chauvin's attorney is literally told that by the judge who arrests him for Contempt of Court by filing the appeal in the first place.
Won't be contempt. As stated above, he is guaranteed a appeal at this point. More likely that they just give it a skim and rubber stamp it rather than do the right thing. Hopefully it is not the case, but I think they want him to be their scapegoat and he is going to be screwed.
Who's going to grant an appeal? The judge who denied the defense's motion for a mistrial? Who denied the motion to sequester? Who said he trusts the media? Who trusts the jury they wouldn't watch any news? Right.
Get the fuck in line huewhyte man! Now you see. You will be made to submit and comply. Your laws, justice, reason, logic do not matter.
This is real power. This is the expression of real power. He will, at best, rot in jail for the rest of his life. They may demonstrate their power once again on an appeal, just so the denser among you learn your lesson.
Oh right he’s not guilty at all this is just a hung jury being told find him guilty or we kill your family’s as the left plans to burn and loot anyway.
This is the point that the general population needs to recognize that a "race war" is already well underway. This is just the pro-European side losing, and the anti-European coalition winning. It's not about fairness, law, justice, or duty, it's about attacking their enemy, that's all.
Yep. That's it. And we're going to lose. 250 years is a good life span for a country, now it's going to shit because leftists and dindus are going to overrun it with trash
The country had an 80 year lifespan, then got a lobotomy and stumbled along another 170 after aborting it's offspring.
It may have another child, but it's probably going to be retarded.
250 years is not a good lifespan. That’s short enough to be embarrassing. For frame of reference, the country of my parents was started a thousand years ago and is still going strong today.
America is the best country in the world, period. Don’t blame leftists. They suck but they are what, 20-30% of the population? They’re misfits and losers on top of that. So how are they dictating anything?
People stopped caring about God and clung to their wealth instead. That’s why they don’t speak up and why Conservatives are losing. Rather than being destructive and subversive like the left, they are merely cowardly and dishonest.
It wasn’t just wealth though. People caved in to women 100% of the time. We began the decline with the women’s rights movement. They wanted the vote, to work, to run the church... basically to be men. And because men wanted easy sex instead of doing the right thing, they gave in. Now we live in a freaking feminine hellscape where everyone is a victim and needs special attention, especially the poor blacks.
Oh some poor kid drowned or got dropped from a fence? Just let all the immigrants come in. It’s so sad!
That’s what this verdict was about. Women. No more rule of law and benefit of the doubt. We’re running on feelz now. The video made me feel sad about the poor drugged out black loser so Chauvin must go to prison.
Godless simp Christians and Conservatives put us here.
The Country of your parents, KRZYZOWIEC? Polska zginęła już. 4 raz zginęła. Co żyje teraz nie jest tym samem kraj jak był. Nawet Lud jest inny. Kultura też. Nic nie jest siły lub mocny wystarczyjący i największość polaków nie kochają wolności, nie są gotowych na wojnę. Bycie "Narudowcą" nie jest czegoś że normalny polacy są lub chcę być lub wierzą jest dobra.
It's an okay country. Better than most and there is hope. But it's not the same country and it has died multiple times. It's certainly not 1000 years old. More like 20.
Bzdury. Jak możesz pisać taki głupi rzeczy? „Jeszcze nie zgubiony.” Czy to w ogóle ma dla ciebie znaczenie?
Cały świat jest taki sam. Zło rośnie, ponieważ ludzie są słabi. Nigdy powiedziałem że jest inaczej w Polsce.
Myślę że nie byłeś tam ponieważ różnica jest noc i dzień. Ten kraj umiera, a Polska nie. Ten proces cyrkowy jest jeszcze większym dowodem na to.
Do you not see just how many Europeans are leading the charge against Europeans?
Your problem is Leftists. An ideology that comes from Europe and it's civilizations.
Western Cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt school which was founded and developed in Weimar Germany, which began really being pushed in the US during 1960's, right when immigration was getting opened up as well. And of course the people pushing that ideology were all of a similar anti-European persuasion. Being supported by Wall Street and the international finance system to which they had allies along ideological and ethnic lines.
Liberalism was never a real thing. It was just a tactic the Marxists used until their numbers became large enough to outgrow it.
Remember the anti-war liberals that were so prominent when Bush was invading Iraq? Rather quiet during Obama’s admin, wouldn’t you say?
It’s the same with the ACLU and the rest when it comes to free speech or any other issue. They only care about it if it brings them power. They drop it as soon as they acquire the power for themselves.
Is true.
"Liberals" are a leftist PR stunt, nothing more.
This is utter nonsense is damn near all ways.
Equality is not a Liberal value, it is a Leftist value. Inclusion was never a Liberal value at all. Both are explicitly illiberal values.
Individualism is in contradiction to collectivist protectionist Leftist movements like Feminism.
You can say that Leftism wears liberalism as a skin suit and parades it around to look like it's not collectivist, that's why Communists talk about free speech and adorn themselves with AK's when it suits them, and never when it suits not them.
Then again, that's why Leftism can wear any ideology as a fucking skin suit and parade it around to look better. Leftism wearing Monarchism was Napoleon and Bismark's State Socialism. Leftism wearing Nationalism as a skin-suit is Fascism and National Socialism. Leftism wearing religion as a skin-suit is Liberation Theology.
Leftism is illiberal and is antithetical to Liberalism. That is the nature of all principled ideologies contrasting to Leftism. All non-Leftist ideologies are arguments from principle. All Leftism is arguments from power. Leftism can infect any and all ideologies that exist without exception, because there is no principle that Leftism can't claim to hold, because it has no real principles, only arguments from power. This is why Leftism can be adapted to any system or people. Leftism in Islam is Jihadism, for example.
Only in the Rousseau-ian sense that people are born equal and then starkly vary immediately afterwards, to the point that equality is a meaningless concept in the real world, which it is.
You are confusion "individualism" with "atomizaiton" which is completely wrong. Individualism is not opposition to any association with group. If that were the case individualism would have to be explicitly anti-family, and even anti-partner. The idea of a "rugged individual" settling the West with his family would be anti-individual because it contained more than 1 person. Your concept of individualism is reductive nonsense.
While Identity politics is mockery of actually having a duty to one's affiliate group, these are not the only allowed identities in Liberalism. Liberalism allows for any number of identiites including religion, employment, and social groups.
Leftism exploits the concept of victimhood because Leftism is built off of an oppressor-oppressed dynamic.
Leftism wearing Nationalism as a skin suit is Fascism and National Socialism because Fascism is the creation of the Leftist ideologies of Syndicalism, Corporatism, and State Socialism using Jingoism and deification of the State as it's primary methods of implementing Socialist revolution. National Socialism is that same deification of the State, but applying the deified state as the intertemporal legacy and arbiter of a racial group which has been socialized into a single synchronized socialist body politic called a "Volksgemeinschaft".
National Socialism and Fascism are illiberal because they are not only Leftist, but explicitly socialist.
Fascism is not a reaction to the existence of free-markets, it is the system designed for the state to implement the socialist revolution as the deified embodiment of the nation of people, and it's systems are constructed to allow for syndicates to exist within and under it in order to bring about a relatively stable socialist order.
Where Fascism deserves praise is that it is one of the only Socialist systems outside of Keynsianism that is capable of relative stability due to the manipulation of oligarchies as controllable economic structures delivering mandated economic outcomes and protection rackets. Fascism parasitizes the syndicates for political stability, and can re-align them as needed. Keynsianism is a more stable economic solution for socialism as it focuses on making corporations/syndicates parasites of the market, rather than the state parasitizing the the syndicates. This allows the state to be seen as blameless despite having significant indirect control.
The purpose of Liberalism is to focus on individual liberty. Free markets operate on similar principles, but Liberalism does not exist to justify free markets. Free markets do not need to be justified, their behavior is simply understood... if you're not a Leftist.
Leftism exists only as a philosophy of War, solely making arguments form power to seize more power. It has no other purpose, and it has no principles outside of the seizure of power.
My definition identifies Leftism for what it is and always has been regardless of momentary topic changes. A quest for power, a philosophy of War.
Intersectionality came to be as Leftist blowback to post-modernist dominance in Leftist intellectual thought, which had spent so much time deconstructing intellectual theories that it had not actually proven useful as an intellectual weapon until it was properly applied and weaponized in a political environment. This is why the Intersectionalists are "Applied Post-Modernists". A classical post-modernist would reject all meta-narratives, including Marxist ones. This is not politically useful to Leftists who are explicitly promoting Marxist narratives. So, Intersectionalism was invented to rally all of the different Leftist collectivist sects by mandating their co-operation, and only applying Post-Modernist and Critical Theory as a weapon against only anti-Leftist opponents.
The application of Post-Modernism and Critical Theory to Marxism, Feminism, Racialism, Transgenderism, etc was explicitly denied as "invalidating people's lived experiences", and was then used only as a weapon to deconstruct and undermine all non Leftist topical factions.
Reminder that "human rights" were invented by people that used it as a PR stunt.
https://archive.ph/XpY2R https:// en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Girondins
Western Cultural Marxism is Marxism being applied to different categories which goes at least as far back as 1st wave feminism. But Leftism has always been like this: switching from one topic to another wherever it can find good ground to dig in and attack from as a base of operations. This is because Leftism is a philosophy of War.
And of course Leftists were being supported by Leftists in international finance who ran the entire banking system because Keynsian Socialists have been running the banking system since the 40's, and Fabian Socialists have dominated finance since the London School of Economics was founded.
That being said, he purpose of the opening of immigration was to promote those same Fabian Socialist plans with a huge burst of immigration that would allow the massive welfare state to succeed, and you'd need that kind of exponential immigration forever to sustain larger and larger payouts until the system collapses in on itself.
These aren't ethnic lines. These are ideological and monetary lines.
Ideology and preferences, emotion in general, are influenced heavily by genetics. The racial element is never to be underestimated.
That's patently absurd. Ideology, preferences, and emotion are going to be most influenced by experience. Like parenting and environmental exposure. Genetics comes into play on the most extreme parts of the bell curve, not the mean.
I don't care what breed of dog you give me. If I beat the dog and starve him everyday for years on end, it will be a very dangerous dog.
The averages of genetics of an intertemporal abstraction mean little compared to direct conditioning. Hell, I'll go further than that. Diet is more important than the averages of genetics of an abstraction.
Don't lie. Karl Marx was of the tribe and so was Frankfurt School and the Bolsheviks. Nothing to do with Europeans nor their civilizations. . But you already knew that . But you did literally call yourself "secret J subverter" on reddit.
Socialism was built, developed, and thrived in Europe. Europeans spread Socialism to all parts of the globe, including Africa. It is a European inventions. Even the concept of Social Justice emerges from Catholicism.
I asked for that flair because one thing you idiots tend to do is accuse everyone who's white and in opposition to Socialism of being Jewish. Because you're fucking stupid. It's also funny to watch you cry "jew" every time you can't form a coherent counter-argument.
I know some of you can, but it's the rare few of you.
"As soon as society succeeds in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism - huckstering and its conditions - the Jew becomes impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object... The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism."
Yeah, he's clearly a real (((zionist))) shill.
You've never heard of Ludwig von Mises then.
I can't find the parent comment to this.
There aren't enough Jews in America to account for the absolute fucking swath of White Leftists. Whites aren't ideologically homogeneous by a fucking long-shot. Tons of them are Leftists.
"Race war"? Don't be dramatic.... Chauvin was a murderer who got what he deserved
Comment Removed: Rule 16
Bail revoked as well. This is 100% political, there was reasonable doubt out the wazoo...
Terrorism left unchecked is more important than facts.
"This man is guilty of killing someone accidentally without intention, killing someone intentionally with purpose as a sole crime, and killing someone intentionally with purpose while committing other crimes."
"So he killed three people, each in different ways? Because those are mutually exclusive for one incident"
"ORANGE MAN BAD! BAAAAAA!"
"You're under arrest for 104423 counts of theft, I saw you pick up a single rock from private property and am now bringing you to trial to convict you of the same crime multiple times."
At minimum, often sadly its way beyond that; they believe their feelings are facts.
Emotional reasoning aka typical woman's mode of thought. Their emotions ARE their reality. Do not project your male mode of thought onto women. They think differently.
Nailed it. This is the source of all modern problems. It is in fact the source of all evil.
Every little corrupting thing, down to the diversity ads, is made by and for women.
Well you let women vote. What did you think you were going to get? Logic, reason, honor, fairness, self-sacrifice?
I gotta say I'm surprised. I thought they might get him on manslaughter, but I didn't expect this. Every LEO working in a jurisdiction with a leftist government and/or prosecutors should go for a pack a cigs and not come back.
Yep. No matter how deep the calling to try and do some good might be it is clear that the personal risk you assume to do so is extremely high. You're existence is now at the whim of the mob. Should they decide you stepped outside whatever the lines were tomorrow you will not have the support of fellow officers or your government. You will be left in the wind to answer to the mob and nothing more.
I absolutely am surprised as well. If he got convicted of manslaughter, I would at least not be too angry. I would UNDERSTAND. But this is literally an open race war.
The odds are good that if you don't convict on all accounts your life is forfeit. Do you sacrifice your life for a stranger and for Justice?
I don't know what I would do in that circumstance.
Taking that logic, why ever stand up for good? It’s always more risky than complying with evil.
Those jurors didn’t save themselves from much since they just validated the mob. Their movement will only grow from here and nobody in that area will escape unscathed.
Not everyone is willing to stand up for good vs. complying with evil. The entire year of 2020 is proof of that.
It is not always possible to know in advance whether or not you will be the person willing to stand for good at the cost of your own life. We all like to think we will, but history is full of men who failed to do so at some critical juncture.
You can’t know in advance. You can only go through situations and deal with them.
If you put God first then you will be willing to lose everything and afraid of nothing. Otherwise you’ll put something else first, and that’s what they’ll threaten to take from you...
police are mercenaries for the establishment. they need a paycheck just as badly as the average person does.
It's not very effective without racial solidarity.
Yeah takes about 50 years of build up.
Racial solidarity is dumb and destructive.
If a guy is a murderer or child molester, and I’m on the jury, he’s going to prison.
Just because blacks have no moral standards doesn’t mean we’d be better off doing the same. If you haven’t noticed, life is not going well for their group as a whole.
Racial solidarity is just a form of faction that only exists in multiracial societies. It's an inevitable byproduct of multiracialism, most easily manifest in minority populations. It's largely a self-defense measure.
But I agree, I wouldn't be a part of someone get away with morally degenerate acts, regardless of race.
Ok then I misunderstood what you meant.
If you mean simply patronizing white establishments to support your own people, I respect that. Or living together because you want to maintain community or culture. Even excluding other races doesn’t bother me at all. That’s normal. The whole point of a country, city, or town is to distinguish your area from others.
I just see how evil the black “racial solidarity” is, which is basically side with your own race no matter what.
For me, God is above all. If I lose my soul I gain nothing from solidarity.
Despite current events I actually see a bright future for American whites. Eventually we’ll have a South African situation here and probably segregate and learn from our mistakes. Only it will be on our terms, unlike in SA.
I know more than one officer resigning over this, including a guy less than two years from securing his pension. This country is so far gone, people are willing to walk away from their careers because that's the better option.
I don’t blame them. Gonna be hard to recruit
Yeah, why would anyone want to be a cop when if a criminal has the wrong skin color your life can be ruined for the woke cultist agenda. Even in cases far more violent than Floyd like when the criminal had a gun or knife and was going for police, if they're black then the cops better not defend themselves.
This will of course only make everything worse in minority & poor communities.
Only solution: 100% black cops.
100% Marxist cops, 100% white gentile criminals.
Systemic racism and the historical stain of whiteness will be blamed then.
The only solution is to stop playing games with them. Hard enforcement with no exceptions.
If they riot, then arrest the leaders and punish them with lengthy sentences.
The alternative is they grow stronger until it becomes very difficult to deal with them.
If he's resigning and not immediately signing up for his local militia, it'll be a loss for sure.
Well then they are more intelligent than your average mercenaries. Things are going to get much worse. I understand though, mercenaries need to feed families too. I'll also be understanding and emotionless when the ones that stayed eat a stray bullet.
Meet your new rulers... the mob.
More like dictatorship by the puppets pulling the strings of faux-proletarians.
Criminals, degenerates, and communists are not innocent just because the elites fired a starting pistol.
I wouldn't count Democrats or any Marxists as members of the proletariat.
Disappointing but not at all surprising. Between the media non-stop claiming he was guilty for the past 10 months, and the threats and doxxing against the jury, it's basically impossible to have a fair trial.
This farce should have been declared a mistrial
Don’t worry guys, the new buzzword is justice equity, because apparently everyone but white men need to be treated like women by the law.
responsibility and paying taxes are for huewhyyte men only. How much longer can the parasites feed? Surely they know the host dies.
Doesn't matter either way, they're still gonna loot and riot.
Sheeit, datz wat da fuck me n' mah niggahs deserve fo' ya wypipo pressahng us a' sheeiht.
Woke capital is eagerly waiting to buy up the ashes of the neighborhood.
Sheeeit dis Chauvin nigga weren’t publicly hanged an sheeeit i finna get me a new pair a shoes!
It was either going to be riots celebrating the verdict or riots protesting (lol) the verdict.
Another thing I tell and explain to family why it's wrong and why the media is bullshit but hey they saw the news so I'm obviously wrong despite all the known evidence I showed them.
It's tough not getting blackpilled over all this junk.
Just waiting for the straw to finally break the camel's back I guess. But at this point it's tough to say if the camel even has the sense to say "Enough!" and do something about it.
Nothing wrong with being blackpilled my nigga. Just be thankful you don't have children and be thankful you get to see how bonkers this ride gets as we crash to the bottom. At this point, I'm positively giddy over what happens next.
Same. I'm at the point of just laughing while it burns.
Poolside for the apocalypse. This sentiment was common on the old chateau heartiste blog.
No that’s dumb. A loser mentality. If you had lots of children instead, you would be dictating how the future goes.
There you go, trying to reason and use logic to convince emotional thinkers and cattle. Have you tried to reason with cattle? Do you know how silly that is?
Family response is definitely the worst black pill to swallow. It's hard to even know where to begin when they think NPR is centrist, and they've had the important details of the past 2 decades worth of news omitted from the media coverage they watch. I'm at the point where I'll just rub it in at any occasion when they don't get what they want by voting the way they do. Hey, how'd you feel about Biden seizing private property to build the wall you told me was racist? How do you feel about those concentration camps reaching double capacity? It's only when they bring up politics, but I'm not hiding those barbs. Support defunding the police? How do you feel about all the black people affected by the 400% rise in violent crime in Minneapolis? It's hard not to feel negative about everything when basically everyone who just reads the headlines becomes a moral hypocrite completely divorced from the consequences of the policies and politicians they support.
Remember in that case that we are getting exactly what we deserve. If people are afraid or unthinkingly accept whatever lies they are told, then this is their reward.
Just protect yourself as much as you can and take comfort in the fact that you can see. When it comes time to take action, you will be ready and they won’t.
A jew, 5 white women, and 6 joggers walk into a deliberation room...
Stop me if you've heard this one before.
Jury of one's peers my fucking ass HONK HONK.
Was that the makeup for real or are you being funny?
"6 joggers" was actually 4 blacks and two mixed pocs, but other than that, it's accurate.
Unsurprising.
What are the bets that a juror was effectively threatening the rest into compliance and the cowards went with it?
Not that the jury needs to do that since congress was already doing it.
I was thinking the same thing, I'm sure there were some subtle and not so subtle hints to vote the right way, otherwise they might not need to worry about the media doing the doxxing. Wouldn't want people thinking you were a white supremacist after all.
What are the odds that 1) he appeals, and 2) the appeal changes some part of the outcome?
Extremely likely, between the unchanged venue and the number of politicians who felt the need to weigh in (Mayor, Congresswoman, President).
But the damage is done. We were already (sadly) moving in this direction, but this is a watershed moment. This verdict cements that your rights vary based on your skin color, and inflects severe damage to police departments across the country. There are resignations happening now, and good luck hiring white police officers for as long as this trial remains in memory.
He's the next Harold Fish. Yeah Fish won on appeal after spending 3 years in prison and it bankrupting his family. That's "winning".
The punishment is in the process, not in the sentence.
Lmao what court will hear the appeal? The fucking Supreme Court refused to see election cases with clear video evidence because they're scared of nigger mobs.
You think any judge on a lower court will ever let this case come before him?
I wonder if to prevent such a thing Mr. Chauvin will meet an untimely end in prison.
Even then, what's to prevent him getting Epsteined?
Epstein was a convicted child rapist who already got away with a slap on the wrist once. It's easier to imagine some prison guard being convinced to look the other way while Epstein got what was coming to him than helping kill an innocent cop who was in the wrong place at the wrong time when he could be next.
Epstein was escaped by Mossad, given facial reconstructed surgery in Israel, and living a retirement less than 0.000000001% of people on earth could dream of.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
while i support the general sentiment, he was just the puppy, so unlikely.
i would think that will rather be true for his handler, we currently don't hear anything about in the media.
Taking out one’s own asset would not instill confidence in the other assets that remain in the field.
Extremely highly, maxine waters' dumbass comments the other night mean he has a very good shot at getting it overturned
He should, but I have little faith in the judicial system to actually see that play out.
Chauvin didn't seem surprised by the verdict, and the judge gave him massive grounds for appeal. Not trying to be too tinfoily here, but this seemed a bit like engineered failure. Considering the environment, I'm not sure Chauvin would even want to beat the charges right now.
I dunno long long appeals take, but they could definitely want it to take a long time for things to cool off (things wont cool off though)
There was a case of a guy in Arizona who went to prison for 3 years before his conviction got overturn on appeal for using a 10mm pistol because 10mm bad. The guy won his appeal, but after spending 3 years in prison and I believe it wiped out his savings to do so.
Appeals can go on for a very long time. At least a year is common, and I have had experience working at a law firm on matters that went for close to a decade.
God I wish they would but their pensions will stop them
At this point they've got to ask themselves can they hold on and collect that pension if the mob decides tomorrow what they did today was wrong?
Very true.
This is a case where a mercenary stepped out of line and tried to administer justice to a cult priest. He is being punished and used as a public sacrifice. The rest of the mercenaries received the message. They will keep in line if they want their paycheck.
Completely unsurprising
Welcome back to the United States of Lyncherdom in all its (in)glory, folks.
That's what I've been saying.
Wasn't that Twain?
Yep, the one & only.
I'm expecting one of them to get a book deal.
Soap Box
Ballot Box
Jury Box
<-- You are now Here
The last box of liberty
Ammo prices have been indicating which box we're on for a while now.
This is the dumbest shit ever I can't even the dude was just doing his job and now he's going to jail for it
His job is not to arrest nignogs. The Cult is quite clear on this point. Now, the rest of the establishment mercenaries are clear on this point as well.
Political trials.
this country is finished.
Justice is dead.
Unsurprising.
What are the bets that a juror was effectively threatening the rest into compliance and the cowards went with it?
Not that the jury needs to do that since congress was already doing it.
Doubt it. The only "white" male was a jewish chemist. Then you had 5 white women, likely afflicted with white guilt. Then you had 4 blacks and 2 mutts.
The women and the jew were going to go along with the black men. The mutts were going wherever the wind blew.
The only marginal surprise is the West African immigrant being on board, but not a massive shock.
West Africans are generally very based.
Surprising the Woke and Racists alike. "Black" is not a unified cultural group.
In hindsight, the extensive reporting on the jury was obviously a misdirect. Leftist media wasn't intimidating anyone. All of these jurors were radical leftists who planned to vote guilty the moment they were selected. They dishonestly claimed varied and diverse viewpoints and impartiality, and the media broadcast those claims so that the masses would believe it was a legitimate trial. Anyone who actually watched the fucking thing knows that this immediate guilty verdict on all counts is fucking insane.
By the way, we have a serious problem when it comes to "red pilling" left-wing people in this country: these people don't actually watch or read news. No one I know actually watched the trial. They only watched what leftist media said about the trial. The same thing happened on election night; people who honestly believed it was the most important election in history went to bed at 11pm. Why? Because they had work on the morning? No. They just didn't want to see the blatant steal that occurred at 3am.
It's all as Yuri said. You can show these people hard evidence that disproves what they believe, and they simply won't see it.
I don't really disagree. I think that's why the prosecution behaved the way it did. It didn't matter what the facts were because the jury was being persuaded by emotional rhetoric and absolutely nothing else.
Absolutely concur. Prosecutor's argument was pathos-based trash. In my experience, if you have to resort to pathos, your factual case is in bad shape. Disgusting that this ruling even happened. Hopefully, the appellate court throws this shit out.
Unfortunately, it seems that pathos based arguments are way better than fact based ones... or maybe fact based ones aren't better than threats of violence.
Both points are absolutely true. You can mitigate the first to some degree by refusing a jury and allowing the judge to be both the trier of law and fact. Not much can be done against the second.
Yeah, but that assumes you can trust a judge.
Yep. Fucked either way tbh.
Based Yuri reference.
Weren't some of these charges by definition mutually exclusive? Mob rule at work it seems
I don't understand how you can get 3 charges of murder for the same death.
And I’m sure this will put an end to people thinking the country is racist.
It is racist.
Against non blacks
I was being sarcastic. I’m black and I am so fed up with the people who constantly cry about racism
Right? If that were true it would at least be a silver lining but we all know there's too much money at stake for them to ever stop.
If you do work for Synchrony Bank, why not leak the info yourself and black out your contact info?
None of this will stick on appeal.
We'll see. You have no idea the extent to which the judiciary is infiltrated by leftists.
Coincidentally, one of the first critical race theory writers (as in, came up with it, started codified it, etc) is a legal scholar.
A lot of people think legal scholars are people who strictly adhere to the constitution, when they actually exist to manipulate the law and constitution, which is why many are test case lawyers.
You gotta admit, they did a phenomenal job sneaking in. This stuff's been going on for decades and only within the last 6-8 years did it suddenly appear everywhere from online to in the public schools.
The right was playing checkers while the left was playing 3-D chess
Donald Trump and Count Dankula say "Hello".
In both cases, the appellate judges basically said: "Kill yourself".
Don't be surprised if an appeal gets made and Chauvin's attorney is literally told that by the judge who arrests him for Contempt of Court by filing the appeal in the first place.
Won't be contempt. As stated above, he is guaranteed a appeal at this point. More likely that they just give it a skim and rubber stamp it rather than do the right thing. Hopefully it is not the case, but I think they want him to be their scapegoat and he is going to be screwed.
Who's going to grant an appeal? The judge who denied the defense's motion for a mistrial? Who denied the motion to sequester? Who said he trusts the media? Who trusts the jury they wouldn't watch any news? Right.
He is guaranteed an appeal at this point to the State Appellate Court by law.
It absolutely will. I see some of you still do not know how real power works. I suppose a second demonstration may convince you?
why would anyone care anymore about being a cop when following procedures can get you thrown into jail?
Waiting for the appeal...only a dumbass would be a LEO any more.
Honestly, the cops in Missouri now really need to just fuck off.
Just Missouri?
No, but it's priority number 1.
Why?
Shit, I got confused between Missouri and Minnesota...
That's what I was thinking. Lol
Get the fuck in line huewhyte man! Now you see. You will be made to submit and comply. Your laws, justice, reason, logic do not matter.
This is real power. This is the expression of real power. He will, at best, rot in jail for the rest of his life. They may demonstrate their power once again on an appeal, just so the denser among you learn your lesson.
How can you be guilty of murder and manslaughter for the same death?
Oh right he’s not guilty at all this is just a hung jury being told find him guilty or we kill your family’s as the left plans to burn and loot anyway.
Not surprised. I feel jury would’ve been threatened otherwise. Wasn’t it proven that the drugs didn’t cause his death?
The corner's own report had stated had they not watched the video he would have ruled it an overdose.